Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 Oct 2005, 11:37 (Ref:1443845)   #1
Ingsy
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 397
Ingsy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Argentine GP from 2007? - Too many races?

Full story here: http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=34440
Apparently saying that Argentina wants to host a GP again from 2007.

With Fuji possibly hosting another race, Mexico, Russia, India and South Africa also interested we could see a season with up to 24 races in. Do you think this is too many?

If some existing races were to go to make room for others, which would you prefer to see disappear?
Ingsy is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 11:42 (Ref:1443852)   #2
Bononi
Race Official
20KPINAL
 
Bononi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location:
Deep in the Chaos Nation's countryside
Posts: 21,606
Bononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameBononi will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
A season with 24 races ???

That won't happen.
Bononi is offline  
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman
An' I'll show you somebody who will
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 11:44 (Ref:1443854)   #3
WapFlap
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Netherlands
The Netherlands
Posts: 162
WapFlap should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Imola, Hungary and Hockenheim. All those tracks are not good enough for F1 anymore, due to the fact that they are too small (hungary) or the fact that they are not providing good races anymore ( Imola since the chicanes etc. and Hockenheim since its not Hockenheim anymore)
WapFlap is offline  
__________________
<blank>
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 12:04 (Ref:1443867)   #4
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Ron Dennis said before a recent teams meeting that most teams don't want more than 18 races, because of the impact it has on the lives of their employees


Hockenheim always provides good racing, incidentally, although I could easily do without Hungary and Imola
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 12:05 (Ref:1443869)   #5
shiny side up!
Veteran
 
shiny side up!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
United States
Ann Arbor
Posts: 1,332
shiny side up! should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
There are consant stories about Spa losing its race (tragic), and it seems Imola has been on the list for a while, too. I would disagree with Hockenheim... I will admit that I don't like the nature of the new track compared to its classic layout, but it has provided good races in the past couple of years, has a good attendance and good TV ratings, and has a lot of support from BMW and Mercedes.

I wouldn't mind seeing Hungary off the calendar, it is such a boring track... but I would hate it for the Hungarian fans.
shiny side up! is offline  
__________________
Juliette Bravo! Juliette Bravo!!!!
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 12:30 (Ref:1443896)   #6
Marbot
Retired
20KPINAL
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
United Kingdom
Posts: 22,897
Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiny side up!

I wouldn't mind seeing Hungary off the calendar, it is such a boring track... but I would hate it for the Hungarian fans.
The Hungarians don't have far to travel in order to see an F1 race of much better quality.

By the way,your avatar is scary.
Marbot is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 12:52 (Ref:1443914)   #7
safc_fan89
Veteran
 
safc_fan89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,936
safc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridsafc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ingsy
Full story here: http://www.itv-f1.com/News_Article.aspx?PO_ID=34440
Apparently saying that Argentina wants to host a GP again from 2007.

With Fuji possibly hosting another race, Mexico, Russia, India and South Africa also interested we could see a season with up to 24 races in. Do you think this is too many?

If some existing races were to go to make room for others, which would you prefer to see disappear?
There will never be 24 races in a season.

I'd get rid of San Marino, Nurburgring, Hungary, Magny-Course (surely there's a better track somewhere in France, ie. Paul Ricard or Le Mans), and swap Indy for Watkins Glen or Laguna Seca.
safc_fan89 is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 14:44 (Ref:1444018)   #8
Rob29
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
Lincolnshire,UK
Posts: 3,345
Rob29 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridRob29 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by safc_fan89
There will never be 24 races in a season.

.
Don't see why not.NASCAR do about 38 meetings from Mid feb-Mid Nov.In 1972 most F1 teams did 20 meetings. In the 60s some managed even more with 8 in Aus/NZ.
Less testing-more racing-if teams are paid per race I think most will opt for more races?
Rob29 is offline  
__________________
Do it in the streets!
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 16:27 (Ref:1444099)   #9
nickyf1
Veteran
 
nickyf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Scotland
City of Glasgow, Scotland, UK
Posts: 4,765
nickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridnickyf1 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by martyn bott

By the way,your avatar is scary.
its hypnotic!
careful with that someone might get a seziure!
nickyf1 is offline  
__________________
'My lovely horse, running through the fields! Where are you going, with your fetlocks blowing in the wind?'
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 17:28 (Ref:1444134)   #10
Marbot
Retired
20KPINAL
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
United Kingdom
Posts: 22,897
Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by safc_fan89
There will never be 24 races in a season.
hmmm....famous last words. I seem to be doing a lot of hmmming today.
Marbot is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 17:43 (Ref:1444152)   #11
Russ-Turner
Racer
 
