View Single Post
Old 10 Nov 2018, 05:10 (Ref:3862099)   #10
V8 Fireworks
Veteran
 
V8 Fireworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,938
V8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
We are still waiting on this class (now called S5000) to release it's calendar and final-issue chassis, which now takes the form of a halo-equipped 2018 Ligier JS Formula 3 tub fitted with the Coyote V8, local Hollinger gearbox and larger tyres and wings. https://www.motorsport.com/au/genera...00-car/374261/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ospi View Post
flatplane but you introduce issues which require money to rectify with that setup, plus you lose the meaty sound they are after.
Interestingly, you seem to get some of the throaty sound back by fitting a X-pipe to a flatplane V8. For instance, this Ferrari: https://youtu.be/tap6r-SH9tw?t=353

So it wouldn't be out of the question for the class to switch to a lightweight 116kg Judd racing V8 (instead of the 195kg Coyote production car engine) and get the "thunder" back by a combination of X-pipe and/or unequal length headers (such as what the Shelby GT350 uses, and why it rumbles somewhat even though it has a flatplane V8).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Armco Bender View Post
Could be a let down if thier just another class of car going around with little point of difference from the other current formula's.
It has a point of difference: the production-based V8 engine, that is both durable and relatively affordable! Quite a contrast to the 1.6L and 2.0L with or without turbo engines used in other affordable open-wheel classes.

The compromise, of course, is that the engine is very heavy compared to a V8 engine designed specifically for racing (like the Mechachrome GP2 engine, or Honda or Toyota IRL & Formula Nippon engines etc).

Last edited by V8 Fireworks; 10 Nov 2018 at 05:20.
V8 Fireworks is offline  
Quote