View Single Post
Old 27 Feb 2022, 20:21 (Ref:4100551)   #8060
Adam43
14th
1% Club
 
Adam43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
European Union
New Orleans
Posts: 42,630
Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!Adam43 is the undisputed Champion of the World!
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilipR View Post
Majority of the manufacturers are going to LMDH which has a separate rule set to the ACO.
yes.
Quote:
I was mainly referring to ACO LMH regs where maybe allowing the cars to race before being homologated for 5 years would allow the manufactures to see what works and what doesn't before they homologate the car.
Point still remains. If it was more expensive you would have had Toyota at best.

Or get some briefly before coats run away.

It was a necessity evil.
Quote:
Peugeot might not have been ready for Le mans still, but having the possibility to race before homologating the car might persuade them to enter the race with at least one car just for testing purposes. Maybe this would have helped with low grids before everybody is ready in 2023.
Yes they might and it is a disadvantage. I wasn’t disagreeing it is a potential disadvantage. Or that it wasn’t potentially effecting the current grid size, but to judge it and understand why you have to consider the whole.
Quote:
In the end it is what it is, once 2023 comes around and all the manufacturers are ready to compete we would have all forgotten about this issue and enjoy the new era of endurance racing.
spot on.
Adam43 is offline  
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously.
Quote