|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
30 Dec 2008, 22:32 (Ref:2363006) | #1 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 33
|
Touring Car Downforce
I have been involved in an ongoing debate at work about the amount of downforce a touring car (particularly SEAT) can generate. There is also confusion about the difference between the ETCC SEAT and the SEAT Leon Super Cup.
Someone threw out a figure of 200kg @ 150mph, but that seems ridiculously high. I was under the impression that the touring cars were limited. I also find it hard to believe the Supercup car would produce these figures; even though it has a very nice underbody and diffuser, the high wing would not really aid in the diffuser's ability to produce a significant amount of DF. Does anyone have any real world figures to help out here? Thank you |
||
|
30 Dec 2008, 23:17 (Ref:2363038) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,293
|
With regard to actual figures I do not know. However all road cars produce downforce at high speeds, modern car design and the general profile of the bonnet and windscreen generate downforce on all road cars, how much I do not know, a few KG?
|
||
|
31 Dec 2008, 00:10 (Ref:2363057) | #3 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 33
|
Actually, most road cars produce lift, and high speeds only exacerbates it. Look for SportAuto Super Test scans online and you will find that even the best cars produce lift. You will also find that manufacturer claims (i.e. Ferrari) are crazy exaggerated.
I stated that this is a "debate at work", but we are actually trying to use our bull-shyte-o'meters to sort through manufacturer claims for a project I am working on. If you have information, it will benefit many... |
||
|
31 Dec 2008, 00:42 (Ref:2363067) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,545
|
Quote:
|
||
|
31 Dec 2008, 10:28 (Ref:2363206) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,293
|
That certainly is news to me if true.
Cars produce lift? |
||
|
31 Dec 2008, 10:45 (Ref:2363214) | #6 | ||
Subscriber
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,615
|
Indeed they do.
|
||
|
31 Dec 2008, 10:54 (Ref:2363226) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 7,335
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
31 Dec 2008, 12:42 (Ref:2363287) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 311
|
so did the miura
|
||
__________________
"When your having one you only have time to scream in your helmet **** i'm having a shunt" James Hunt 1947-1993 |
31 Dec 2008, 12:52 (Ref:2363292) | #9 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,321
|
Audi claim their DTM car can do the "drive on the ceiling" thing as it can generate enough downforce to do so (at about 150mph I think was the figure given). But I guess DTM cars produce way more downforce than an S2000 car.
|
||
|
31 Dec 2008, 16:46 (Ref:2363381) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
Former F1 driver Kiesa commented after racing Audi R11, that it had F1 like downforcelevels.
|
||
__________________
Le Mans Christian Bakkerud, Team Kolles Formula Renault 2.0 NEC Mikkel Mac DTC Martin Marrill, M-Sport |
31 Dec 2008, 22:09 (Ref:2363499) | #11 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 33
|
Anyone else have data on the S2000 Touring Cars?
|
||
|
2 Jan 2009, 09:13 (Ref:2363931) | #12 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 21
|
I think your figure is ok.
If you know software LapSim from Bosch,there is front drive touring car example with some aero specification and if I remember in this simulation software downforce level is just over 100kg@200kph so around 150kg@150mph. |
|
|
4 Jan 2009, 16:57 (Ref:2365090) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 8,298
|
I would imagine that the downforce applied to a saloon is not specifically designed to glue the whole car down, more an "end"
The issue always was getting heat into rear tyres, front grip was often combatted by serious diff tech, I remember reading a test of the Primera Aiello car and Hales was amazed by the diff tech involved. Rear grip was probably helped by spoilers and not sure now if this is still an issue, I would guess so. I know that the Alfa was a very slippery shape, and the SEAT a good car to draft!! |
||
|
6 Jan 2009, 08:26 (Ref:2366124) | #14 | |
Racer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 195
|
I am sure the front-wing of an F1 car is what creates the air-flow underneath the car which, at such high speeds creates enough pressure (??) to stick the car to the road. So, if is it local to assume, and without doing the research, the front splitter on a touring car does the same job?
Last edited by SEATFreak; 6 Jan 2009 at 08:29. |
|
|
6 Jan 2009, 17:43 (Ref:2366487) | #15 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 33
|
Thanks Rob21. I have heard of the Bosch program before, but for some reason never found it. I am installing as I write this.
