Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Classic Cars Monthly Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Historic Racing & Motorsport History > Motorsport History

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 May 2001, 23:21 (Ref:94368)   #1
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Australian Group C Touring Cars

As of 1st January 2002, Former Australian Group C Touring cars will be recognised by CAMS as 5th category Historic Cars.

This is something I believe should have happened many years ago. We need to do something about the void period between when a car is contemporary and historic. Many cars are permanently lost during this downtime. I'm sure many Group C cars were chopped up to make Sports Sedans or detuned to make Road cars during the last 17 years and now I'm concerned that Group C races will inevitably and permanently suffer from poor fields.

Unlike other genuine historic classes however, they can't be combined with anything else to make up a full feild. They are simply not compatible with ANY other 5th category class.
DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 20 May 2001, 10:33 (Ref:94438)   #2
Hobson
Veteran
 
Hobson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
England
Notts, UK
Posts: 1,540
Hobson should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHobson should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Do you have any pics of what you are talking about?
I'm picturing a kind of DTM car. Are they like the Classic Thunder on here: www.csccgb.co.uk
Hobson is offline  
__________________
For Sale: Signature line. One owner from new, little use...
Quote
Old 20 May 2001, 22:27 (Ref:94624)   #3
Vitesse
Veteran
 
Vitesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Bath, England
Posts: 791
Vitesse should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridVitesse should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

David, I'm intrigued, but it would help if you could explain what the hell a "Group C touring car" actually is, as in Europe such a class description is a contradiction in terms: Group C to me means sports cars, but sports cars ain't touring cars! What we call touring cars are what you and the Yanks call sedans - so do you see how I have problems visualising this?
I presume we're talking big Holdens and Aussie Fords here ...
Vitesse is offline  
__________________
Good friends we have, Oh, good friends we have lost
Along the way.
In this great future, You can't forget your past

Bob Marley
Quote
Old 25 May 2001, 03:16 (Ref:96337)   #4
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
In 1973 a new class of touring cars was introduced to Australia. It was called Production Touring cars and was a hybrid of the two classes it was replacing, series production (stock standard sedans)and Improved Touring (vaguely similar to Classic Thunder). Actually, it was quite similar to your Group 1.

In 1980 the name was changed to Group C Touring Cars, I don't know why, and the rules were changed slighlty. The only significant differences being some models were added to or removed from the eligibility list and wheel arch flares and spoilers were now allowed.

Of course, big V8 Ford Falcons and Aussie Holdens dominated the racing, but there were many other models also competing. 3 litre class honours were shared by Ford Capri and Mazda Rx-3. 2 litre & 1600cc classes were keenly contested by Ford Escort, Holden Gemini(Vauxhall Chevette), a variety of Japanese cars, especially the Toyota Corolla and even a VW Golf GTi.
DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 25 May 2001, 03:28 (Ref:96338)   #5
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
You're right, of course, that many raced on as Sports Sedans... but there were so many of the things that numbers shouldn't be a real issue...

They're about, or back on the road, perhaps (some of the Capris, for instance), plenty are there somewhere.

Anyway, they'll race with the latter day Group N cars...

And as for Group C, who knows? Another way CAMS has made life difficult in Australia.
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Old 25 May 2001, 08:15 (Ref:96396)   #6
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well Ray, numbers are an issue. Group C Touring Cars have been running outside of the 5th category for the last couple of years and even with only a limited number of meetings per year, they're averaging 8-10 cars per meeting. The cars which became Sports Sedans are almost certainly modified beyond repair and thus lost forever. Also, you must realise that most of these cars weren't famous or valuable in their day so most of those which were demoted to road duty would probably be untraceable today, assuming they haven't been written off after 20 odd years on the road.

As a Group N Historic Touring Car competitor I can assure you that Group C cars would definitely not fit into our races. They are far more modified, with much larger wheels and slick tyres. The speed differential would be dangerous to say the least.

I would love to see a full field of Group C Touring Cars in their own race, but i don't see how it is possible and more so i don't see anything at all being done about preventing Group A cars and early model V8 Tourers from going exactly the same way.
DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 27 May 2001, 15:38 (Ref:97323)   #7
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I bow out of this because there is enough different Historic Touring Car categories...
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Group B & Group S rally cars research TrevorC Motorsport History 18 3 May 2018 05:25
Group "A" RS500 Touring cars at Donington racer2_uk Australasian Touring Cars. 30 13 Jul 2006 22:29
Group C and Group A Touring car Forum groupnxu1 Australasian Touring Cars. 1 22 Nov 2005 05:12
Group 1 Touring Cars...again! apguy Trackside 4 23 Feb 2001 07:38


All times are GMT. The time now is 19:22.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.