Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 13 Jun 2004, 19:20 (Ref:1002804)   #1
ViperACR
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location:
toronto
Posts: 83
ViperACR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Vipers - Why were they penalized in SCCA GT

The new Viper car which is now in SCCA GT racing series won there first race on October of 2003 but they immediately had a weight penalty imposed as many were complaining. Why the penalty if they have not won since and why cant they be allowed to race in ALMS.
ViperACR is offline  
__________________
ViperACR
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 20:20 (Ref:1002866)   #2
Fogelhund
Veteran
 
Fogelhund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Canada
Binbrook, ON Canada
Posts: 6,958
Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!
1. Scca Speed World Challenge. This is the way the series operates, through equalization weight penalties, and limitations on the engine. There are few cars in the series that don't have some penalties.

2. ALMS/ACO - The Viper is not legal in the ALMS, because nobody has chosen to have it homologated for racing yet. As it stands, the largest legal engine under GT or GTS rules in the ACO is 8.0l, so the Viper would need to have a reduction in engine size.
Fogelhund is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Jun 2004, 21:13 (Ref:1002928)   #3
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
If the Viper was homologated, the engine can be reduced in size. No need to build more road cars with a 8l engine.

The Viper would not be competitive unless someone like ORECA got involved.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 16:02 (Ref:1003738)   #4
ViperACR
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location:
toronto
Posts: 83
ViperACR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The Viper is competitive right now in the speed world challege series. It won its forst race against the factory cars. so then a weight penalty was added to it. Chrysler is in the process now of getting the cars approved for ALMS for nest year. They would do very well as the cars come from the factory.
ViperACR is offline  
__________________
ViperACR
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 16:14 (Ref:1003750)   #5
RM40
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Maryland
Posts: 234
RM40 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
You're thinking of the Competition Coupe, which races in Speed GT. That is not even a road-legal car, as it doesn't have VIN/serial number (don't remember which), and is a purpose built race car. But they could homologate the SRT-10, if they wanted to.
RM40 is offline  
__________________
"Sebring which - if Le Mans is the heart of our sport - is our sport's soul."
-Leo Hindery
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 16:35 (Ref:1003756)   #6
Fogelhund
Veteran
 
Fogelhund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Canada
Binbrook, ON Canada
Posts: 6,958
Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!
Chrysler getting ready for ALMS next year? Based on news, it certainly doesn't seem likely. Where did you come up with this rumour?

So whats the point with the SWC GT?
Fogelhund is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 17:06 (Ref:1003777)   #7
JAG
Veteran
 
JAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Posts: 10,500
JAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJAG should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Chrysler would need 100 road cars to get the Competition Coupe homoplogated in GT, which is the class it would most likely compete in.

Last edited by JAG; 14 Jun 2004 at 17:07.
JAG is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 18:15 (Ref:1003844)   #8
ViperACR
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location:
toronto
Posts: 83
ViperACR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Read the Car & Driver article from last month and you will see where I get my sources from. It is being negotiated right now. Chrysler wants to get these cars into the ALMS, but they are right now in the SCCA Speed Worls Challenge series against factory cars. They won the first race they entered. Their are 8 Vipers in this series right now and competing well with weight penalties so please stop the ****.
ViperACR is offline  
__________________
ViperACR
Quote
Old 14 Jun 2004, 18:37 (Ref:1003885)   #9
Fogelhund
Veteran
 
Fogelhund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Canada
Binbrook, ON Canada
Posts: 6,958
Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!
Umm, what **** are you referring to? We all know that the Viper competes in the SC WCGT. I'm just not sure what point you are trying to make, if any. The car has weight penalties from stock. So what, so do most of the other cars on the grid, or tires equalization, power restrictions, modification limits... that's what the series is all about.

Regarding the ALMS...

This is the Car & Driver article.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=1

If you read the article carefully, you will see that in fact they are negotiating with GrandAM, not ALMS.

Quote:
There were no entries bearing the Competition Coupe logo at that race (Daytona 24) because it's barred from racing in two of the three premier professional road-racing series—Grand American, which hosts the Daytona race, and American Le Mans. Both of these series have numerous racing classes that ideally each contain cars that are about equally fast. According to the officials we talked to, the Viper Competition Coupe is presently too fast for the slowest classes and not quite quick enough for the fastest. Dodge says it's willing to modify the car and is currently negotiating with those series' sanctioning bodies to determine exactly what changes need to be made.
Of course, in referencing the classes, they are talking about Grand Am SGS and GT. The Viper Coupe most certainly is not faster then a ACO GT car, so whom they are discussing, and negotiating with is quite clear. (Grand Am). There is no reference that they plan on racing the car "next year", in the article either.

As is, there is no real need for negotiating with the ACO/ALMS about this car, there are ZERO road legal versions, which has it fall well short of requirements. Now, if they were talking about the regular Viper, and modifying that for ACO, then they may have a point, but they are not.

