|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
11 Jan 2010, 11:40 (Ref:2611550) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,985
|
Turbo Equivelancy
Can anyone remember when turbo equivelancy was changed from x1.4 to x1.7 please?
What effect does/ will this have on historic racing. ie cars that raced in era with a 1.4 equivelancy many have raced in a 2 litre to 3 litre class but if the more recent 1.7 equivelancy is applied they would now have to race against over 3 litre cars that traditionally were not there class rivals. has thisbeen anissue anywhere? |
||
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy |
11 Jan 2010, 12:48 (Ref:2611578) | #2 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,742
|
That's actually a pretty good question andy.
In 1983-1985 the BTCC class system was: Class A 2501-3600 cc (In everywhere else under Grp A; Class A was for cars above 2501 cc....) Class B 1601-2500 cc Class C upto 1600 cc Frpm 1986-1989 the class system was: Class A: above 2500 cc Class B: 2001-2500 cc Class C: 1601-2000 cc Class D: upto 1600 cc 1990 onwards was just over 3000 and upto 3000 classes. From 1988 the RS500 cubic capacity was rated at 3389cc (the cars standard capacity of 1994 x1.7) in race programme entry lists for the BTCC, and I think it was the same in the ETC. I have a feeling that this was changed for 1989 or 90 because when that car was homologated in 1986 under x1.4 factor equivalency it's 'race' cc was rated as 2792cc. Another point is that in 1984, the Colt Starion 2.0 Turbo had an equivalency cc of approx 2800 which slotted it into Class A (above 2501cc) and the Bluebird 1.8 Turbo and Metro 1.3 Turbo both into Class B (1601-2500cc) so they can only had an equivalency of x 1.4 to fit into that class. In fact I think the Bluebird would've been very close to slotting into the over 2500 cc class at the time but there was some interesting standard CC rating being issued fot it? |
||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
11 Jan 2010, 13:07 (Ref:2611592) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,040
|
As far as FISA regulations were concerned, the Group A turbo equivalency factor was changed for 1988, from 1.4 to 1.7
There were also other regulation changes, which took rubber off the smaller cars (affecting the likes of the BMW), and i think it also added weight to the bigger capacity cars, stuffing the Holden's even more (or it could have been taking tyre width away also, have to look it up) |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
11 Jan 2010, 14:28 (Ref:2611648) | #4 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,742
|
That's it r69, I couldn't quite nail the year.
But, with those added measures taken, you have to wonder why those changes took place when it so obviously was going to favour the RS500, and quite probably the M3 even further over any class rivals, as these 2 cars were already streets ahead before the changes |
||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
11 Jan 2010, 20:43 (Ref:2611856) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 5,404
|
Quote:
|
||
|
12 Jan 2010, 19:43 (Ref:2612349) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,170
|
Quote:
With the 1987 turbo coefficient of 1.4 both engine sizes fits nicely into the 2.5 catagory/960 kg/10" rims in direct competition with the BMW M3. With the new 1.7 coefficient for 1988 the Evo has a 2995 cc compared to the normal versions 3024 cc. With new minimum weights for '88 as well the Evo would weigh in at 1020 kgs compared to 1100 kgs for the normal version. The Volvo 240 Turbo was a car that was penalised heavily with the new coefficient. At 2127 cc it slotted in just under 3 litre/1035 kgs under the 1.4 rule, but at 3616 cc/1180 kgs with the 1.7 rule. It mattered little as the car was ancient by then anyway. In the Nordic countries cars homologated before 1st January 1987 (before the Ford Sierra RS Cosworth and BMW M3) was allowed to run to the old regulations after 1st January 1988, keeping especially the best Volvos in the hunt. Cars like the MG Metro Turbo and Toyota Starlet Turbo (both 1.3 litre) would end up in direct competition with the BMW M3 E30 under the 1.7 coefficient were previous they had a 2 litre class at least in the BTCC. Jesper |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Austin/MG Metro/Metro Turbo Challenge (split from Grp A Turbo thread) | HC Racing | Motorsport History | 105 | 24 Dec 2023 17:34 |
Atmo or Turbo | lj79 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 22 | 17 Aug 2005 22:17 |
1000cc turbo | DanJR1 | Racing Technology | 4 | 5 Aug 2003 07:52 |
Turbo's after all in 2003? | racer69 | ChampCar World Series | 18 | 15 Jun 2002 09:19 |
What's in a turbo ? | The Beer Baron | ChampCar World Series | 3 | 9 Feb 2002 08:18 |