Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 8 May 2017, 06:28 (Ref:3732135)   #10
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan52 View Post
There is a saying history is written by the winners and that is definitely the case here.
Most definitely


Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan52 View Post
To discount the history of any sports event any time there is a change of organiser,TVs network or even competitor base does not happen.
In this case there was a consistent organiser for 35 years. The competitor base chose not to compete in that event anymore and went off and started their own race, with the race they left continuing on for another 2 years in competition.

To me that indicates the end of one event, and the overlapping start of another one. They were two different sporting events.

The whole way the firstly IMG and now Supercars run 1000 is run is for completely different purposes to that of which the original race was run. All they shared in common was a race distance and competitor base.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan52 View Post
History lesson.In 94 the ARDC,7 network and Bathurst Council formed the Bathurst Consortium to promote racing at Bathurst.
The three-way collaboration in running the race went back to 1988, when ATN7 funded the purchase of the event marketing rights off Promo International, which resulted in ATN7 taking on full responsibility for all the marketing & promotion of the race from then on

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan52 View Post
If the ARDC was not bound by the consortium they may have done a deal with AVESCO but there certainly would have been no Super Touring 1000.
Of course they could have, but in this case the ARDC/Consortium was bound by a TV deal with Channel 7 for the event that went through to 2004.
The stumbling block (publically) was played out around TV deal.... AVESCO said they'd only race on the Long Weekend with Channel 10...so basically they wanted the Bathurst 1000 to break their contract, so AVESCO didn't have to break their contract...

Of course in an interview in 2012 on V8 Insiders, Tony Cochrane made a comment about the teams laughing in 1996 when he suggested they should take over Bathurst, so did AVESCO ever really have any intention of working with the traditional event?

It would have been interesting to see what the landscape of motorsport would have been like if there was already a second successful event at Bathurst still going in the 1996/97 period (eg...had the 12hr kept on going) and there was no weekend available for the AVESCO 1000 to take place on.
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Penkse's combined racing budget: $100M JagtechOhio Indycar Series 4 28 May 2010 16:59
Needham Market stevebrown Marshals Forum 14 13 Feb 2003 23:24
Free Car!!!! And the state of the UK used car market paul c Road Car Forum 3 23 Apr 2001 08:21
usgp tix: a buyers market botsquad Formula One 11 23 Sep 2000 02:55


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.