Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Classic Cars Monthly Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Historic Racing & Motorsport History > Motorsport History

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 Jul 2007, 01:03 (Ref:1952970)   #1
bil588
Veteran
 
bil588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
United States
Posts: 683
bil588 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
1994 and 1995 Indianapolis 500s

Is it true that the regulations allowed more engine displacement and boost for pushrod engines for the 1994 and/or 1995 Indianapolis 500s?

"Mercedes-Benz used the Indianapolis 500 to debut their Mercedes 209 engine (the 209 stands for the size of the engine in cubic inches). The Penske cars were dominant for the entire month."

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1994_Indianapolis_500

"In 1994, the Indianapolis 500 was won with an engine from Mercedes-Benz which, realizing that a loophole in the rules for production-based engines would include any pushrod engine,[citation needed] built a very unusual purpose-built pushrod engine with a significant power advantage. This was done knowing that the "forgotten" loophole would be closed immediately after they took advantage of it,[citation needed] and so the engine would in fact be usable only for this single race.
Starting from 1995, Mercedes-Benz rebranded the Ilmor engines and achieved six wins in their first full season, also reaching second in the drivers championship powering Al Unser Jr.."

- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercede...rsport#Indycar
bil588 is offline  
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel!
Quote
Old 3 Jul 2007, 01:15 (Ref:1952973)   #2
bil588
Veteran
 
bil588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
United States
Posts: 683
bil588 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Were the rules changed for 1995 regarding engines?
bil588 is offline  
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel!
Quote
Old 3 Jul 2007, 16:29 (Ref:1953527)   #3
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It had more to do with the fact that the Indy 500 was not a CART race (though it counted for the CART championship most years), it was sanctioned by USAC, so the race regulations were different, which allowed stock blocks to compete.


I recall a rule change for the 1995 race in the wake of the 1994 Penske-Mercedes domination with that engine, but the Buick/Menard stock block motors still scored a 1-2 (Scott Brayton from Arie Luyendyk) in qualifying.
racer69 is offline  
__________________
"The Great Race"
22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999
Quote
Old 7 Jul 2007, 23:43 (Ref:1957214)   #4
bil588
Veteran
 
bil588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
United States
Posts: 683
bil588 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
do you mean production-based engines?
bil588 is offline  
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel!
Quote
Old 31 Jul 2007, 05:49 (Ref:1976874)   #5
bil588
Veteran
 
bil588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
United States
Posts: 683
bil588 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The Indy 500 website doesn't have old regs posted.

http://www.indy500.com/
bil588 is offline  
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel!
Quote
Old 31 Jul 2007, 20:58 (Ref:1977629)   #6
D-Type
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
United Kingdom
Coulsdon, Surrey
Posts: 585
D-Type should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
According to Higham

The Indianapolis regulations allowed
1979 -84 - 4500cc normally aspirated, 2650cc turbocharged, 5878cc stock block normally aspirated, 3430cc stockblock superchargedcharged
1985-96 - 2650cc turbocharged and 3430cc stockblock supercharged. Normally aspirated engines phased out

CART
1979 to date - 2650cc turbovharged, 3430cc stockblock supercharged

IRL
1995-96 2650cc turbocharged
1997 to date production based 3500cc normally aspirated.

Surprisingly, the Wikipedia entry looks about right. As I understand it, the intention of the regulations was stockblock 3430cc supercharged engines but the wording was pushrod engine. So Penske persuaded Ilmor to produce a Mercedes-benz branded pushrod racing engine which wiped the board in 1994 and was banned for 1995. I don't know if it was supercharged or whether the regulations sid 'forced induction' allowing it to be turbocharged.
D-Type is offline  
__________________
Duncan Rollo

The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.
Quote
Old 19 Aug 2007, 04:59 (Ref:1991699)   #7
bil588
Veteran
 
bil588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
United States
Posts: 683
bil588 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Who/what is Higham?
bil588 is offline  
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel!
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2007, 02:05 (Ref:1992431)   #8
Bob Riebe
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
Minnesota
Posts: 2,351
Bob Riebe User has been fined for unsportsmanlike behaviour!
Quote:
Originally Posted by D-Type
According to Higham

The Indianapolis regulations allowed
1979 -84 - 4500cc normally aspirated, 2650cc turbocharged, 5878cc stock block normally aspirated, 3430cc stockblock superchargedcharged
1985-96 - 2650cc turbocharged and 3430cc stockblock supercharged. Normally aspirated engines phased out

CART
1979 to date - 2650cc turbovharged, 3430cc stockblock supercharged

IRL
1995-96 2650cc turbocharged
1997 to date production based 3500cc normally aspirated.

