|
The people implementing the rulebook did say he was penalised "due to consistency", which is a really weird statement. Is he not penalised because he did dangerously? Just being penalised because others were? And why are other drivers not happy with this? Is it a good rule badly written?
Once again, the FIA and stewards don't help the situation with how they worded it. Shouldn't have introduced that doubt with the consistency statement. If he's broken a rule then just say that - don't be all like "well, others got a penalty..so I guess he should!"
|