[Nononsensecapeesh]

Originally Posted by Adam43

Yes, you can argue there must be a worst champion. However, it is as impossible to identify as the best. Perhaps it isn’t possible as the competition varies and the actual requirements and situations and context vary over the years too.

One other reason why this is a daft topic is that is based on the negative rather than the positive. Arguing who is the best focuses on the virtues. This concentrates on the negatives. Which, I believe shows more about the poster than the topic of discussion. Having said that this was, I think, started to debunk the theory and list positives. Many best driver discussions focus on why someone isn’t the best by pointing out their failing. Perhaps rarely do people want to say why things are good.

Well that has thoroughly depresssed me with the state of the human condition.

Why should there even have to be a worst F1 Champ?