|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
25 Jan 2004, 20:21 (Ref:850209) | #1 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 289
|
Ugly Renault
The new Renault is so ugly. In my opinion it was the best looking car last year, and so far is the ugliest this year. It is highly evovled from last year though, especially the very small, aerodynamically efficient sidepods. I expect it to be very fast this year, just too bad that its hideous.
|
||
|
25 Jan 2004, 20:38 (Ref:850227) | #2 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Doesn't matter if it looks uglier, as long as it does a faster laptime.
|
|
|
25 Jan 2004, 21:25 (Ref:850272) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
I think what makes the cars ugly are the bigger airboxes, I preferred last years' ones.
|
||
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark |
25 Jan 2004, 23:44 (Ref:850421) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 493
|
the front end looks fine, but the large engine cover combined with very small sidepods make the car look out of proportion and it is really quite ugly especially with the massive rear wing endplates. true it is not the prettiest car there is but it certainly isnt uglier than the williams or the mclaren. i have a feeling there are not going to be many good looking cars next year, but at least they will be different.
|
||
|
25 Jan 2004, 23:55 (Ref:850433) | #5 | |
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 101
|
Pictures anyone?
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 00:01 (Ref:850439) | #6 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,596
|
The first run, with details and pictures was discussed here: http://tentenths.com/forum/showthrea...threadid=48966
More pictures can be found on f1-live.com http://f1.racing-live.com/en/photos/...tests03d.shtml |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
26 Jan 2004, 00:10 (Ref:850445) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
The jurys still out at the moment, might grow on me....
. |
||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
26 Jan 2004, 00:31 (Ref:850461) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 639
|
Who cares what it looks like.So long as it finishs P1 is all that matters to them.All that matters to me is its faster then the ferrari.
The Grumpy1 |
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 00:40 (Ref:850471) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 5,598
|
Anyone else think it looks kinda Russian?
|
|
|
26 Jan 2004, 00:43 (Ref:850475) | #10 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 289
|
I agree that looks dont matter as long as its fast. Its just that last year it was so sleek and well proportioned. The Williams front nose looks awful, but I think they've discovered something that will prove to be quite fast.
I count on Ferrari to have a design that is both good looking and fast. As always. |
||
|
26 Jan 2004, 01:01 (Ref:850491) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
26 Jan 2004, 01:15 (Ref:850503) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 521
|
I think the yellow around the side pods makes the car look worse than the design actually is...
|
||
__________________
I specialize in the history of small displacement sports racers from France and Italy, circa 1930-1960. |
26 Jan 2004, 02:08 (Ref:850519) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
the nose looks very much cart/irl just raised and the sidepods are absolutely tiny!
|
||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
26 Jan 2004, 02:09 (Ref:850520) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,135
|
It looks damn smooth, i dont think there is a place you could put a rock on the car where it wouldn't slide off
|
||
|
26 Jan 2004, 02:26 (Ref:850527) | #15 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
I think you will find the end product is quite different to the one tested last week . The team has already said the car will be quite radical.
The test car was just that a test car |
||
|
26 Jan 2004, 02:50 (Ref:850539) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,986
|
I still think the Williams was hit with the ugly stick. Last years Renault does look better too, imo. Anyway, as said, its the pace of the car that matters most!
|
||
__________________
Eventually we learn |
26 Jan 2004, 03:17 (Ref:850549) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,188
|
How come nobady talks about how radical that rear wing is. Id say its up there with the FW26 nose but because it is at the back nobody notices.
It is a damn ugly car though |
||
__________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel." |
26 Jan 2004, 03:31 (Ref:850556) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,135
|
They had that rear wing in 2003 anyway. But maybe a bit different
|
||
|
26 Jan 2004, 03:48 (Ref:850565) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
At least it looks different.
|
||
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! |
26 Jan 2004, 03:54 (Ref:850568) | #20 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,685
|
I like the new rear wing . I can not wait to see the full end product
|
||
|
26 Jan 2004, 10:25 (Ref:850800) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Compared to the new Williams, it looks almost beautiful! But, as has been said, it will 'look' a lot better if it is fast!
|
||
|
26 Jan 2004, 10:38 (Ref:850817) | #22 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,206
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Jan 2004, 10:43 (Ref:850826) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
The side view is OK on the Williams, but the front is really awful, the ugliest since the '95 McLaren. Then again, it least they look different!
|
||
|
26 Jan 2004, 10:53 (Ref:850848) | #24 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,206
|
Ah, but the 95 Mclaren was ugly from the side!
|
||
__________________
"It's pure joy. This was the perfect training for the WEC after a summer of not racing, even though the car is faster than LMP2." Nicolas Minassian after lapping at 123mph in the Group C Jaguar XJR-14, setting a new outright lap record for the historic GP circuit at Silverstone Classic in 2013! |
26 Jan 2004, 10:57 (Ref:850854) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Yes, that's true. It was ugly from just about every angle, with the possible exception of from behind, which was a shame, because few of the other drivers got to see it from that angle!!
We should have known there'd be trouble when Mansell said 'if it gos as well as it looks we're in for a good season'! As for the Renault, I just hope it's quick. It would be good to see their rise continue as I'd like to see someone other than the 'Big Three' challenge for (and actually win) the title. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE most ugly car - ever? | gfm | Road Car Forum | 159 | 20 Feb 2006 00:13 |
New WR...not so ugly | billnchristy | Sportscar & GT Racing | 27 | 13 Mar 2004 15:32 |
TVR Good, Bad, The Ugly | Chris Stockdale | Road Car Forum | 41 | 20 Feb 2003 16:39 |