Do you have much experience with this program? Do you think the data is pretty legit, or is it just a place holder? Does anyone else have some input on this? Thanks again |
||
|
7 Jan 2009, 09:43 (Ref:2366883) | #16 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 21
|
Quote:
|
||
|
7 Jan 2009, 19:51 (Ref:2367242) | #17 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 679
|
Quote:
for an aeroplane to fly, the wing has to generate "positive" lift (lift in an upwards direction), so the upper surface of the wing is longer than the lower surface... as the air-flow tries to remain laminar (imagine parallel lines of air molecules), the air molecules must move faster over the top surface than they do over the bottom surface... this generates a low pressure area above the wing (same amount of air, but spread thinner, if you like) and the wing moves upwards, pushes by the high pressure towards the low pressure... this much has been known (and then understood) by aviation types since the early 1900s now, some bright sparks decided this could be applied to cars - but in reverse... turn a wing profile upside-down, to generate "negative" lift (or 'down-force', as it became known, to help simple folks distinguish between lift [up] and lift [down]) and instead of taking off, a car would be pushed down into the road surface, helping the tyres grip at crucial junctures... like in fast corners and under braking... in essence, a single-seater (and here we must also include the likes of Le Mans prototypes, among others) aims to create the low-pressure area UNDER the wing (and here we include front and rear wings and the whole body surface) instead of on top of it... the wings and all those other god-awful aero add-ons on an F1 car are largely needed to direct air-flow where it's needed, to avoid creating drag (the enemy of speed) while still generating significant downforce... wings are also used to alter the balance of the car, by adding or losing downforce at one end or the other Colin Chapman's major step-forward with 'Ground-Effect' wing cars essentially featured an enclosed tunnel alongside the tub with upturned wing profile inside to literally create a low-downforce area, as the underside of the side-pod was longer than the flat top surface... this only worked if the 'tunnel' was sealed effectively, stopping normal-pressure air rushing into the low-pressure-area (nature abhors a vacuum!) hence the sliding skirts to seal the car to the road... when skirts stuck (or cars jumped kerbs) and air leaked IN, cars flew off the road alarmingly, as they were only successfully cornering so fast because of the aerodynamic effect and when that was lost, the car was simply committed at a far higher speed than the tyres would cope with... ouch! To return (briefly) to topic, touring car airdams usually serve to tidy up the airflow, ensure under-car airflow is within tolerances (ie no actual lift - as mentioned, this was a major flaw in the early 917s and the Muira - among many others) by using a splitter to channel as much as possible OVER the car, and as the route over the upper surface of the car is longer than the route straight underneath it, generate the desired low-pressure area underneath of course, when you have 300bhp and not 900, you have to be very careful as regards creating drag, so too much downforce is not a good thing the n-technology Alfas were mentioned and Thommo confirmed their major advantage was their ultra-low-drag configuration... in fact, when he won both races at Valencia in 2007 with the car, he trimmed the rear wing off so much that he was developing positive lift on the straights... it makes the car 'lighter' as it's partly 'flying', helping the engine move it faster down the straights... plus, it picks up a 'tow' better and gives a worse tow to those behind... anyhow, this doesn't help with real numbers... but if I remember I will email someone and try to get a 'soft' ball-park number... |
|||
__________________
If it doesn't make your ears bleed, it's not a proper sport! |
7 Jan 2009, 21:08 (Ref:2367290) | #18 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 33
|
Hey Martin, I just looked you up and am sure that you have some solid connections within the European racing circles. If you could come up with some real numbers that would be great. This is actually for work and not just some "watering hole" debate.
As an aside, I have just bookmarked your Dakar blog. We do not get coverage in the U.S. and have been passing around recorded videos of daily coverage. Between the videos and your blog, we should be covered. Thank you |
||
|
7 Jan 2009, 22:28 (Ref:2367336) | #19 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 69
|
for Dakar coverage, also see www.sbs.com.au/dakar it has daily videos etc.
|
||
|
7 Jan 2009, 22:30 (Ref:2367341) | #20 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 679
|
Quote:
Will try and get some numbers - naturally, no-one wants to reveal actual numbers to any degree of accuracy but I will see what I can get |
|||
__________________
If it doesn't make your ears bleed, it's not a proper sport! |
7 Jan 2009, 22:37 (Ref:2367350) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,545
|
Quote:
What happened, you slept with the boss' wife? |
||
|
7 Jan 2009, 23:03 (Ref:2367364) | #22 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 33
|
Yeah, I realized the 2007 date just after I posted.
I understand playing it close to their chest, as unfortunately I have to do the same, but if you could get someone to confirm the 150 - 200kg @ 150mph and give 'approximate' percentages up or down from there that would help a lot. Go ahead and email this to me if tit would be easier to convince someone to share some info. |
||
|
21 Jan 2009, 13:29 (Ref:2376091) | #23 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 18
|
Quote:
They were re-called in before fitting them on production. |
||
|
1 Mar 2009, 08:15 (Ref:2406436) | #24 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 1
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Expected amounts of downforce on a formula car | Mcp138 | Racing Technology | 5 | 7 Apr 2008 18:48 |
Worst Paint job on a Touring car/V8 Super Car ? | Road Ranger Vk | Australasian Touring Cars. | 164 | 6 Apr 2008 12:05 |
Downforce Coefficient of F1 car | teamno1 | Racing Technology | 2 | 4 Sep 2002 21:19 |
How much downforce (KG's) does an F1 car produce? | Sodemo | Formula One | 4 | 27 Jun 2001 20:19 |
Best looking Touring Car? | Sodemo | Touring Car Racing | 23 | 8 Jan 2001 01:31 |