Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Barn Finds > ChampCar World Series

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 Dec 2003, 20:11 (Ref:813382)   #1
Raving
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 20
Raving should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Petition against standing starts!

Let’s not loose a tradition and a trademark of our beloved sport! Say no to standing starts! How? We are starting a petition against it which we will send to OWRS.

You can sign up by e-mailing me your name (or nick), city or county and the comments you have on the subject.

csaba.toth@motorsportok.hu
Raving is offline  
__________________
#99
Old 16 Dec 2003, 20:20 (Ref:813393)   #2
Phoenix1
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location:
Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 739
Phoenix1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sorry I prefer standing starts. This season certainly there has been many aborted starts with cars not lining up right though obviously no standing starts on ovals! I thought about the narrow courses but if F1 can do it at Monaco CART can do it anywhere as well. I also prefer standing starts from a biased point of view as I've always been quite good at them!

A mix though would be good and I can also understand you not wanting to change as it is heratige and well why would OWRCART(that how it named now?) change it?

Last edited by Phoenix1; 16 Dec 2003 at 20:21.
Phoenix1 is offline  
Old 16 Dec 2003, 20:24 (Ref:813399)   #3
rustyfan
Veteran
 
rustyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Sweden
Posts: 5,419
rustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Phoenix1
Sorry I prefer standing starts. This season certainly there has been many aborted starts with cars not lining up right though obviously no standing starts on ovals! I thought about the narrow courses but if F1 can do it at Monaco CART can do it anywhere as well. I also prefer standing starts from a biased point of view as I've always been quite good at them!

A mix though would be good and I can also understand you not wanting to change as it is heratige and well why would OWRCART(that how it named now?) change it?
Extremely well said and I totally agree.
rustyfan is offline  
Old 16 Dec 2003, 20:28 (Ref:813401)   #4
Flatspot
Veteran
 
Flatspot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
United States
Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,301
Flatspot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think a mix would be great. Adding to the diversity that makes this series great can't hurt a thing.
Flatspot is offline  
__________________
A good friend will come bail you out of jail. A true freind will be sitting next to you saying "Damn...that was fun!"
Old 16 Dec 2003, 20:59 (Ref:813429)   #5
ascarracinguk
Veteran
 
ascarracinguk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location:
Infront of my computer
Posts: 3,909
ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!
have rolling starts for ovals and street courses and standing for road courses....for safety reasons, tradition and excitement, this would keep everyone happy
ascarracinguk is offline  
Old 16 Dec 2003, 21:27 (Ref:813457)   #6
f1manoz
Veteran
 
f1manoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Australia
Lincolnshire, UK
Posts: 7,294
f1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridf1manoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Half and half I think. Some courses can have standing starts, some can have rolling starts. Keep up the diversity...
f1manoz is offline  
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die!
Old 16 Dec 2003, 21:52 (Ref:813486)   #7
KC
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
United States
Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 2,762
KC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKC should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I see no reason to go to standing starts. How is it any more safe on standing start where a front car can stall and be struck by a backmarker? At least on a rolling start all the cars a running and noone is missing a shift or stalling out.
KC is offline  
__________________
Never forget #99
Old 16 Dec 2003, 22:11 (Ref:813513)   #8
enemy-ace
Veteran
 
enemy-ace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Canada
toronto, ontario, canada
Posts: 2,739
enemy-ace should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Personally I prefer the standing start from an excitement point of view. I also found it rather frustrating to watch all the starts waived off last year. Therefore I shall respectfully decline.
enemy-ace is offline  
__________________
A torrential afternoon practice session in Watkins Glen saw Villeneuve out-qualify everyone. By 11 seconds.Scheckter stated: "I scared myself rigid that day, I thought I had to be quickest. Then I saw Gilles's time and - I still don't really understand how it was possible. Eleven seconds !"
Old 16 Dec 2003, 22:41 (Ref:813552)   #9
jjspierx
Veteran
 
