View Single Post
Old 24 Apr 2011, 21:35 (Ref:2869279)   #2506
cmk
Veteran
 
cmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Canada
Linköping, Sweden
Posts: 3,793
cmk should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridcmk should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridcmk should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Thanks for the insight knighty. This board is awesome, you page someone and they show up!

Would an issue with flexing be less likely to show up on the dyno compared to the cylinder lining issue, since the flexing should at least in part be a product of the actual mounting in the chassis? I'm trying to figure out why the engine, which should have been the bit they got on top of first, is causing so much struggle. I would have thought that the liner issue would have shown up on the dyno ages ago.

The other thing that gets me is that if they knew they had this issue and planned upgrades, why did they bring 2 cars to test day knowing they had a fatal flaw? I would have thought time and money would be best spent at home.

I agree with gwyllion that without a functional engine we and probably they have no idea what sort of mechanical or aerodynamic potential the car holds.
cmk is offline  
Quote