|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
17 May 2015, 11:09 (Ref:3538509) | #1 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 495
|
Would unfreezing the engine development be really that expensive?
I always keep hearing that the engine homologation rules were meant to put brakes on engine development in order to control the engine R&D costs. However, given that much of the engine architecture is already frozen (e.g. V6 turbos with a certain type of hybrid and energy recovery units), would there really be a whole lot of room to spend too much money if engine development was allowed at all times?
|
|
|
17 May 2015, 20:38 (Ref:3538703) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,192
|
One should know that even without regulations outlawing in-season modifications, engine development will effectively limited due to the regulation stating a driver may only use four engines per season. However, I do believe the engine homologation indeed reduce costs. Without it engine manufacturers would have to run at least to separate development programs: one for the current engine and one for next year's engine, one that is more fundamental. Research and development requires a lot of man hours and production for sol purpose of simulation and testing.
|
||
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari |
18 May 2015, 11:39 (Ref:3538912) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Only for Mercedes, everyone else would save a heap of now dead marketing spend by putting a little money into actually getting competitive!
|
|
|
20 May 2015, 08:21 (Ref:3539565) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
Quote:
|
||
|
20 May 2015, 21:35 (Ref:3539781) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,192
|
|||
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari |
20 May 2015, 21:53 (Ref:3539783) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,252
|
It wouldn't cost anymore. Every team spends every penny of the money they have available to them. The only thing engine freezes, etc, achieve, is a reallocation of what the money is spent on.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Should F1 compete on engine development instead? | Greenback | Formula One | 14 | 5 Dec 2007 19:52 |
Engine development frozen for ten years | VilleneuveTracy | Formula One | 1 | 26 Oct 2007 19:20 |
2005 development, and development in general | SetikX | Formula One | 6 | 14 Jan 2005 19:13 |
Engine upgrade under development... | neilap | Formula One | 15 | 30 Mar 2002 04:18 |