jjspierx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
United States
Oregon, USA
Posts: 995
jjspierx should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjjspierx should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I prefer standing starts, especially without traction control and launch control. Shows you how good some of the drivers are at putting the power down. Should be exciting to watch if we do see standing starts next year.
jjspierx is offline  
__________________
"You will never know the feeling of a driver when winning a race. The helmet hides feelings that cannot be understood." - Ayrton Senna
Old 16 Dec 2003, 22:53 (Ref:813563)   #10
Phoenix1
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location:
Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 739
Phoenix1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by KC
I see no reason to go to standing starts. How is it any more safe on standing start where a front car can stall and be struck by a backmarker? At least on a rolling start all the cars a running and noone is missing a shift or stalling out.
Last time I did a rolling start I was in P2, leader spun coming out of narrow corner building up heat hit me as did a dumb backmarker who had by the got up speed and lauched me and my kart into a tyre wall. :-S It somewhat hurt. Accidents happen in both types of start. That was bad driving and nothing to do with the type of start but the point is he failed to see the yellow or be careful on a start imagine if I had not taken my hands off the steering well and braced for impact. In F1 each car has a marshall with it and if the driver raises his hand a flag is thrown and the start is (mainly) aborted. I presume CART would also adopt this.

My main issue with rolling starts is the fact they are not practices. Rookies have to got through training for an oval but nothing for rolling starts. Something to look at maybe?
Phoenix1 is offline  
Old 16 Dec 2003, 22:59 (Ref:813569)   #11
ascarracinguk
Veteran
 
ascarracinguk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location:
Infront of my computer
Posts: 3,909
ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!ascarracinguk has a real shot at the championship!
think you mis understud me KC...or i didnt write it right....i meant having rolling starts on ovals and street courses...in my experience...you gotta have em on ovals...cos of tradition and on street courses its safer cos of the lack of room...as you said if someone stalls then mayhem lets loose
ascarracinguk is offline  
Old 16 Dec 2003, 23:00 (Ref:813570)   #12
mark_l
Veteran
 
mark_l's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
England
Posts: 1,646
mark_l should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridmark_l should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I prefer rolling starts for CART.

We have all seen startline pileups where you lose 3-4 cars before the first corner. Imagine if you lost 4 cars from an already thin grid of 18 cars. That would kill the excitement somewhat.

I cant see CART/OWRS red flagging a race after a startline pileup and allowing spare cars to be brought out for the restart
mark_l is offline  
Old 16 Dec 2003, 23:31 (Ref:813602)   #13
Jordi
Veteran
 
Jordi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Catalonia
Vilafranca del Penedés, CATALONIA
Posts: 5,276
Jordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJordi should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I don't care, honestly. Whether ones or the others, I'll watch, anyway.
Jordi is offline  
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport."
-Jim Clark
Old 17 Dec 2003, 00:03 (Ref:813619)   #14
fordtc87
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 72
fordtc87 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Standing, got tired of watching restarts this year. Sorry not to support your petition.
fordtc87 is offline  
Old 17 Dec 2003, 00:27 (Ref:813625)   #15
GP Racer
Veteran
 
GP Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
United States
"The Big Apple"
Posts: 3,376
GP Racer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridGP Racer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Something tells me this won't be high on the priority list of the new owners. They got some problems to work out first.

That said, standing starts are the way to go. With no traction-control, it would be something to watch. To many re-starts also.
GP Racer is offline  
__________________
"I don't feel insecure about 'being girlie'. I do as much media as I can because I want this IRL series to be so kick-butt that NASCAR goes, 'Huh?'"

Danica Patrick
Old 17 Dec 2003, 01:53 (Ref:813649)   #16
Omega99
Veteran
 
Omega99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Canada
9Henday
Posts: 996
Omega99 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Try it, whatever, it doesn't matter to me. OWRS needs to experiment and try new ideas. That's what rebuilding is.
Omega99 is offline  
Old 17 Dec 2003, 03:48 (Ref:813674)   #17
Tailwind
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
United States
Mulvane, KS
Posts: 625
Tailwind should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I prefer standing starts although I do think that rolling starts should be kept on the ovals. F1 has wrecks with the standing starts and we have them with rolling starts. The US 500 in 1996 comes to mind.
Tailwind is offline  
__________________
"The pedal doesn't care what your nationality is" Paul Gentilozzi
Old 17 Dec 2003, 15:42 (Ref:814168)   #18
Snrub
Veteran
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Canada
London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,744
Snrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridSnrub should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
My gut is I'd like to see rolling starts continue, but if OWRS thinks they can do standing starts better than rolling starts I say let them try. Another factor, rolling starts often turn out to be unfair.
Snrub is offline  
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor.
Old 18 Dec 2003, 09:54 (Ref:814932)   #19
StuiE
Veteran
 
