|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
30 Mar 2009, 11:24 (Ref:2428901) | #1 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 196
|
Race 2 grid order rule set to change? Or not?
Anyone know what’s going to happen with the starting order format? May it change mid-season?
After the initial flack from all and sundry, it was interesting to read a rather positive piece on it here. Quote:
What does everyone else think? |
|||
|
30 Mar 2009, 14:50 (Ref:2429048) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
change it ASAP, hate it.
|
||
|
30 Mar 2009, 20:03 (Ref:2429263) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,661
|
Depends on the format.
Three sprint races? I reckon it's dumb. It takes 3 races to fight back from a dodgy qualifying run. Twin enduros like the Clipsal? Bring it on... |
||
__________________
Punters Beer Fest. Indy 02, Clipsal 03, Winton 04, Paperclip 05, Darwin 06, Oran Park 07, Phillip Island 08, Sandown 09, Townsville 10, Symmons 11, Eastern Creek 12, Winton 13. Townsville 14. Paperclip 15, Sandown 16, Symmons 17, PI 18, The Bend 19 |
31 Mar 2009, 01:09 (Ref:2429470) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 549
|
I don't care one way or the other really but I do think the drivers and team owners were as dumb as dirt for not saying anything about the new rule when it was first published in December (?) and yet starting whining and bellyaching about it in Adelaide three months later.
|
||
__________________
"Either we fly or we die." Jamie Hyneman, Mythbusters, SBS |
31 Mar 2009, 01:52 (Ref:2429481) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,642
|
I understand the original proposal was for a qualifying session on Saturday morning for the Saturday race and another qualifying session on Sunday morning for the Sunday race.When the team owners objected to this on cost grounds (pretty hypocritical as they embrace increasing numbers of street races with the associated massive damage bills) the current system was accepted as a compromise.Like all compromises the gaps in logic in the system are apparent.
|
||
|
31 Mar 2009, 02:32 (Ref:2429488) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,040
|
|||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
31 Mar 2009, 03:29 (Ref:2429496) | #7 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 474
|
The POLITICS behind this are simple.
For the STRONG teams who on average qualify well, it's an insurance policy to minimise dropping points off the championship leader, by being guaranteed a good R2 start position. For the WEAK teams, it is a nail in the coffin of teams who previously relied on a lucky R1 race result to start R2 from the front half. The final result can be nothing less than a greater divide between the well-off and the no-so's. The new 2009 qual rule is nothing more than another attempt to artificially keep the championship close. |
|
|
31 Mar 2009, 05:05 (Ref:2429509) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,063
|
Quote:
|
||
|
31 Mar 2009, 05:49 (Ref:2429512) | #9 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 474
|
It's the races that capture most viewer/spectator attention...yet VESA have instigated a system where Qualifying is now the most important part of the weekend.
Qualifying now plays a disproportionate role in the weekend and the championship. I think if you look at the years TV schedule, you'll find VERY LITTLE live qualifying coverage, yet it is going to determine the championship if this system continues...it is not balanced. A cynic may conclude that this rule change is more about creating discussion and publicity, than being a solution that benefits the sport as a whole. In Euro FIA formula's, when Qualifying determines a R2 grid, that race has it's own qualifying (ie: two separate and independent qualifying sessions). This in itself is cumbersome. |
|
|
31 Mar 2009, 08:31 (Ref:2429558) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
davestar i think you might wont to reconsider your post in light of most if not all of qualifying been shown as well as a the top ten shoot out
me i think qualifying is wrong totally, what a stupid way to determine grid positions |
|
|
31 Mar 2009, 09:19 (Ref:2429601) | #11 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 300
|
|||
|
31 Mar 2009, 09:24 (Ref:2429607) | #12 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
its really simple. give everyone a chance ito start in each position. so in theory over time each person should start in positions 1 thru 30
(or just do it totally randomly) |
|
|
31 Mar 2009, 09:29 (Ref:2429614) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
chook raffle.
|
||
|
31 Mar 2009, 09:32 (Ref:2429619) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
well i think you would call it grid raffle.
in a chhok raffle the winner gets a chook, but unless steggals or KFC come on board i cants ee that happening |
|
|
31 Mar 2009, 09:35 (Ref:2429621) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,125
|
|||
|
31 Mar 2009, 09:36 (Ref:2429623) | #16 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 300
|
Sure. The teams will go for that...So we turn up saturday go home sunday and an event becomes 2 days?