I do hope that a Coupe version of the road Viper is built, so that they have the ground work to build a ACO legal Viper, for GTS , but that doesn't seem likely for a few years.
Fogelhund is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jun 2004, 19:39 (Ref:1006201)   #10
73_Gstock
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
United States
Iowa, lovely Iowa
Posts: 191
73_Gstock should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It did win last year, but not in its first race. There were 5 or 6 at Road America last year. Mumford won two races later at Laguna (or was it Sears?).

I think that Mumford was an exceptional talent at Laguna (his home track). This made up for the shortfalls the Viper CC has against the Audi and the M3's last year.
73_Gstock is offline  
__________________
73 Gstock
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2004, 15:08 (Ref:1007044)   #11
ViperACR
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location:
toronto
Posts: 83
ViperACR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I Viper race car is almost exactly the same engine as the road car except for a bigger cam. So I dont see how modifying the SRT would be very difficult, but if Chrysler does not have any intentions on doing this then it really does not matter. How exactly is the car not legal for ALMS. I think it falls within the weight requirements. What needs to be changed
ViperACR is offline  
__________________
ViperACR
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2004, 15:14 (Ref:1007053)   #12
RM40
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Maryland
Posts: 234
RM40 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I believe the engine is too big. The engine is 8.3L, when the ACO GTS/GT limit is 8.0L.
RM40 is offline  
__________________
"Sebring which - if Le Mans is the heart of our sport - is our sport's soul."
-Leo Hindery
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2004, 15:32 (Ref:1007080)   #13
Fogelhund
Veteran
 
Fogelhund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Canada
Binbrook, ON Canada
Posts: 6,958
Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!
In addition to the engine size is that of homologation requirements for road cars.

The standard fare Viper would be fine, assuming the engine was sleaved.

The Competition Coupe has zero cars produced for the road, and would not be allowed per ACO rules.
Fogelhund is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2004, 16:29 (Ref:1007135)   #14
ViperACR
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location:
toronto
Posts: 83
ViperACR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I just read the road and track article that you supplied and it clearly states that chrylser is negotiating with those racing series including ALMS as to the requirements in getting it approved for next years racing schedule.
ViperACR is offline  
__________________
ViperACR
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2004, 17:33 (Ref:1007170)   #15
paul-collins
Veteran
 
paul-collins's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Canada
Mosport on a good day
Posts: 5,147
paul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridpaul-collins should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Fogelhund's point is this: The rules are specific, what's to negotiate? Either they meet numbers or they don't.
paul-collins is offline  
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean?

-Bill James
Quote
Old 17 Jun 2004, 18:03 (Ref:1007187)   #16
Fogelhund
Veteran
 
Fogelhund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Canada
Binbrook, ON Canada
Posts: 6,958
Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!Fogelhund has a real shot at the championship!
Quote:
Originally posted by paul-collins
Fogelhund's point is this: The rules are specific, what's to negotiate? Either they meet numbers or they don't.
...and they reference the Competition Coupe specifically, a car for reasons mentioned above that will never be eligible to run in ACO/ALMS comp.

....and in addition, with an understanding of the GrandAm and ALMS classes, you can see quite clearly the article is speaking clearly of GrandAM, even though ALMS is mentioned.

Actually, the article came from Car&Driver, but where it is from is neither here, nor there.
Fogelhund is offline  
Quote
Old 20 Jun 2004, 02:59 (Ref:1009119)   #17
dj4monie
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
United States
Reseda, California
Posts: 1,790
dj4monie is heading for a stewards' enquiry!
There will be a regular production Viper Coupe. It's the worst kept rumor in Detroit...

The GTS Coupe outsold the roadster two to one when it was in production.

Orcea has been in the driver's seat of this project for several momths. They are just waiting for the go ahead to put the Viper Coupe in production. Right now they are trying to figure out where in the market to place it. I think final word will come down when they see what sales are like for the ZO6 C6 and Ford GT.

You will see a Viper GT-SR by 2006 if not earlier.

But you also have to remember McLaren wants to run the SLR so it depends how much DC has to foot the bill for. If McLaren finds the budget to run the car largely themselves witht he blessing from DC, then that will leave budget for the GTS-R's to be built as soon as the GT-S production starts.

Last edited by dj4monie; 20 Jun 2004 at 03:00.
dj4monie is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Jun 2004, 04:48 (Ref:1012854)   #18
ViperACR
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location:
toronto
Posts: 83
ViperACR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
There is no doubt that the Vipers will be back with a coupe, but you are right it does depend on whether DC wnats the SLR to succeed more than the Viper. But Ferrari owns Maserrati and yet it lets it compete also. We will have to wait and see.
ViperACR is offline  
__________________
ViperACR
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[FIA GT] Vipers in FIA GT ViperACR Sportscar & GT Racing 30 23 Jul 2005 20:53
Ambrose penalized. sukkondat Australasian Touring Cars. 15 14 Nov 2004 09:58
BAR not penalized? slicktoast Formula One 7 17 Aug 2004 08:02
Vipers to quit marcus Sportscar & GT Racing 3 26 Jun 2000 16:04


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:39.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.