|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
29 Jun 2006, 10:13 (Ref:1644060) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
BF or BA
based on an article in the courier mail ( as mentioned in another forum)
if the Ford BA win this weekend it will be its 25th win equal to the sierra's and only one win behind the VT the most winninist model ever. the v8 rules say the BF is an acceptable vehicle in v8s, but if you read the time sheets at Natsoft or v8 supercars is says the car is BA and i went to all the key ford teams web sites and none mention the BF I realise the differences are minimal if any, but does anyone know why the ford teams are running under BA instead of BF? |
|
|
29 Jun 2006, 10:33 (Ref:1644067) | #2 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,105
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
29 Jun 2006, 10:59 (Ref:1644084) | #3 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 738
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
29 Jun 2006, 12:07 (Ref:1644120) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,105
|
Quote:
And the 2 years of Godzilla domination only came after 3 years of the Sierra being almost untouchable, can only recall 1 non Ford win in each of 88 and 89. |
|||
|
29 Jun 2006, 12:13 (Ref:1644124) | #5 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 965
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Some days you are the bug, some days you are the windshield. |
29 Jun 2006, 13:11 (Ref:1644156) | #6 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 482
|
Amen RS500
|
|
|
29 Jun 2006, 13:21 (Ref:1644164) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,208
|
That must be the reason FPR/888 have stuck with the "BA", to get that stat before updating to the BF. Updating to the BF is trivial isn't it? I can't see why they wouldn't do it, if not for this.
|
||
|
29 Jun 2006, 20:48 (Ref:1644429) | #8 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 364
|
The submission for the updates is minimal changes to the front and rear bumpers and a change to the side skirt, which I think they want to be a little more aero like similar to the holden skirts.
Popular demand sees that the Bonnet bulge is likely to stay. There maybe a change in the structure to the rear wing to make it more stable. |
|
|
30 Jun 2006, 02:44 (Ref:1644572) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 777
|
Quote:
We need races entered vs races won for a better (but still not perfect)comparison, I suspect the mightly little Sierra would come out on top. |
||
__________________
Kieron |
30 Jun 2006, 03:21 (Ref:1644584) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
CK its round wins, not race wins
|
|
|
30 Jun 2006, 03:53 (Ref:1644597) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 777
|
Thanks pec. Still, there were less rounds per year back in the Sierra days, Bathurst was also not a round of the ATCC back the neither
|
|
__________________
Kieron |
30 Jun 2006, 08:32 (Ref:1644683) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,105
|
Quote:
Don't know exactly how may meetings Sierras were entered in from 87 to 92, but I think even in the bad days of the early 90's there were at least 9 ATCC rounds, so adding the Grand Prix and 2 enduros there were at least 12 meetings per year, giving the Sierra a succes rate of no more than 35%. |
|||
|
30 Jun 2006, 08:52 (Ref:1644694) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 738
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
30 Jun 2006, 18:25 (Ref:1645138) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,040
|
When talking Sierra's, remember two different Sierra models were used betweem 1987 and 1992 (in terms of ATCC rounds);
1987 -> Ford Sierra Cosworth 1988 - 1992 -> Ford Sierra Cosworth RS500 In fairness of course, it only affects one race win (Johnson at Adelaide International Raceway in 1987) |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
1 Jul 2006, 11:24 (Ref:1645587) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,003
|
A VX that is a VT supercar, that has virtually zero to do with a VT SS, and a VY/Z supercar that is a VX supercar with Ford style front suspension with or with out new engine....
