View Single Post
Old 24 Jun 2019, 11:15 (Ref:3913903)   #23
SWCRacing
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 205
SWCRacing has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
It was not bowing to pressure from "bad drivers" that got the national regulations for track limits changed, it was bowing to pressure from one particular, medically qualified, circuit owner and operator.

I have never seen the limits of the track listed on any National or International Track Licence. Any organiser that changes the Blue Book (for National) or ISC (for International) definition of track limits is making a mistake.

An organiser can decide which particular corners will be monitored by Judges of Fact for track limits infringements, usually the ones where and advantage will be gained. There are simply not enough personnel, or hours in the day to monitor every corner of a circuit

There are one set of regulations for track limits for National competitions run under MUK permits, and they have not changed since 2014

There are one set of regulations for track limits for International competitions run under the ISC. They haven't changed for donkey's years.

The photographs used at MSV briefings are the ones that were issued by the MSA (as then) to give pictorial guidance and explanation to the new regulations when they changed in 2014

It is down to the organising clubs to enforce the correct track limits regulations dependant on what level of event they are running. Having heard first hand certain organisers saying "we don't enforce track limits because they are rubbish", I know where the problem lies. It is also incumbent on the MUK Steward to report back to Colnbrook if the regulations aren't being properly enforced. This is where consistency would come from
SWCRacing is offline  
Quote