View Single Post
Old 19 Jan 2018, 23:36 (Ref:3793890)   #34
Lanky Turtle
Veteran
 
Lanky Turtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location:
Between Daytona and Sebring
Posts: 770
Lanky Turtle should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridLanky Turtle should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridLanky Turtle should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridLanky Turtle should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjvincent View Post
In 2016, I had the start and park program for GS. This was a fantasy team that only ran the minimal amount of time and a driver change. So each race consisted of 50 minutes of run time and them park the car. That year, I would have finished 5th in GS points and got around $30K in prize money. With IMSA only paying the top 5 now, the prize money is not good but I'll keep a season total and see what the start and park program garners in ST for this year.

Best part for ST is it's only 3 teams and one has 3 cars entered. So, the chance of all 5 making it past the 50 minute mark for the season is not going to happen. So, I know that a 6th is an automatic but i might be on the tail of 5th. When I did this in GS, I almost took 4th and that was from a car that ran the whole season.

Yes ST went from 20 to 5 for this year but GS went from 21 to 31. On the other hand, I ran there when over 50 were in ST for that race and at least 40 full time cars. I'm glad I got to run in that class when it was at a record high. Those days are now gone.
Why have so many teams abandoned ST John? Is it just because this is the last year for the class? With so much talk of how disproportionately expensive the budgets for GT3 cars have become, it would seem like ST would be a far cheaper and more popular class. It's weird to have a CTSC race with no Miatas entered.
Lanky Turtle is offline  
__________________
RacefastsafecaR
Quote