|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Feb 2013, 01:39 (Ref:3210895) | #251 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
I have to say I'm a bit ****ed at RLM and DSC playing this up the way they did. They knew how their tweets would be perceived and knowing what was behind it was setting up people to be disappointed imo...
I know, bills need to be paid and all but still, not cool. |
|
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:42 (Ref:3210897) | #252 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,569
|
http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/artic...acer-for-2014/
I am actually pretty excited about this, it is certainly better for garage 56 than that fire hazard hydrogen car and it could mean Nissan in LMP1 in 2015. The deltawing turned out a lot better than I thought it would, I'm keeping the same hopes for this electric car. |
|
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:44 (Ref:3210898) | #253 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,490
|
Actually, it is bigger than it seems. From a John Dagys story that was just posted:
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:44 (Ref:3210899) | #254 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,296
|
Agree 100%. They are 2-3 years away at least from LMP1.
|
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:48 (Ref:3210900) | #255 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,390
|
So a major global manufacturer announcing a return to the highest echelons of endurance racing isn't worth the hype?
Really???? Honestly guys words fail me. |
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:50 (Ref:3210901) | #256 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Quote:
Nope sorry, not really exciting. And not really needed either. Toyota didn't need it... |
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:54 (Ref:3210903) | #257 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
Jesus some of you just cannot be pleased. Anyone who thought Nissan was going to take on Audi and Toyota with a conventional LMP1 have little idea about how Nissan works. They aren't throwing big money at anything unless it helps them with their road cars. After seeing the tweets I don't remember seeing anything to the effect of them being in LMP1, so I don't know where people even got that notion.
|
|
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:55 (Ref:3210905) | #258 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 834
|
||
__________________
Matra V12 |
26 Feb 2013, 01:56 (Ref:3210906) | #259 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
Toyota didn't have the choice of doing it, and oh yeah, Nissan doesn't have a half billion dollar F1 R&D operation to start with, either.
|
|
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:56 (Ref:3210907) | #260 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
This version of the future just isn't interesting. It isn't even green, so forget that angle. They are trying to create marketing buzz for themselves, instead of actually competing. It will create a fancy marketing/engineering program. No, it didn't measure up to the hype. Outside of Nissan people, and the press people who are close to them, I don't see much except disappointment. Mike Fuller @mulsannescorner Garage 56 as a revolving door for efforts without the fortitude to actually compete? Well played Nissan, well played. |
|||
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:57 (Ref:3210908) | #261 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,296
|
They aren't returning.. yet. Garage 56 is a farce, it takes away focus from the top class which already is a technology showcase. Toyota and Audi are proving up hybrid and diesel technology while racing, competition improves the breed. They using bleeding edge propulsion as well as revolutionary lightweight composites, all within a specific rule set. Why not forego the 2014 parade exercise and come straight into P1 where everyone is starting from scratch with the new ruleset? The answer - hype. They appear to be more of a marketing company than a racing manufacturer.
|
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:58 (Ref:3210910) | #262 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:59 (Ref:3210911) | #263 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 984
|
Agree that there seemed to be a lot of self-induced foreplay happening here for a NISMO LMP1 programme, or GTE.
|
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 01:59 (Ref:3210912) | #264 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,390
|
Toyota build hybridised road cars - Nissan don't - The regs from 2014 essentially make it impossible to be competitive without a hybrid and as I've just said Nissan aren't just making their point on paper about the relevance of the tech, they're going to do it on the track
|
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:00 (Ref:3210913) | #265 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
Moot point, Peugeot didn't have one either, and Audi isn't exactly in-house either. Nissan is a top 10 manufacturer by the numbers so it's not some sort of David vs. Goliath thing.
|
|
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:02 (Ref:3210914) | #266 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:02 (Ref:3210915) | #267 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 41
|
I think a lot of people here have set their expectation levels too high and if they don't get exactly what they want then they're bound to be disappointed.
Admittedly I thought it was going to be a GTE reveal but I haven't let myself get caught up in the hype so I'm not bothered either way as GTE is varied enough as it is. The fact that Nissan are preparing a possible P1 challenger though is great news and it's just what the category needs, if it takes a G56 entry to make that happen then so be it. |
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:02 (Ref:3210916) | #268 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 834
|
||
__________________
Matra V12 |
26 Feb 2013, 02:03 (Ref:3210917) | #269 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:05 (Ref:3210918) | #270 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
|||
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:05 (Ref:3210919) | #271 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
And no risk attached. You just have to feel bad for Toyota, they do it the right way with all the risks involved, including the possibility of complete failure.
And meanwhile Nissan sucks all the PR out of the event they can get without actually racing competitively...for the second time now. |
|
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:09 (Ref:3210923) | #272 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
Peugeot did it because it served a purpose for their road cars and there was a bit of nationalistic pride as well. Those are two factors lacking in Nismo's case.
|
|
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:10 (Ref:3210924) | #273 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,999
|
What I do like about this is that Nissan have committed to actually putting pen to paper and building something vs the DW route.
So that's a net gain in a sense and let's see where it goes. They are clearly committed to LM/Sportscar racing - albeit from that different angle. If it is PR, I'd rather they were trying to build racing cars than making robots or something. I am sceptical about a P1 return. I think they had to say that so people (and the ACO) didn't think they were taking the mick. They are easy words to say, but DC hasn't said them before until now. IF this latest effort is of P1 pace then it's a big story. When you get in the bubble (and I'm super guilty of this) you can't always see it but you end up blasting manufacturers who are spending money in this arena when there are so many that aren't. |
|
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:11 (Ref:3210925) | #274 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,767
|
||
|
26 Feb 2013, 02:12 (Ref:3210926) | #275 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,296
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The never ending Toyota return to Le Mans (LMP1) Saga | The Badger | ACO Regulated Series | 6844 | 8 Jan 2014 02:19 |
[LM24] Nissan GT-R at the Le Mans 24 Hours race? | baszero | 24 Heures du Mans | 37 | 14 Mar 2013 11:52 |
[LM24] BEHIND THE SCENES with NISSAN preparing LE MANS 2012 with WINNER OF LE MANS 2011 | JackJack | 24 Heures du Mans | 2 | 31 May 2012 07:17 |
[LM24] When do you think Porsche will return to Le Mans? | H16 | 24 Heures du Mans | 3 | 14 Nov 2001 10:38 |