|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
29 May 2009, 09:03 (Ref:2471433) | #51 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 826
|
|||
|
29 May 2009, 09:05 (Ref:2471435) | #52 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 826
|
The In Pit Lane podcast has Wyhoon saying Camm came over on him and he moved across to find Muscat there...Muscat was clearly alongside if not pretty much past him so he didn't just appear...
|
||
|
29 May 2009, 10:17 (Ref:2471466) | #53 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,410
|
|||
|
29 May 2009, 11:55 (Ref:2471539) | #54 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,561
|
I think rolling starts are every bit as entertaining and exciting as a standing start.
AND they save loads of $$ on driveline components and life thereof. AND they're certainly safer. AND they'd reduce the downtime between races at busy meetings like state rounds.... |
||
__________________
Real race cars have more camshafts than doors |
31 May 2009, 01:53 (Ref:2472403) | #55 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
|
Cold tyres had NOTHING to do with this incident.
Have you thought that the tyres were up to temp and this may have caused the vehicle to bog down off the line? |
||
|
31 May 2009, 02:18 (Ref:2472410) | #56 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,410
|
Quote:
So-- you tell us what the contributions were ?? |
|||
|
31 May 2009, 02:51 (Ref:2472415) | #57 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
|
Can you please explain to everyone how tyre temperature could have anything to do with this particular incident where two vehicles make contact at speed, 200-300 metres after the start line, leap into the air and make contact with the barriers?
Most vehicles have completed their tyre warm up cycle by the time we come under the GMC bridge, so why "waste" another lap rather than start racing? After all this is what the crowd comes to see and the drivers come to do. With an incident such as this even a rolling start may not have resulted in a different outcome, possibly even worse as the vehicle speed at the same point of the contact would have been greater. From my drivers seat it looked to me to be a typical "racing incident". We are all lucky that most of the vehicles will be back however it appears we will not see the Hamilton Commodore or the Brown Gallant back. |
||
|
31 May 2009, 06:09 (Ref:2472440) | #58 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,410
|
Firstly-- this was within 100 metres of the start line-- so lets deal with a few ascertainable facts first.
It is not a "typically " racing incident when the cars come into almost immediate contact after the start . Both cars on the front row had trouble getting traction as they left the line.The car coming from the second row dived to the inside and as he went past the White car came into contact.Wheelspin and the lack of traction (not an unusual occurrence with powerfull cars)caused the sideways movement of the blue/white car to move across the track and sqeeze the gap --look at the video. You can see the blue/white car squirming-and moving across the track. You seem absoloute about your "opinion" about the cold tyre issue. It is a pity that the people with experience of the tyre technology do not agree. I do agree that a rolling start could have made it worse -especially when some genius is putting cars one length behind each other. Your comment about wasting a lap really personifies your ignorance- how many Sports Sedans that were entered on Friday made it to Sunday afternoon finish? Not much point in having races if there are no cars left to race in them.-- so who is wasting the laps? The attrition rate is bad enough without losing so many cars in an avoidable incident.Including the U2 ltr cars 28 entered? 13 by Sunday afternoon-- 5 only of the over 2 litre cars. Hardly a result to be pleased about.Particularly when some may not be back in the forseeable future with huge repair bills. |
||
|
31 May 2009, 09:14 (Ref:2472523) | #59 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 22
|
"not an unusual occurrence with powerfull cars", yep obviously something I have never encountered with my under powered vehicle.
It looks like I agree to disagree...........................................again |
||
|
31 May 2009, 11:17 (Ref:2472593) | #60 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 35
|
Quote:
And I'll shut up now. |
||
|
9 Jun 2009, 23:12 (Ref:2478773) | #61 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,410
|
Any update on this?
|
||
|
30 Jun 2009, 14:26 (Ref:2493931) | #62 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 6,033
|
|||
__________________
. . . »-(¯`v´¯)-»........................The retro report........................©®»-(¯`v´¯)-» ê¿~ Disclaimer; the above is pure speculation and only posted for entertainment purposes!!! |
1 Jul 2009, 07:56 (Ref:2494308) | #63 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 3
|
Nice in car footage.
Good work on finding some. The view on you tube was getting a bit old. lol
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Historic Sports Sedan Register | Camaroz | Australasian Touring Cars. | 285 | 21 Aug 2017 07:19 |
Fastest Under 2 Litre Sports Sedan | team drinkalot | Australasian Touring Cars. | 19 | 19 Dec 2008 11:33 |
Sports Sedan Champion | Nivola | Australasian Touring Cars. | 1 | 30 Aug 2005 06:46 |
Sandown Rd of '76 Sports Sedan Championship | Beejay17 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 23 | 13 May 2002 05:08 |
Your Sports Sedan | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 15 | 23 Jun 2001 08:28 |