in fairness, i dont know much about how CVC structured their investment in F1 for those who had bought into/invested in CVC's portfolio so no arguments from me on that.
my point was more about (and poorly explained) not knowing much about CVC's investors (other then what one would assume is a motive to see the best return on their investment) is no different to the approach (again i assume) that shareholders in Liberty have.
i guess when it comes down to it, while Liberty may be talking a great game, the cynical side of me just sees them as another investment vehicle that thinks F1 is being under monetized.
suffice it to say, this is not a thought that fills me with hope for the types of changes i would like to see happen. (which actually makes my point completely off topic for this thread...sorry)