|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
23 Aug 2017, 13:24 (Ref:3761177) | #51 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 364
|
Quote:
Obviously, over time, those eligibility rules were relaxed - Ford were fitting OHC motors in the road cars, and the VE was outside the wheelbase regs. Falcon and Commodore sales were plunging, and the factories withdrew a good amount of funding. So we get COTF, and the fwd conversions to the Volvo and the Altima. Now Volvo are gone, Ford is there in name only, and we have Gen 2 on the scene. Falcon is dead; the Commodore is changing. There is simply no need for the 4 door rule any more. I can only assume the anti 2 door brigade are perhaps younger fans that have only known the 4 door racers; perhaps some others still have a grudge against the R32 GT-Rs. But to take that approach is to ignore the great history of 2 door cars in our Touring car history. From Production Cars, to Improved Production, Group C and then Group A there have been many. From Ian Geoghegan’s ’65 Mustang we have also had the Bathurst winning Mini (1966), Holden giving us the HK 327 and HT 350 Monaros, then the XU1s and A9X Hatchbacks, Ford with the XA/XB/XC Falcon Coupes, Valiant Chargers, Mazda RX7s, BMW 635s, Jaguar XJS, Alfetta GTV, the 80’s Mustangs and Sierras that Ford ran when they didn’t have a suitable Falcon. Nissan of course had the 240K, DR30, HR31, and R32 Skylines as well as the 1200 Coupe in class racing. I’m sure there would be others, hell, I even remember cheering on Allan Grice around Bathurst in a Fiat 124 Sports! My hero then, because I had one (or three). Yes, there are successful 4 door cars in those history books too – Bob Jane’s Jag, the Falcon GTHOs, 4 door Toranas, VB-VP Commodores, and the Datsun Bluebird turbos all come to mind. Absolutely no reason to ban 2 door cars - just keep the 4 seat rule. |
|||
|
23 Aug 2017, 16:04 (Ref:3761210) | #52 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 573
|
I live in Italy and I started watching Supercars only in 2015, so I apologize in advance if I will write incorrect things because maybe I still don't know some dynamics.
Here in Italy, national championships are quite ignored and circuits are quite empty during the ACI-CSAI weekends, even if we have totally free tickets. I let you imagine what the situation would be like if we also had to pay in order to see races. It's depressing. So, in watching Supercars I was fascinated by the amount of public coming to the circuits. I remember that in 2015, at Pukekohe, there were 115.000 people attending the event. I'm talking about an Australian series coming to New Zealand. Amazing, IMHO. If an Italian championship comes to Austria for a race weekend, the attendance will be zero and also race grids will be shorter! Maybe that's why I started watching Supercars and why I love it so much. And then I read the article posted at the beginning of this thread. I'm a bit surprised. I thought that Supercars was amazing, but you are talking about a struggling series and less attendance on the circuits. Probably my vision is distorted for the reasons I explained above... I will not talk at length about TV coverage, because I watch races delayed on Mondays or Tuedsays, except for some races, so I don't have problems concerning pay TV or somewhat. But I think that the TV crew is amazing: races are very well explained, the commentary is exciting, the pit lane interviews are appropriate and punctual. I really appreciate them, because they motivate someone who lives so far in following the championship. Here in Italy, this thing doesn't exist. Races are quite badly broadcasted, because Italian TV channels always have to talk about football (soccer, if you prefer...). I know that Australians have a particular addiction for V8 engines. I love them too, here in Europe there was the Superstars Series years ago, with V8 engines, and I really loved it. But I also think that V8 engines are not the future. V6 turbo is more suitable for the market and, as said by "V8 Fireworks", it