View Single Post
Old 3 May 2010, 08:17 (Ref:2683635)   #14
Pingguest
Veteran
 
Pingguest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Netherlands
Heemstede, The Netherlands
Posts: 3,192
Pingguest should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Purist View Post
The drivers hated the Group C, fuel conservation racing, and modern fans will NOT like the show that it produces, so that's just a no-go way of doing things.

Just to humor you, that would be a maximum of 230 litres (~60 gallons) of fuel for 1000km, if you went right at 50% of the final Group C allotment. Privateers can't afford to do the R&D to drop consumption b6 60%, and the top privateers will NOT settle for racing in the second class. For them, it's race for the overall, or they'll go somewhere else, period.
Energy-flow limits would be a perfect alternative. As the rate of fuel-flow is restricted fuel-efficiency will be the key for success, but drivers could still push the car to its limits. Engines and energy recovery systems could be left entirely free and unregulated.
Pingguest is offline  
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari
Quote