|
||
|
31 Mar 2009, 09:43 (Ref:2429628) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
we still practise, except we concentrate on race set ups in practise
We get a much more interesting race as passing occurs and we test the drivers more because we get to see who can carve through the field and who can handly midpack on the first corner and sponsors get more exposure I see no negatives except we have to get rid of an old fuddy duddy idea that achieves very little is a two day event such a bad idea. V8SA were already considering it for this year certaibly the crowds are small on friday. |
|
|
1 Apr 2009, 02:32 (Ref:2430233) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 577
|
I hate it.
I think they've tried to change too much of what was already a decent formula. Go back to the old system of qualifying and introduce the soft tyre option asap, that'll introduce a bit more strategy into the racing and provide for some overtaking. |
||
|
1 Apr 2009, 03:23 (Ref:2430252) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 542
|
This weeks AA reports the the Qualy format is set to change effective from Hamilton with Qualy for Sat and Qualy for Sun. Then again i just recalled it is april 1 so it could be a joke. If so poor taste from AA on such an important issue.
|
||
__________________
"He Didn't Bump You, He Didn't Nudge You, He Rubbed You... And Rubbing Son Is Racing" |
1 Apr 2009, 04:09 (Ref:2430271) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
if it isn't a fools joke i don't mind it, i reckon a 20 min dash Sunday morning would be a thrill.
|
||
|
6 Apr 2009, 07:56 (Ref:2434832) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
http://www.v8supercars.com.au/conten...fying_changes/
common sence preveils. they have gone with the system i said i wouldn't mind in the above poste. i deally i would like it to be where you finish Saturday you start Sunday but i don't mind this. it allows teams to get their car right on Saturday and do a better job of qualifying on sunday. |
||
|
6 Apr 2009, 09:29 (Ref:2434909) | #22 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 1,125
|
Quote:
its not perfect but its a damm sight better than the new format |
|||
|
6 Apr 2009, 22:17 (Ref:2435526) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,208
|
That really dilutes the Top 10 Shootout, though, doesn't it?
Whats the point of having a shootout for one race and not the other? I think this makes less sense than the previous format. |
||
__________________
Phil Mills: 30, 6-Left-Plus Over-Crest-Long, Opens-Over-Crest 100, COW-COW, 100, 6-Left-Minus Extra-Long Fabrizio Giovanardi: I have like a banana - is the yellow car in front - that make me, you know, running like the monkey, running for the banana. When I see yellow in front, I just pushing harder and harder. I want that banana. |
6 Apr 2009, 23:16 (Ref:2435546) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,267
|
It only makes a slight improvement on the clipsal qualifying format... but not much. It does mean that teams who stuff up in qualifying 1 can at least rectify that stuff up for qualifying 2. They might have more data in the car obtained from race one. But is the 20 minutes going to be a free for all?
What are they trying to fix with qualifiying? I wasn't aware that there was anything majorly wrong with it. I noticed with that release that they talk about the soft tyre option. I kind of like this, however it would be a shame for it to be just part of the procession - as in F1. You will find that all teams will now start with the soft tyre for better get away, then they change to the optimum tyre for the rest of the race when the track is more rubbered in. |
||
__________________
I'm not saying "let's go and kill all the stupid people"... I'm just saying "let's remove all of the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out". |
7 Apr 2009, 00:08 (Ref:2435576) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 531
|
Quote:
Gridding up in race 2 back in the original qualifying places IMHO was a joke. Im happy with the change but dont understand why they just dont start from R1 finshing positions. |
|||
__________________
Bite off more than you can chew and then chew like hell. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Engine change penalty rule | cobra77 | Formula One | 24 | 13 Apr 2007 16:22 |
Will there come a time when there will be not more rule change? | Greenback | Formula One | 13 | 26 Nov 2006 22:45 |
FF1600 Rule change Pole | darcym | National & International Single Seaters | 3 | 13 Oct 2003 18:53 |
Weekend Rule Change for Fantasy Grid | Liz | ChampCar World Series | 7 | 13 Oct 2003 02:34 |
Qualifying order on Saturday will not mix the grid up | TeddyG | Formula One | 21 | 3 Mar 2003 23:13 |