View Single Post
Old 9 Sep 2016, 21:46 (Ref:3671317)   #11
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiana View Post
So ACO should be willing to accommodate LMP2-"DPi"s into LMP1 Nonhybrid, yet IMSA wouldn't have to give LMP1 Nonhybrids opportunity to race within their own LMP2-"DPi"... yeah sounds totally fair tradeoff
No trade off! IMSA does not have a P-1 class, it's top 'P' class is aligned with P-2.
The ACO are struggling to provide incentive enough for privateers to subscribe to P-1l (mainly cost), as the new P-2 are compliant to their new regs it would behoove the ACO IMO to adopt the DPi formula concept to populate their P-1l class. I do not believe it needs be an exact duplication of IMSA's, but, it would better suit the ACO's customers if it were to be compatible with it. Either an uptick for the IMSA DPis to compete at Le Mans or a slight de-tune for P-1l to race in IMSA rounds. Fairly simple and certainly doable if the ACO wish to, but we all know how that goes....

And yes, we ALL know you loathe the idea.








L.P.
HORNDAWG is offline  
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent
Quote