View Single Post
Old 28 Mar 2018, 12:35 (Ref:3811496)   #41
V8 Fireworks
Veteran
 
V8 Fireworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,941
V8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridV8 Fireworks should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tourer View Post
Large(ish) engined, RWD cars have been the exciting end of sedan racing here going back to the mid/late 60s really.
[I hope you recognised the Subaru and BMW BTCC cars are RWD. ]

Yes, and I'm saying race largish powerful rear wheel drive sedans that actually exist:

Merdeces C63 AMG
BMW M3
Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifologio
Kia Stinger GT
Lexus GS F
etc

Why race Holden Vectra, Nissan Maxima and Ford Mondeo sports sedans... it's an irrelevance!?

It doesn't have to be limited to 4-cylinders like the BTCC is: Go ahead and make having at least 6 cylinders mandatory (up the power from the BTCC's 350hp* to say 600hp) and remove the front wheel drive option (that the BTCC has)... The BTCC is just an example of how you can get so many manufacturers involved.

Quote:
Originally Posted by one five five View Post
And because these cars can be built from production shells, they don't need "manufacturer approval" to race one, hence the huge array of different brands in the series, officially backed or not
Yes, that's the key!

Parity is still obtained via the control front and rear subframes, and the aero is equalised too.

* PS. they might be buzz boxes but they are only 50hp less than the 400hp that the V8s were making in Group A in the 1980's. They are really not that slow IMO, but by all means make the ATCC version more powerful.

Last edited by V8 Fireworks; 28 Mar 2018 at 12:42.
V8 Fireworks is offline  
Quote