Quote:
Originally Posted by crmalcolm
One example would be John Cook, Dana Nuccitelli Sarah A Green, Mark Richardson, Bärbel Winkler, Rob Painting, Robert Way, Peter Jacobs and Andrew Skuce - who found in 2013 that 97% of 12,000 published peer-reviewed papers 'said that global warming is happening and human-caused, at least in part.'
Or Mark Lynas, Benjamin Z Houlton and Simon Perry - who found that in 2021 that there is now a 'Greater than 99% consensus on human caused climate change in [...] peer-reviewed scientific literature'.
|
And that is exactly the problem, the peers are singing from the same hymnsheet hence they won't disagree.
And what "factual errors" were in that report? Please identify. Was it the increase in Carbon and or the increased installation of renewables, or was it the increased temperatures? And if possible identify what organisation the identifiers are employed by. Again all you are doing is shutting down debate. Your post doesn't offer an argument.