Thread: WTCC Equalisation...
View Single Post
Old 15 Apr 2009, 08:59 (Ref:2441127)   #13
awrb
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
United Kingdom
Birmingham, UK
Posts: 809
awrb should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by touring fan01 View Post
Anyone would be very naive if they didn't think that the drivers of the fastest cars out there don't play that game, so that they are not weighed down with a reduction in their performance.

Thats why a results based formula is better. Because they are not going to throw away race results are they?
If the drivers are holding back in the SEATs, then they're playing the rules aren't they, which is what you've got to do in any sport.

If you use a results based formula, lets say the SEAT's are all leading by miles, lapping some back-markers and one of the back-markers takes a SEAT out, and the rest of the SEAT's all pile into one another because they were in their long train formation, and it means non of them can start the second race. For the next meeting, the SEAT's would be -60Kg and so would run away with it, while the BMW's and Chevy's are fully loaded. The current system takes the racing out of the ballast system and looks purely at pace.
awrb is offline  
Quote