Good to see that BA can undo the bad sportsmanship of the HMS empire and their use of lawyers to obtain and vigourously defend their supercar parity advantage. |
||
__________________
FALCON UNBELIEVABLE |
2 Jul 2006, 01:57 (Ref:1645963) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 777
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Kieron |
2 Jul 2006, 11:11 (Ref:1646145) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,196
|
Quote:
It's their God-Given Right, man!!!!!! Get with the system. |
||
__________________
"You can get lucky and win one championship but not two ..." Jamie Whincup. I wonder which person with the initials RK he was referring to. |
3 Jul 2006, 07:54 (Ref:1647063) | #18 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 154
|
Quote:
A VX that is a VT supercar, that has virtually zero to do with a VT SS, and a VY/Z supercar that is a VX supercar with Ford style front suspension with or with out new engine.... Yes and lets remember that the Sierra featured a Hollinger 6 speed gearbox and a 9 inch diff.......they were a bit fragile before they inherited these right? They were also built for a much larger market and based on a much more ideal base package and helped by a set rules that never came up with a fair method of equalising turbo cars. But other than that........ |
||
|
3 Jul 2006, 11:49 (Ref:1647230) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 777
|
I thought the Sierras ran 5spd Getrags. The diff homolgated by Johnson/Harrop was a 9" centre with custom housing, which became the diff for the V8's,
The original diff was certainly fragile but the new one caused understeer problems, would have been an interesting car to drive with its narrow torque curve as well! |
|
__________________
Kieron |
3 Jul 2006, 14:43 (Ref:1647368) | #20 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,105
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Jul 2006, 07:24 (Ref:1648596) | #21 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 18
|
Comparison
Sierra RS500 1987- ??5 Enduro's: 2wins AGP: 1win 1988- 9 ATCC Rounds: 9wins 5 Enduro's: 3wins AGP: 0wins 1989- 8 ATCC Rounds: 7wins 5 Enduro's: 3wins AGP: 1win 1990- 8 ATCC Rounds: 5wins 5 Enduro's: 2wins AGP: 1win 1991- 9 ATCC Rounds: 0wins 4 Enduro's: 0wins AGP: 0wins 1992- 9 ATCC Rounds: 4wins 4 Enduro's: 0wins TC/AGP: 1win TOT= 43 ATCC Rounds 25wins at 58% 78 Events 39wins at 50% VT Commodore 1998- 3 ATCC Rounds: 2wins 2 Enduro's: 1win Indy: 0wins 1999- 13 ATCC Rounds: 11wins Indy/AGP: 1win 2000- 13 ATCC Rounds: 12wins Indy/AGP: 1win 2001- 13 ATCC Rounds: 1win Indy/AGP: 0wins TOT= 42 ATCC Rounds 26wins at 62% 51 Events 29wins at 57% BA Falcon XR8 2003- 13 ATCC Rounds: 9wins AGP: 1win 2004- 13 ATCC Rounds: 6wins AGP: 0wins 2005- 13 ATCC Rounds: 7wins AGP: 0wins 2006- 5 ATCC Rounds: 3wins AGP: 0wins TOT= 44 ATCC Rounds 25wins at 57% 48 Events 26wins at 54% Notes: *TC=Triple Challenge *In 2001 both Faulkner and Romano drove the entire year in VT's. Morris drove a VT up untill the Indy Support Races. Since both drivers were Level 1 teams, I included that year. *When the AGP and Indy held more than one race, I calculated what would be the total points for those events and declared a winner for the weekend. *A Sierra did win a round of the ATCC in 1987, and competed all year, however it was only an RS. *During 1987 there were three rounds of the WTCC, 2 won by the Eggenberger RS500's, as Bathurst was one of these, they are included. *These stats do not take into account AMSCAR and Development Series races. |
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 08:46 (Ref:1648655) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,105
|
The VT was not Holden's front line weapon in 01 with all the main Holden teams running the VX, which dare I say it probably had a similar win rate. I don't think Faulkner and Romano were ever going to be in contention for race wins in 2001, and Morris was a one time wonder.
So 28 event wins from 37 events @ 76% is a fairer indication. |
||
|
5 Jul 2006, 09:37 (Ref:1648708) | #23 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 18
|
True, I knew that the VT had been replaced, and that those drivers were not "top class". However, I do not think that Morris was a one-hit wonder. But to consider the records and number of wins that the VT took, we need to take into account 2001.
|
|
|
5 Jul 2006, 11:47 (Ref:1648809) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,105
|
When the VX was Holden's front line car in 01/02 it won 21 of 29 races a 72% win rate, throw in the Morris win this goes up to 76%. I guess the other way of looking at it is that the AU Falcon only won 24% of the races it was entered in from 99 to 02.
It would be a little unfair to water the VXs rate down by including all the races until the end of 04, just because the back marker Rod Nash team was fielding a VX. And I think 1 win from 91 starts in over 7 seasons fits the bill of one hit wonder. |
||
|
6 Jul 2006, 07:59 (Ref:1649413) | #25 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 18
|
I was not trying to spark animosity or anything.
The VT was a very successful car. You obviously wanted to here that. But the truth is that the AU was not capable of competing with the VT and the AU only caught up with the VX when they gave it a Holden splitter tray. During the 80's the Sierra was created to use the Group A rules to great effect. It had little competition until the GT-R arrived and could only win against "Godzilla" when CAMS twisted the rules to provide a better show. The BA shares certain parts with the VZ and the previous Commodore's. With that in mind, both the Holden's and Ford's have been "equal." So to win 57% of the races is something to keep in mind. |
|
|