3 May 2010, 08:17 (Ref:2683635)
|
#14
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
|
Heemstede, The Netherlands |
Posts: 3,192
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Purist
The drivers hated the Group C, fuel conservation racing, and modern fans will NOT like the show that it produces, so that's just a no-go way of doing things.
Just to humor you, that would be a maximum of 230 litres (~60 gallons) of fuel for 1000km, if you went right at 50% of the final Group C allotment. Privateers can't afford to do the R&D to drop consumption b6 60%, and the top privateers will NOT settle for racing in the second class. For them, it's race for the overall, or they'll go somewhere else, period.
|
Energy-flow limits would be a perfect alternative. As the rate of fuel-flow is restricted fuel-efficiency will be the key for success, but drivers could still push the car to its limits. Engines and energy recovery systems could be left entirely free and unregulated.
|
|
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari
|