|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
24 Jul 2016, 17:10 (Ref:3660856) | #276 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
|||
|
24 Jul 2016, 17:10 (Ref:3660857) | #277 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,372
|
Quote:
I would love to see the Toyota from Le Mans back. That pace and we would have had more of a fight today. Well. Decent race with some really good points and a lot of just driving around. |
||
__________________
Drive faster and longer than the rest ...in anything but a Honda... |
24 Jul 2016, 17:13 (Ref:3660860) | #278 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,386
|
At least Mexico will have decent hours. Being honest though, I can't get into an Audi vs Porsche only battle. I hope Toyota are in it next round. Should be a no-brainer in tire choice there since its always hot.
|
|
|
24 Jul 2016, 17:15 (Ref:3660861) | #279 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 596
|
Great coverage from Fox Sports here. The whole race live.
|
|
__________________
"Every Le Mans, the car which wins Le Mans is the best car." - Tom Kristensen |
24 Jul 2016, 17:15 (Ref:3660862) | #280 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 593
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
24 Jul 2016, 17:54 (Ref:3660877) | #281 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,691
|
That is the fault of the tv company as the race was not over and most people wanted to hear what was happening to effect places, Glad they were speaking about it sad the pictures were not showing it
|
||
|
24 Jul 2016, 18:03 (Ref:3660878) | #282 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
It's clear from this race that Audi are back on pace as far as the speed end of the equation. I think that their refueling times vs Porsche and Toyota need to be looked at, but the speed in the car is back.
Porsche locked this one up more on strategy than anything else. Those stops that allowed them to leapfrog both Audis about a 100 laps in sort of sealed things up unless the Audis really went on a tear in terms of pace. But aside from when Lotterer dropped the hammer when he got back in the car, from then on out they largely held station for the most part. Once the #2 Porsche had it's issues, Audi seemed to settle into cruse mode, seemingly realizing that pushing like hell wouldn't gain them much. They decided to go for max points because the win seemed to be out of reach in the end. The #2 Porsche finishing 4th and barely on the lead lap (and that sort of depends on if the ACO call them for a penalty for the alleged pit infraction) wasn't the day they were looking for. They seemed to fall off late in Leib's stint where Hartley and DiGrassi were both running him down, the contact with the #88 911 didn't help, let alone the penalty they got, Jani struggling with Duval, getting hounded by Lotterer, and finally having to change the rear of the car shows that they day was pretty much a mess. That being said, it could've been a lot worse. Spinning out in traffic on a restart isn't a good thing (even if the time lost was minimal in the end), and if the #2 hit that Porsche GT car in the right place or any harder, that could've knocked them out of contention, too. And Toyota? What can be said? Drivers and team did their part at the track. I don't know what the #6's issue was, but they lost about 4 laps in the garage and all I could tell was that they were working around in the engine bay. They didn't want that. Also, more bad news down the road is that the #5 team are currently on their last engine before incurring penalties for using more than 5 engines in a season. The #5 team's season has basically been a nightmare with unrewarded efforts at Spa and of course Le Mans. I don't see that changing if the stuff with the engine use penalties are true and especially if they (Toyota as a whole) keep lunching engines. Also, as with last year and at Silverstone, TMG seem to still be struggling aero balance/overall downforce on the high downforce tracks. I hope that practice and qualifying was just them being on a program, but even Buemi admitted that the thinks that Toyota lack downforce. That might not be hugely bad at Shanghai, Bahrain or COTA because of a lot of start/stop, but Nurburgring is a lot of start and stop, too, and Audi and Porsche were clearly on another level relative to Toyota. IMO, this also shows the danger of the bodywork kit limit that ironically Toyota have been very supportive of. I know that TMG have their own wind tunnels, which are about second to none in terms of quality (most F1 teams have been to TMG at least once or twice the past few years since they pulled out of F1), but when you screw up your aero kit, you're basically stuck with it unless the ACO say you can change it though a waiver. But that would almost be tantamount to being full on BOP back to LMP1, which right now the only BOP is though the EOT process, with everything else being essentially free within the technical regulations. Granted, you can make minor changes to the bodywork for development purposes, but if things are messed up beyond that, you're sorta screwed. |
