Quote:
Originally Posted by Sodemo
Why 1.6?
Why not 2.0L?
|
I think because a smaller engine, at least in theory, is less expensive. Also, remember that when you think about the turbo, you always have to multiply it by 1.7. So 1.6*1.7= 2.7. I believe the turbo is standard, in order to get the costs down, which would be good. Does anybody have an idea wether it's true or not?