gives more chance to have different cars on the grid. V6 turbo cars are surely "worse-looking" and "worse-hearing" than V8, but you have to think about the wellness of the championship also: the important thing, for a touring car series, is to guarantee a proper number of cars (25-30) and exciting races, I think that this type of cars will suit these characteristics. You also have a great number of well-known drivers, I think you'll watch Supercars more gladly if you think that Whincup, Lowndes, McLaughlin, SVG, Mostert, Frosty etc. are in, they will always offer a great show. Dear Australian friends, maybe you have to consider yourselves lucky because your championship rocks and I think it will still rock in the future. From far away to you, I don't think Supercars has lost its relevance at all. |
||
|
23 Aug 2017, 19:25 (Ref:3761250) | #53 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 852
|
Quote:
Less reliance on manufacturers means rules and regs can be structed around competitors needs/wants. Surely when only two teams really get factory support its time to admit we could do without them and their "requirements". Take Motocross. I've raced/been involved for longer than I care to say. The big regulation change from 2 stroke to 4 stroke was done as manufacturers wanted to sell 4 strokes. Problem is, gate numbers have gone steadily downward ever since - mid to low level teams can't afford maintenance on the highly strung 4, let alone the cost of making the motor competitive. Now, all you'll hear about is the need to go back to the cheaper/simpler racing to boost numbers and I think it definitely would help. 80% of manufacturers don't sell 2 bangers though so... |
||
|
23 Aug 2017, 21:30 (Ref:3761268) | #54 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,837
|
Quote:
NASCAR made this a goal in the early 70's even if complete withdrawal of manufacturer support has not ever happened. Supercars needs to create a set of regulations that can be supported by the racing budget of one or two major sponsors. Today majority of the field is covered by multiple sponsors to a degree we have not seen before. Think back over the history of the sport and most teams ran with one major sponsor and a small handful of secondary sponsors or trade support. Therefore any future regulations must consider what a sponsor is willing to spend. If that is, for example, $1.5 million per year, then that is what they need to aim for to ensure the long term sustainability of the sport. If that means we see the teams running cars such as those in the TA2 series with significantly reduced overheads then so be it. But whatever the outcome, set a target budget that the teams can meet with one major sponsor and a few secondaries and you have a sustainable series. |
|||
__________________
"Your biggest auto race may one day become a Camaro playground", Chris Economaki, Bathurst 1979 |
23 Aug 2017, 21:42 (Ref:3761269) | #55 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
Quote:
|
||
|
23 Aug 2017, 23:00 (Ref:3761281) | #56 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 575
|
Quote:
|
||
|
23 Aug 2017, 23:04 (Ref:3761282) | #57 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 575
|
Quote:
|
||
|
24 Aug 2017, 01:24 (Ref:3761298) | #58 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,146
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
.......just waiting for ANTON DePASQUALE to chalk up his first V8SC Championship! |
24 Aug 2017, 01:51 (Ref:3761301) | #59 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 444
|
|||
__________________
The cat has my tongue and I'm not saying much cause I get shy around bulls*&% - Paul Dempsey |
24 Aug 2017, 04:45 (Ref:3761313) | #60 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 575
|
Quote:
|
||
|
24 Aug 2017, 08:32 (Ref:3761330) | #61 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,648
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
24 Aug 2017, 08:56 (Ref:3761332) | #62 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,272
|
??