||
|
24 Jul 2016, 19:49 (Ref:3660900) | #283 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 825
|
Quote:
It's quite annoying to realise that, in WEC, you don't win by being the fastest car, on track, but by cheating(playing tricks, if one doesn't think it's illegal) with the refueling and having NASCAR-esque calls from the race director! People often bash IMSA and NASCAR for the abuse of artificiality but today WEC was very sad, in such sense. Audi being faster on track(3 tenths on actual and ideal lap), to then gets an awful lot of time lost after every pitstop was already farcical enough for me but then the debatable FCY that would've gifted the win, and tittle, to the #2, was truly disgusting. I think Freitas should've waited a little to avoid interfering with the overall win result(was just one rather small piece on the track, afterall) but even if we assume the decision to have been correct, ACO/FIA seriously needs to rethink, imho, the rules of FCY. You can't close the pit because somebody might be short on fuel or something, but it's very important that something is done to avoid the artifice we witnessed today(like closing the pit exit). Does the WEC wants to be like NASCAR, Indycar.... that manufacturers results with calls of yellows/SC? Also the punishment for Lieb's mistake was quite lenient and seemed to me like orchestrated to spice up the race with putting the #2 right behind the #8. Sure, some people will say:"why are you complaining? we had great racing from the VAGs, and all classes overall, today." My thinking is that just because there was plenty of good stuff in the race doesn't mean that we need to overlook what was seriously wrong with it. PS: Very sad about the dismal pace of Toyota as a 3-way fight would've been epic. If they didn't bother to show up at any of the remaining races, it wouldn't make any difference(unless some other layout massively suits their car) and that's really sad. |
||
|
24 Jul 2016, 20:00 (Ref:3660903) | #284 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
KCMG has been penalized pending appeal. Officials have declassified the car for a ride height irregularity somewhat similar to the penalty the #7 Audi got at Silverstone this year and one of the ESM ARX-03s at Silverstone '15.
|
||
|
24 Jul 2016, 20:31 (Ref:3660909) | #285 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 825
|
Quote:
As you said, it's not worthy for you because Toyota was where I said they would be. Some people only watch to cheer for a team...... Toyota will need Spa's fluke again to be a contender this year(imo), ie, be the only car with optimal tires available. On equal tires, what you'll have is today and Silverstone.... Mexico's Mickey Mouse layout could favour TS050 but the altitude will tough for the NA engine, so ACO needs to correctly balance things there |
||
|
24 Jul 2016, 20:38 (Ref:3660910) | #286 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
The NA engine argument doesn't hold water for Toyota this year because they have a turbocharged V6 in the TS050. That'd effect the LMP2 cars a bit if everyone wasn't running a Nissan V8.
It's gonna be a much bigger deal in GTE-Pro since we have turbo engines (Ford and Ferrari) vs atmo engines (Aston Martin and Porsche). |
||
|
24 Jul 2016, 20:48 (Ref:3660913) | #287 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Part of Toyota's problem is that they build a car that is suited to Le Mans and was supposed to shine at Le Mans, which it did.
Granted, they ultimately got nothing for it in reward, which makes it extra frustrating, as they now have to live with the drawbacks for the rest of the season. Had they managed to run those elusive 1 1/2 laps, they`d be the smartest guys in the paddock now... but it wasn't meant to be. |
|
|
24 Jul 2016, 20:57 (Ref:3660918) | #288 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,386
|
Cant write off their car or chances yet. Thats the first time they ran this aero and seemingly they made the wrong choice of tire. Not sure what you're talking about with f1, Arthur. What's f1 have to do with Mexico's wec start time? It's in the western hemisphere, that means it won't start at 4am pacific time for me. You must have misunderstood or something.
