Quote:
Originally Posted by Bentley03
Fair enough, I obviously misunderstood this post of yours from a few days ago, which appears (to me) to be an attack on Mr Hedman.
And despite your denial, I'm still struggling to interpret it any other way.
|
Key words are 'in that case'. The poster implies Hedman does not want to pay for the sessions (even though we don't even know how expensive they are or who even pays for them) and if that's true I question that decision.