Channel 7 effectively created what is now known as Supercars! Read some of Mr Cochrane's quotes from the 1996-2000 period, and see if you still have the same opinon.. |
|
|
24 Aug 2017, 09:40 (Ref:3761336) | #63 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
Quote:
However if we are, then ch 7 tried to kill the great race in 1997 (some on here say it did) |
||
|
24 Aug 2017, 10:04 (Ref:3761338) | #64 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 575
|
||
|
24 Aug 2017, 10:19 (Ref:3761339) | #65 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
||
|
24 Aug 2017, 11:14 (Ref:3761345) | #66 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 575
|
But what was the reference, V8s as a name or the beginning, I know the details of the ATCC in 64 (wasn't it). I though 97 was 10 though. So to a degree 155 is right in 7 started the ATCC, but back then money wasn't an issue that is as big now, it still was an issue but not like now
|
|
|
24 Aug 2017, 11:18 (Ref:3761347) | #67 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
Quote:
however the media package back then is irrelevant to the thread. and we should let it go or discuss elsewhere. |
||
|
24 Aug 2017, 11:32 (Ref:3761351) | #68 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,272
|
Quote:
In 1997 the category got a different name (to V8Supercars) and changed broadcasters to Channel 10, but the actual regulations which kicked off in 1993 stayed much the same (beyond updating the cars to the next model in from EF to EL Falcon & VR to VS Commodore) |
||
|
24 Aug 2017, 11:45 (Ref:3761355) | #69 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,447
|
Quote:
V8s sound good. Even terrible ones sound good. Most 4 pots don't. Bigger cars tend to be more interesting anyway, not just for being rarer. Who even notices a modern hatch back unless it's hotted up condiderably - and most of those look ridiculous. A large, powerful saloon turns heads. RWD makes for better racing cars. Modern tyres spoil a lot of the spectacle by being too fussy about being a little sideways and working too hard. Racing rules on overtaking also spoil some of the spectacle in penalising someone for making an attempt instead of the person who had an avoidable collision by ignoring the laws of physics and shutting down a car which is already on it's limit. There are places where Supercars have lost their way, category management seem to be too full of their own self-importance for a start, but they're still more exciting as a starting point than the whole BTCC/WCC/TRC concept. They're just made artificially exciting by ignoring the non-contact element of 'proper' racing and following the stock car route. I'm not sure V8s need to be relevant, but they need to resemble the sort of vehicle a lot of people aspire to drive. And if the majority think that they're more similar than they are, that's probably a good thing for keeping them interested. |
|||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
24 Aug 2017, 13:16 (Ref:3761370) | #70 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 573
|
Quote:
I also agree with Woolley: Supercars has to follow the market without losing his "big cars" and powerful engines philosophy. That's why I think that the V6 formula will be good. It's also important to have at least an Australian manufacturer, and Holden will be still in. I also like TCR cars, because they're bringing back the real touring car racing here in Europe for the first time since Super Touring. But our market is quite different to the Australian's. Maybe Australia will have a TCR series in a few years, maybe also with a good number of cars, but I think that Australians will never like it, because cars like TCR don't fit with them. It will be quite the same as Super Touring: in the 90s there were two Australian championships but I think (maybe I'm wrong, tell me if that's the case) that they weren't equally followed despite both had a good level of drivers. |
|||
|
24 Aug 2017, 13:45 (Ref:3761374) | #71 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Per usual, the overseas fans notice that Supercars is one of, if not the best touring car series in the world, yet the locals just crap all over it.
|
||
|
24 Aug 2017, 15:17 (Ref:3761384) | #72 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 522
|
You never really appreciate what you have until it's gone.
|
|
|
24 Aug 2017, 17:01 (Ref:3761403) | #73 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,739
|
Quote:
|
||
|
25 Aug 2017, 02:59 (Ref:3761449) | #74 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,941
|
A Commodore SS is a dime-a-dozen in Australia, while good luck finding a BMW 550i with a manual transmission in Australia (Australians are obsessed with automatics!).
|
|
|
25 Aug 2017, 04:23 (Ref:3761455) | #75 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 359
|
OP = Yes.
I said this after Clipsal and was virtually marginalized. We're in for a couple more years of distorted statistics to fain "health" in the series, but ultimately we're now in the 'slow burn till the end' era of the series, and there are lots of reasons for this. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Motorsport has lost one of its champions | Trevor | Australasian Touring Cars. | 13 | 5 May 2013 03:18 |
Historically speaking: the commercial relevance of non-production-based motor sport? | Greg Cozier | Motorsport History | 28 | 1 Dec 2012 12:24 |
Relevance of Dunlop Series from 2013 | SouthAussie94 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 19 | 14 Nov 2012 09:49 |
FBMW Europe - has it lost its way? | egomeister | National & International Single Seaters | 87 | 9 Jan 2009 11:43 |
Adelaide R1 - pretty boring - has Adelaide lost its magic?? | Michael H | Australasian Touring Cars. | 58 | 5 Apr 2002 23:47 |