|
|
|
25 Jul 2016, 00:27 (Ref:3660967) | #289 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Pretty standard order of things judging by the results-PDF
I read the CLM exploded (again) and AER failed on #12 (again) but how did #13 manage to be so slow to just barely beat LMP2 (again)? |
|
|
25 Jul 2016, 00:38 (Ref:3660969) | #290 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,386
|
That AER is not a good/reliable engine. If I were one of these guys I'd have a good look at the Judd or hope for the Super GT engines to be available.
|
|
|
25 Jul 2016, 00:45 (Ref:3660971) | #291 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
AER has always been bit shady but it's a total disaster here
I'm not sure if something else can even be fit to these chassis, it took ages from Oreca to mod the AER into the existing Toyota compartment too |
|
|
25 Jul 2016, 01:14 (Ref:3660977) | #292 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,449
|
Unfortunately, the track is another Tilke-tarmac-nized one...
|
|
|
25 Jul 2016, 03:02 (Ref:3660984) | #293 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,755
|
Quote:
Atleast, now we all have been shown that there are too many variables at play to predict any outcome. |
||
|
25 Jul 2016, 06:54 (Ref:3661016) | #294 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,157
|
Maybe I'm just in my summer mood, but I just wasn't feeling this race. [Or maybe it's because I watched F1 and that was quite depressing] It all seemed kind of dull. Even though the battle in LMP1 was very tight. Once Porcsche got a bit of an advantage, to me it never really looked like Audi were going to win this. The Toyotas weren't far behind, but they were just sort of also rans.
LMP2 wasn't that exciting either. Maybe if the #26 hadn't retired. GTs... don't care. To end this on a more positive note, I'm impressed that they announced the date of next year's race already. Good job. I also like the track. Not because it's anything special, but because it's a bit different to the usual Tilkering. |
|
|
25 Jul 2016, 11:18 (Ref:3661057) | #295 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 554
|
||
|
25 Jul 2016, 16:21 (Ref:3661099) | #296 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Hmm, two more pit fires in the supposedly "safer" ACO style of pit stop...
|
||
|
25 Jul 2016, 16:41 (Ref:3661111) | #297 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,269
|
Quote:
Plus, with the ACO stype of pit stop, there were less people around the car and the fire marshals were able to get to the fire far quicker without tripping over mechanics working on the tire changes. |
|||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
25 Jul 2016, 16:59 (Ref:3661115) | #298 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
I just find it funny how everyone bashed the crap out of the IMSA style pit stops and said that there was gonna be a whole mess of fuel fires. There was one very small one at the Rolex a few ears ago and that was it. The WEC has had two in this race alone, and quite a few more over the past few years.
|
||
|
25 Jul 2016, 17:34 (Ref:3661131) | #299 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,932
|
Quote:
Doesn't matter what system you use, if you have a non-return valve that's allowing returns, that's not going to end well for anyone. |
||
|
25 Jul 2016, 17:51 (Ref:3661139) | #300 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 825
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think Toyota's best chance will be on Mexico because the layout isn't much different than Nurb's S3 and TS050 was very quick there. I agree with Acid09, Toyota's effort was all on LM and they were very competent. It was quite clear to me since the Prologue that they wouldn't bother with the HD tracks |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WTCC] 2016 WTCC 5 Predictions - R05 Nürburgring Nordschleife RESULTS | Mekola | Touring Car Racing | 2 | 2 Jun 2016 17:22 |
[WTCC] 2016 WTCC 5 Predictions - R05 Nürburgring Nordschleife | Mekola | Touring Car Racing | 11 | 26 May 2016 17:07 |
What race license do you need for the Spa 6hours? | joss Ronchetti | Historic Racing Today | 20 | 15 Sep 2011 22:11 |
F3000 Two Worlds Prediction Competition - Round 4, Nürburgring | Mekola | National & International Single Seaters | 11 | 1 Jun 2004 11:46 |
FIA F3000 Round #5 @ Nürburgring predictions | DanFlag | National & International Single Seaters | 7 | 27 Jun 2003 18:57 |