Thread: IMSA DPi Discussion
View Single Post
Old 24 Dec 2018, 10:32 (Ref:3872218)   #3356
Maelochs
Veteran
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
Maelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Quote:
Originally Posted by broadrun96 View Post
As opposed to Acura? Do you really think Acura or HPD did that and Oreca wasn't involved at all? We get it, you and a few others don't like the DPi idea but stop pretending somehow this was at ALL going to be anything other than marketing. Racing has ALWAYS been marketing and never about the best version of the actual street product.
Mazda was heavily involved with the design (well, styling) of its DPi .... And as I recall Cadillac (or some branch of GM) collaborated on their car.

Who cares, though?

And yes ... the DPi, the Gen 4 DP, and WEC's new hypercar are All about marketing. All, entirely. "Styling cues" are all about being able to pretend the racing car is in some way related to the street car. With the hypercar, aero is Deliberately sacrificed in favor of style ... as it was with the Gen 4 "Corvette" DP.

The DPi trend stated back in the fading days of the Rolex Sports Car Series, when manufacturers wanted the engine name listed ahead of the chassis name ... BMW wanted the winning car to be a BMW-Riley, not a Riley-BMW as the Euros had always done it. Ford wanted a Ford-Riley, not a Riley-Ford, to be in the news.

Now the DPis have bodywork and an engine from a dues-paying manufacturer, and no one mentions who made the base LMP2 chassis ... which was the workaround the merged series used in order to get the manufacturer's name in the news with every mention.

Not many people commented on the death of that tradition ... the chassis-maker getting first (or any) billing.

Again ... who cares how much Nissan added to the bodywork? As far as I know, None of the DPi chassis are so radically modified that they could escape intellectual-property lawsuits .... if the factories hadn't purchased naming rights.

The "Cadillac" is still just a Dallara-Cadillac ... the Nissan is still an Oreca-Nissan .... the chassis have not been changed beyond a few new engine- and accessory-mounting points.

Since it is all marketing ... we pretend Cadillac actually built a race car .... Nissan is just more up-front about it.
Maelochs is offline  
Quote