View Single Post
Old 17 May 2013, 02:25 (Ref:3248671)   #86
Nicholosophy
Veteran
 
Nicholosophy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Australia
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,120
Nicholosophy should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridNicholosophy should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridNicholosophy should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
TL;DR

Schumacher (presumably Michael, not Ralf) was a great driver. So was Senna, Hakkinen, Prost, Lauda, and many more before them. Even today there are a group of drivers who are a different class of driver than the rest of the field. I'd put Vettel, Raikonen, Alonso, and Hamilton in that group but time will tell whether they stay there or are joined by Rosberg, Perez, etc.

To pick one driver as THE BEST seems redundant. F1 of the 1950s is completely different to F1 of today. Could Fangio have done what he did if there were 20 races? Or if he had to deal with modern aerodynamics? We'll never know of course.

To have an opinion that Driver A is better than Driver B is one thing. To swear black and blue that Driver A was the best and everyone else is wrong just doesn't make sense. It can only be a subjective arguement.
Nicholosophy is offline  
Quote