|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
31 Mar 2006, 16:57 (Ref:1566251) | #126 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,263
|
When I listed the practices as tests, you went all technical about it explaining the difference when you knew what I meant. That's what I meant from that quote.
About the getting killed not in a race as a driver I would consider it worse as everyone considers the risks when racing yet testing or practicing you shouldn't be taking a risk that's why I find it worse imo... |
||
__________________
The thrill from west hill |
31 Mar 2006, 17:04 (Ref:1566258) | #127 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
That final practice is to set the car up for the race with the conditions of the day. It's really under race conditions for everybody with the whole field out there. That said, as I've posted before, and others have added to, there are many, many elements to this tragic accident. There is no SINGLE element to point a finger at and say, "There." Some, like Robin Miller, have tried to do so politically. They have failed. And with every single accident in racing that someone ascribes a single element to, there're always going to be other factors....in testing, practice, a race or driving to church on Sunday.
EDIT: Luke, baloney. Just what does "worse" mean to you? The result's the same. |
|
|
31 Mar 2006, 17:35 (Ref:1566281) | #128 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 7,263
|
I can't see how what I said was 'baloney', maybe you'll wish to add your opinion. Yes the result is the same and its just as bad but when racing, your out there at ten-tenths, at 100%, practicing or testing you shouldn't be taking those risks as such as you would in the race. That's why I see it worse being killed not racing. That's just my opinion as a fellow driver. Can you not see where I'm coming from?
|
||
__________________
The thrill from west hill |
31 Mar 2006, 17:47 (Ref:1566288) | #129 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,983
|
No, not really, I don';t understand at all, because we don't even know whether it was 10/10ths or 9/10ths or 11/10ths and we don't know, and suspect that factor was NOT, the absolute 100 percent reason for the contact and accident.
|
|
|
31 Mar 2006, 18:47 (Ref:1566349) | #130 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
I see where your coming from luke, but your basic point falls a little flat.
A driver will push whenever he gets the chance, be it testing, practice or race. He is not a racing driver otherwise. It is more dangerous driving at less than full capacity, at times IMO (less concentration). |
|
|
1 Apr 2006, 06:51 (Ref:1566725) | #131 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 147
|
Sad loss. Rest In Peace, Paul Dana. I'll miss you
|
|
|
10 Apr 2006, 20:24 (Ref:1577965) | #132 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,516
|
RIP Paul Dana
|
||
__________________
my pen will not write on the screen |
15 Apr 2006, 20:37 (Ref:1583060) | #133 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 785
|
I saw a video of the incident again a few days ago, can't remember where right now; that was exactly the same coverage as the vid already posted but lasted a bit longer instead of ending so quickly after the contact.
After the impact where the original vid ended, it focuses on Dana's car. You can see that the car doesn't flip over, it just lifts up at the front and then comes back down on its wheels, trundling down the track to a rest, and it amazed me how intact the car looked. Obviously it's a bit of a mess at the front but it seemed to hold together and the rear wing/rear suspension looks completely intact. Having seen the impact I wasn't at all surprised that the injuries were fatal but I expected the car to have been blown apart like it was in the Brack accident. I'm not sure what the point of this is, it's just an observation. Had I been watching at the time and seen that I might have given him a chance. |
||
|
15 Apr 2006, 23:46 (Ref:1583169) | #134 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 611
|
the car flying apart is a good thing because it means there's something taking the energy other than the driver. Part of why the crash was so dangerous was because it was head on with no parts (sidepod & wheels for the side, trans and engine for the rear) to absorb the impact.
|
||
__________________
racing is an addiction that once you get it into your blood, no matter how long you sit out, its always there. |
16 Apr 2006, 14:32 (Ref:1585047) | #135 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Another problem with the head on crash is the force is concentrated all in one direction, which is highly dangerous indeed.
Far better to be in a "spectacular" accident, theoretically. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Paul Dana | OpenWheel4ever | Tributes Forum | 2 | 22 Apr 2006 15:22 |
Paul Dana International Raceway | Alwaysfirst | My Track Designs | 15 | 19 Apr 2006 22:13 |
Will Simmons Replace Dana at RLR?? | Tim Northcutt | IRL Indycar Series | 14 | 7 Apr 2006 16:07 |
Dana & Sponsor to Rahal-Letterman | Tim Northcutt | IRL Indycar Series | 13 | 15 Jan 2006 21:00 |