|
Indeed it is a difficult subject, not for the faint-headed. That's why I seldom attempt it. But if it is to be done it's worthless unless it's done fairly and objectively.
Your psychological dissection may have literary value, but I think it tells me more about you than it does about Michael.
If you want to see it done properly see Dino IV's posts in "The wrong champion" thread. He's a strong Senna appreciator but he's objective enough to give what I think might be a useful explanation of Senna's psychology.
Until you can be fair to Schumacher your postings about him have faint explanatory value, IMO.
|