Quote:
Originally Posted by Mixer
Honestly given Supercars organisation non-involvement, this is a non-story.
Certain people who are suppliers to Supercars are trying to protect their interests but Chris Lambden is way off base with his vitriol.
Plus also... How can you get so upset of a "copycat" of something that is a "copycat" of an old Formula...
|
What a load of rubbish. Supercars own the design, how is that non-involvement?
Your comment about Lambden's idea being just a "copycat" of an old formula is ridiculous. That is like saying V8Supercars is just a copycat of the original years of Group C. It's a modern rule-set using principles that proved successful in the past....just like the basis for V8Supercars
Supercars have a history of spraying vitriol of things they consider to be "copycat" formula's anyway, remember Junior Touring? Or is that OK because it's Supercars and they can do anything they want?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by peebee2
It's not fair you've copied my copy! Lol
|
Please explain?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by GTRMagic
The more logical question right now is how CAMS allowed 2 almost identical open wheeler categories to develop in parallel..
|
CAMS has proven itself to be pretty spineless especially over the last few years.