Surprisingly, the Wikipedia entry looks about right. As I understand it, the intention of the regulations was stockblock 3430cc supercharged engines but the wording was pushrod engine. So Penske persuaded Ilmor to produce a Mercedes-benz branded pushrod racing engine which wiped the board in 1994 and was banned for 1995. I don't know if it was supercharged or whether the regulations sid 'forced induction' allowing it to be turbocharged.
No one thought anyone would take the time to develope a push-rod racing engine.
The Ilmore Mercedes was blown.
CART and USAC had different blower pressure levels which is why the two valve engines worked in USAC.
Push-od NA engine were not phased out, both USAC and CART would not give Dan Gurney, or anyone, the inches necessary to run a two valve engine without being at grenade levels.
USAC depending on year first allow push-rod NA engines of 255 inches, then 305, then 355 production and 320 special heads.
NA full racing engines were limited to first 256, then 274 inches cubed.

USAC never really banned anything but made turbines hopeless with intake rules; all else just was rarely to never used, until the blown full race push-rod engines showed up then they stuck their heads up their butts and banned those.
After that they just faded away.
CART at least at first, also allowed the push-rod NA engines, as Gurney won at Milwaukee with one, and also had his car on the front row at Indy with one, during the CART years.

Although Gurney was a CART founding father, his was one of the first people they crapped on.
Bob
Bob Riebe is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Aug 2007, 11:49 (Ref:1992655)   #9
D-Type
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
United Kingdom
Coulsdon, Surrey
Posts: 585
D-Type should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by bil588
Who/what is Higham?
The International Motor Racing Guide - Peter Higham - 2003, ISBN 189361820x.
A thoroughly researched and accurate fact book or statistical record covering al major series from Grand Prix racing to NASCAR. As a measure of its accuracy - it correctly records the Haresnape and Catlin retrospective AAA champions and the 1939 European Champion dual candidates.
D-Type is offline  
__________________
Duncan Rollo

The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.
Quote
Old 7 Jan 2008, 07:09 (Ref:2101034)   #10
bil588
Veteran
 
bil588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
United States
Posts: 683
bil588 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Mercedes-Benz 500I Engine

11,000 plus miles of testing for one race?

(Indy was bigger back then)

http://rides.webshots.com/photo/2096...99963812UPOnLy
bil588 is offline  
__________________
Please bring road and rally racing to the VERSUS tv channel!
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2013, 03:53 (Ref:3328744)   #11
Graham Clayton
Racer
 
Graham Clayton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Australia
South Windsor, NSW Australia
Posts: 128
Graham Clayton should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The rules allowed the Mercedes 209 to have a larger capacity (209 ci versus 161.7 ci for the overhead cam engines), plus a bigger turbo boost (55 compared to the 45 of the Ford and Honda engines).

Rule 11.07 had existed since 1991, but since it only applied to the Indy 500, it wasn't viable for a team to build a new engine purely for that one race.
Graham Clayton is offline  
__________________
"There's nothing wrong with Zolder that a bulldozer can't fix" - Tom Walkinshaw
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1994 and 1995 Spanish Touring Car Championships Msoli Touring Car Racing 10 23 Mar 2018 19:47
Indianapolis 1995 macdaddy ChampCar World Series 32 1 Mar 2004 11:58
Which do you rate higher - Suzuka 1994 or Nurburgring 1995 Yoong Montoya Formula One 16 13 Apr 2003 12:59
[Magazines] Autosport Indexes for 1994/1995 supertouring Armchair Enthusiast 6 3 Mar 2003 08:21
Should they have scrapped the 500s ??? f2001 Bike Racing 14 17 Oct 2001 20:55


All times are GMT. The time now is 20:18.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.