View Single Post
Old 28 Jun 2018, 15:43 (Ref:3833469)   #143
Racer65
Registered User
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 175
Racer65 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by crmalcolm View Post
I hope, (and sure that it will be the case) that they have opted to go down a different route with their application of the ballast/height calculation? The Ballast/Height calculation is a TOCA-imposed measure so I can't see how BMR can bring in updates to that?

Describing the centre of gravity height as a 'penalty' is probably not the best option though?
There was a post a few pages back about them raising the car height up. I suspect the CoG "penalty" is a combination of ridge height and weight so if they increase one they can decrease the other and still be within the rules.
Racer65 is offline  
Quote