Russ-Turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
England
Motorsport Valley.
Posts: 269
Russ-Turner should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
One of Flav's suggestions last year was scrap testing as we know it and keep the three day G.P. weekend by using the Friday for testing, Saturday for practice and qualifying and Sunday as race day. Sounds good to me.
Russ-Turner is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 17:49 (Ref:1444164)   #12
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
24 full weekends away from families is quite a big deal for teams today - so many of their staff have young families. Workign during the week lcoally (as in testing) is much less of a big deal from that perspective. Teams need every mechanic working together in a well-drilled and motivated team today, they can't chop adn change as they did in the old days. And quite frequently back-to-back races mean spending 2 full weeks away from families, whcih must be torture. NASCAR isn't a good comparison because the races are all within one country, usually a short flight away if that.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 17:52 (Ref:1444170)   #13
Marbot
Retired
20KPINAL
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
United Kingdom
Posts: 22,897
Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russ-Turner
One of Flav's suggestions last year was scrap testing as we know it and keep the three day G.P. weekend by using the Friday for testing, Saturday for practice and qualifying and Sunday as race day. Sounds good to me.
Does to me too.
But you can't let common sense stand in the way of millions of dollars of sponsorship money.
Marbot is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 18:01 (Ref:1444186)   #14
davyboy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
davyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
NASCAR manage to do a lot more races, often involving greater distances than the F1 circus and let's face it... selling sponsorship for 24 races is a lot easier and lucrative than 16, isn't it ? Here's how to do it practically.

Scrap testing.
Make the GP a 3 day event, with Friday confined to testing only.
Alternate fly-away races with European races so that you have a race every 2 weeks, but only a fly-away or European race every 4 weekends.
With the exception of the drivers, each equipe has two teams - one for flyaways, one for European races.
The only heavy travellers will be the team principles and the drivers... who, let's face it get paid enough to bring their families with them if they so desire.

So common' guys, nominate me for Max's job next time round !
davyboy is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 19:56 (Ref:1444363)   #15
safc_fan89
Veteran
 
safc_fan89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,936
safc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridsafc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob29
Don't see why not.NASCAR do about 38 meetings from Mid feb-Mid Nov.In 1972 most F1 teams did 20 meetings. In the 60s some managed even more with 8 in Aus/NZ.
Less testing-more racing-if teams are paid per race I think most will opt for more races?
Money is no substitute to missing out on family life. Or shouldn't be, anyway.
safc_fan89 is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 20:42 (Ref:1444417)   #16
chillibowl
Veteran
 
chillibowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Canada
winnipeg, canada
Posts: 9,716
chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Quote:
Originally Posted by safc_fan89
Money is no substitute to missing out on family life. Or shouldn't be, anyway.
agreed. as much as i want them to race every weekend it just cant happen. the race team and the ones back at the factory work hectic scheduals. if they dont get some down time mistakes will be made and no one wants that.

really the only solution for more than 20 races has to be a longer mid season break that has to be enforced.
chillibowl is online now  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 20:52 (Ref:1444424)   #17
davyboy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
davyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Chilli I'm not so sure. I think the budgets these teams have make it more than possible. Think about it. Minardi's budget for the year would make you a front runner in any other series. If they add more races to the season, its better for us fans... and the teams rake in a lot more money. With more cost-cutting too, they can absolutely afford to run multiple teams and cars a la NASCAR and still allow their team members a family life. Airline crews have far more rigorous arrangements and there are a lot more of them, getting paid a lot less, in comparison to F1 teams.
davyboy is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 21:02 (Ref:1444436)   #18
safc_fan89
Veteran
 
safc_fan89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,936
safc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridsafc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Team bosses are already complaining about the length of an F1 season. I can't see them being too thrilled about having 5 FURTHER race weekends to cram in. I wouldn't mind of course, but it's not practical.
safc_fan89 is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 21:14 (Ref:1444458)   #19
chillibowl
Veteran
 
chillibowl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Canada
winnipeg, canada
Posts: 9,716
chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!chillibowl is the undisputed Champion of the World!
i thinks its too diffficult to compare the number of races between nascar and f1. a large part of nascar's appeal comes from the grassroots atmosphere a majority of teams employ. they are family run/or relativley small business affairs. you bring your family and whole team with you (and thats is mainly because the distances travelled are much smaller) f1 is just too different.

for me im just worried that more races will result in a lower quality product.
chillibowl is online now  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 21:17 (Ref:1444466)   #20
safc_fan89
Veteran
 
safc_fan89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,936
safc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridsafc_fan89 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillibowl
i thinks its too diffficult to compare the number of races between nascar and f1. a large part of nascar's appeal comes from the grassroots atmosphere a majority of teams employ. they are family run/or relativley small business affairs. you bring your family and whole team with you (and thats is mainly because the distances travelled are much smaller) f1 is just too different.

for me im just worried that more races will result in a lower quality product.
Well I don't think that 2005's poor races are down to the longer season, but I see your point.