StuiE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location:
Perth, WA
Posts: 2,405
StuiE should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The rolling starts were good up until the last two years, but recently there has been wave offs at about every race, If the rolling starts can get back to the consistency of a few years ago, then keep with them, but if not, then give standing starts a go.
StuiE is offline  
__________________
Stu

"I think we broke something.......Traction" -Carl Edwards 19/8/06 MIS

05 - Peter Brock
Old 18 Dec 2003, 10:22 (Ref:814945)   #20
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Rolling starts on streets and standign starts on road courses might be the right compromise. The poor quality rolling starts over the last 2 years have probably been due to an increasing amount of drivers coming in without much experience of them.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Old 21 Dec 2003, 03:57 (Ref:817239)   #21
Hazza
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Hazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Australia
Behind You.
Posts: 4,344
Hazza should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHazza should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHazza should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
You couldn't do a standing start on an oval. I just assumed they'd have rolling starts for the ovals.

(I mean, whats giong to happen if one of the DC cars nails the throttle at the start and slides down the banking - thats not going to work is it?)
Hazza is offline  
__________________
"Abe will be remembered as a fighter" - RIP Abe.
Old 21 Dec 2003, 16:02 (Ref:817500)   #22
Woolley
Race Official
Veteran
 
Woolley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
England
Wolverhampton, England
Posts: 12,447
Woolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameWoolley will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
You need rolling starts on an Oval, no question. Unsuitable gearing, banking, etc, plus the comparative ease of lining them up on an oval mean there's no real argument. On road or street circuits there's for and against both. A stalled car is dangerous from a standing start, onthe other hand the first corner accident is going faster from a rolling start.

The usual deal in Britain is series with turbo cars tend to be rolling starts and atmospheric engines start from standstill. Whether this is a technical or safety issue I couldn't tell you - heat build up, or getting a turbo wound up from nothing, perhaps?
Woolley is offline  
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other.
Old 21 Dec 2003, 22:44 (Ref:817701)   #23
codename_47
Veteran
 
codename_47's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
United Kingdom
Coventry/Birmingham
Posts: 1,213
codename_47 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridcodename_47 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
People are continuing to go on about a stalled car being hit, (happened this year in F1 at Spain didn't it.....but it wasn't too bad since of the cars involved, one was stationary and one was going about 10 M.P.H ) but one thing they are forgetting is Surfers 2002.

That accident wouldn't have been anywhere near as bad if it had happened after a standing start, the cars certainly would'nt have had enough speed for 3 of them to flip!
codename_47 is offline  
__________________
We need to win like you need to breathe....
Old 21 Dec 2003, 22:59 (Ref:817712)   #24
esorniloc
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location:
England
Posts: 1,409
esorniloc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Do they still have standing starts in the Toyota Atlantic series (on roads and streets)?

Anyway there has been so much cheating and bad starting this year they HAVE to move away from rolling starts! And why can't they have Standings starts on ovals?????
esorniloc is offline  
Old 22 Dec 2003, 01:08 (Ref:817848)   #25
jjspierx
Veteran
 
jjspierx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
United States
Oregon, USA
Posts: 995
jjspierx should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjjspierx should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
No, Toyota Altantic does rolling starts NOT standing starts on all circuits..
jjspierx is offline  
__________________
"You will never know the feeling of a driver when winning a race. The helmet hides feelings that cannot be understood." - Ayrton Senna
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Standing starts Kicking-back ChampCar World Series 40 17 Nov 2005 18:52
Standing Or Rolling Starts? GP Racer IRL Indycar Series 36 1 Oct 2004 15:09
Official - No Standing Starts Kicking-back ChampCar World Series 18 17 Feb 2004 23:51
Standing Starts zork ChampCar World Series 1 20 Dec 2003 13:37
Standing Starts? ¡As-de-mim! ChampCar World Series 22 31 Dec 2002 04:31


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.