Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 May 2001, 10:37 (Ref:95125)   #1
mtpanorama
Veteran
 
mtpanorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Australia
Bathurst (best racetrack in the world)
Posts: 2,485
mtpanorama should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Production Cars

Quote:
GTP grieves me, but I guess I can't change that.
Well that is as good a way as any to start a new topic.

Ray, why dont you like production cars?
Personally it is probably my favorite catagory. The mix of makes and models, battles between 2wd, 4wd, turbo, v8's etc.
There is alway passing, people trying desperate moves and a bit of pushing and shoving. It is great to see the little cars beating the big ones, Xr6 falcons beating V8 commodores.
I have been around production cars for the past 10 years and have always found them to be an excellent catagory to watch and to be around.
So what is everyone elses opinion?
mtpanorama is offline  
__________________
I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder

I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good, either
Quote
Old 22 May 2001, 11:39 (Ref:95150)   #2
Kartracer
Rookie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Sydney
Posts: 39
Kartracer should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
GTP Rocks!!!!
Kartracer is offline  
Quote
Old 22 May 2001, 13:08 (Ref:95175)   #3
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Here's a phrase for you....

"My take on this is..." that the class is there to interest the public at large. With a wide range of cars so that people see something related to what they drive on the circuit.

But the execution of it is such a hotch-potch of classes and sub-classes, and the restrictive nature of the apparent rules (you can race a Falcon with this, but not with that etc), mean that there's no real relevance and it's difficult to follow the races from that point of view.

The classic production racing of the past saw anything with the production numbers able to race, the top-line cars of the range were the ones chosen and you knew the playing field.

It's so complicated today that it's really difficult to know where the cars stand. It therefore fails.
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Old 22 May 2001, 13:36 (Ref:95182)   #4
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
That is all true Ray. They've decided to turn humble production cars into a parity class. Which really does defeat the purpose of the exercise.

I was actually talking to someone who screwed together one of the race winning cars at Wakefield tonight, and the biggest expense they had over the weekend was the Procar entry fees, which were into the thousands.

Then again, they seem to be on a winner. They have competitors lining up to be a part of the classes, they have their own race meetings, and they provide good racing for the fans....
Crash Test is offline  
__________________
Love you long time
Quote
Old 23 May 2001, 11:08 (Ref:95491)   #5
mac
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,702
mac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridmac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridmac should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
GTP is tremendous!!!

I love the V8Supercars, but it can get a bit repetitive when that is all you see.

It's great to see Ferraris, Porsches, Lambos and Vipers (Nations Cup), as well as HSVs, Fords, Mitsubishis, Subarus, Hondas, Nissans, Toyotas and BMWs on the track. It's very interesting, pretty good racing and fun to watch (as well as no massive wings and bits sticking out everywhere).
mac is offline  
Quote
Old 24 May 2001, 12:00 (Ref:95954)   #6
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Crash and Ray are on to something here. Production cars should be absolutely bog stock, it should NOT be a parity class. If one car dominates, then it is obviously better and that's OK. Parity is a form of sporting socialism.
DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 24 May 2001, 12:23 (Ref:95970)   #7
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Sure are... but I've been around for a while and seen it all before. Mostly we've seen (I assume some things here, but I guess Crash has too) what doesn't work.

Because that's usually what they do, CAMS and the 'promoters'.. go for stuff that won't sell.
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Production Cars Tiring SPOONERBORO Touring Car Racing 5 23 Sep 2001 21:04
Toe-In in production cars? touringlegend Touring Car Racing 8 15 Sep 2001 09:37


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:59.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.