The main point is, is there actually any reason to have a season woth 20+ rounds? 16 was enough for me in the past, 19 is more than enough. In any case, the new tracks would be just as bland and tedious as the current ones. 20 should be the maximum. There has to be a limit. F1 is not NASCAR.
safc_fan89 is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 21:17 (Ref:1444467)   #21
Nintendo
Racer
 
Nintendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Ireland
Dublin
Posts: 377
Nintendo has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
my eyes, my beautiful eyes.
Nintendo is offline  
__________________
I'm semi evil, i'm quasi evil. I am the Diet Coke of evil. just one calorie, not evil enough.
Quote
Old 26 Oct 2005, 22:07 (Ref:1444531)   #22
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by davyboy
NASCAR manage to do a lot more races, often involving greater distances than the F1 circus and let's face it... selling sponsorship for 24 races is a lot easier and lucrative than 16, isn't it ? Here's how to do it practically.

Scrap testing.
Make the GP a 3 day event, with Friday confined to testing only.
Alternate fly-away races with European races so that you have a race every 2 weeks, but only a fly-away or European race every 4 weekends.
With the exception of the drivers, each equipe has two teams - one for flyaways, one for European races.
The only heavy travellers will be the team principles and the drivers... who, let's face it get paid enough to bring their families with them if they so desire.

So common' guys, nominate me for Max's job next time round !
This is pretty illogical. 24 races would cost more than 16 (or 19), epsecially as so many new rounds would be fly-away events, and would sponsors pay any extra for under-supported events.

NASCAR doesn't involve advanced team-developed technology or a huge variety of races, so the technical challenge is minor by comparison. Also, with 24 races and regular 2-week breaks, surely that means only a 6-week winter break for teams to perfect their new cars?

Having two seperate pitcrews isn't really practical either - teams can't function without guys like Ross Brawn there, and hiring enough quality staff and gelling them into two tightly knit teams would be a huge task. Also, put yourself in the shoes of a mechanic, watching a race on TV knowing that you should be involved in it, especially if your stand-in makes a mistake?
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Oct 2005, 07:54 (Ref:1444808)   #23
davyboy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
davyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by BootsOntheSide
This is pretty illogical. 24 races would cost more than 16 (or 19), epsecially as so many new rounds would be fly-away events, and would sponsors pay any extra for under-supported events.
Not illogical at all. Sponsorship money is a function of TV air-time... that's why a 3x4 sticker on a Minardi is so much less than the same thing on a Renault. Also, more TV-airtime=more opportunity for TV-company ads=higher TV revenue=more money for the teams. The differential revenue over cost would be quite pronouced.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BootsOntheSide
NASCAR doesn't involve advanced team-developed technology or a huge variety of races, so the technical challenge is minor by comparison. Also, with 24 races and regular 2-week breaks, surely that means only a 6-week winter break for teams to perfect their new cars?
If there was a 6 month winter break, teams would spend it in development... if there was a 2 week winter break, teams would spend it doing less development. There's no reason to have such a monster step change from one year to the next unless there are regulation changes one year to the next. If regulations were introduced on a rolling basis instead of one year to the next, then teams could work in a constant development [and testing] mode over the course of the year without big bang steps one year to the next. Even if that's not possible, many teams still manage to launch brand new cars in the middle of a season, so a shorter winter break would not be a problem.


Quote:
Originally Posted by BootsOntheSide
Having two seperate pitcrews isn't really practical either - teams can't function without guys like Ross Brawn there, and hiring enough quality staff and gelling them into two tightly knit teams would be a huge task. Also, put yourself in the shoes of a mechanic, watching a race on TV knowing that you should be involved in it, especially if your stand-in makes a mistake?
All teams have fully independent test teams that function perfectly well without their strategists. Those test teams are perfectly competent to run a car at a race I would think. What's more Ross [and his peers] have not been to every single race... and those that they were absent from, their teams were still successful at. Another thing, if their involvement really were essential, they could do it remotely. Right now, they spend most of their race looking at TVs on the pit-wall... they could do that from the comfort of their beds... like we do.

I think its important to think radical and improve the entertainment value.
davyboy is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Oct 2005, 08:26 (Ref:1444832)   #24
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
More races is a bad thing for another reason - you should always leave the viewer wanting more, rather than give them F1 fatigue
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Oct 2005, 08:51 (Ref:1444850)   #25
davyboy
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,986
davyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famedavyboy will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
There's no sign of viewer fatigue in NASCAR, in fact quite the contrary, and they've a lot more than 20 races a year. There's certainly the demand for more F1, no question.
davyboy is offline  
Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ferrari in 2007 pink69 Formula One 135 19 May 2006 20:59
Two races for Japan in 2007? Marbot Formula One 15 4 May 2006 00:15
Changes To The WRC from 2007 onwards rdjones Rallying & Rallycross 1 26 Oct 2005 14:21
2007 rules david_james2000 Formula One 31 27 Sep 2004 21:22
Revised Argentine Rally Results. Speeddemon555 Rallying & Rallycross 10 24 May 2002 20:22


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:52.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.