Quote:
Originally Posted by Tourer
Whilst in an ideal world you'd be right, when it comes to driving standards, various decisions / approaches / restrictions are discussed at driver briefings and changes are made on a rolling basis.
If for example, the driver group has an issue with a driver changing lines in the braking zone and not being penalised and the much greater risk overall if all of them start doing it, restrictions and allowances are changed to prevent a problem.
Or if the consensus in the briefing room and through the sport is that a particular incident was not handled well and is over-regulation then the FIA might agree to loosen the shackles somewhat for future races.
In most cases, the changes are relatively subtle and shouldn't wait for an entire season to be run to be rectified, sometimes from a sporting point of view, sometimes from a risk management point of view.
If a decision is a "bad" one, it makes no sense to keep making the same bad decision in the same circumstances purely for the sake of consistency.
|
Good points.
They really need permanent stewards, a record of decisions and agreed changes to ensure a transparent process.
I would bet my bottom dollar that Vettel would not have been granted a free pass if he exhibited the behavior Charles did at Monza.
The decision not to penalize Vettel in qualifying was pretty awkward given
Appendix L 2.c) above!