|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
3 Sep 2017, 21:07 (Ref:3764274) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 983
|
Quote:
In principle you're right of course it would technically come down to the same. However a few reasons it would be practically different and received more favourable by fans: 1 It hurts the constructor, not the driver as it should. 2 It doesn't mess up the qualification and thus race result. 3 It's generally less intrusive to the Grand Prix weekend. You could do it differently by splitting an absolute penalty in an absolute and relative part. So for instance an engine penalty would mean you lose 5 points plus 5% of your collected constructors points. That way it doesn't overly hit the bottom teams the way absolute constructors penalties would. I would still not let it go negative, but with this approach the chance of that to happen would be much reduced in the first place. I reckon this would be an acceptable compromise, that would go a long way to solving the issues with the current set up while not being too complicated. Last edited by Taxi645; 3 Sep 2017 at 21:14. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Rules] Are more rule changes necessary ? | Marbot | Formula One | 51 | 27 Sep 2009 17:19 |
F1 future rule changes | TheNewBob | Formula One | 57 | 20 Dec 2006 09:19 |
Sensible ideas for future technical regs anyone?/Rule changes - more to come [merged] | AMT | Formula One | 74 | 12 Nov 2002 16:09 |
Future Tourer Future | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 13 | 17 Jul 2002 23:01 |