View Single Post
Old 24 Jun 2017, 05:40 (Ref:3746361)   #4938
TF110
Veteran
 
TF110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
United States
Posts: 15,409
TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scorchess View Post
They do not. The goal is to reduce costs while at the same time encouraging innovation. That's not a contradiction.
They do conflict themselves. The goal to reduce costs is not going to happen when you have to invest in new technology rather than keep the current technology. The current teams will have to make a new type of battery and hybrid system because they are not currently designed for 'plug-in'. Neither are they designed for doing race speeds on electric (battery) power alone. Then you have new chassis rules, on top of reduced time in the windtunnel which will lead teams to using CFD which is not as accurate and probably more expensive since they will have to use it more for computer to track correlation. Then you reduce on track testing which is much cheaper than trying to do CFD work. How is that reducing costs? This is the same mistake f1 has made.
TF110 is offline  
Quote