[Articus]

As was mentioned earlier, I really think a common set of the regulations, minus the hybrid systems for IMSA is a nice solution. The IMSA manufactures don't want hybrids. At the same time, Honda Japan and Toyota Japan don't have any incentive to help support the IMSA projects if the prototypes are not common on some level. The hybrid systems are a large part of the cost. Earlier we were trying to figure out how ACO could cut another 5-10 million out of the program cost specifically for the IMSA manufacturers and teams. This seems like a good compromise.

Acura could race IMSA, and rebadge as the Honda with the hybrid system for WEC if they wanted. This is how you can get a collaboration between Honda NA and Honda Global. Much easier to develop the car jointly when both entities have something to gain from it.

Lexus could race IMSA, and rebadge as the Toyota with the Hybrid system for WEC if they wanted. This is how you can get a collaboration between Lexus/TRD NA and Toyota Japan entities. Same concept. Both entities have something to gain from joint development of the car.

Ford could do both with no hybrid for IMSA. Ford don't really seem to have a problem with the 20 million potential programme cost, they just care that they can race in IMSA and WEC with the same car.

Didn't Audi have the R18s with and without the hybrid system a few years ago? It shows that a common vehicle can be developed around both powertrains.

Agree? Disagree?