|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
View Poll Results: Should V8SC follow F1 pointscore? | |||
Yes | 5 | 16.13% | |
No | 26 | 83.87% | |
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
19 Mar 2009, 05:04 (Ref:2418913) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,382
|
Should V8SC follow F1 pointscore?
I see that this years F1 champion will be based on his number of wins, regardless of his pointscore. Is this a good idea for V8SC?
|
||
|
19 Mar 2009, 05:25 (Ref:2418917) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,267
|
No, they should follow MotoGP scoring.
|
||
__________________
I'm not saying "let's go and kill all the stupid people"... I'm just saying "let's remove all of the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out". |
19 Mar 2009, 05:31 (Ref:2418920) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 436
|
It's not a good idea for F1, never mind anybody else....
|
|
__________________
david5: Just because something is popular, doesn't mean it's right, look at blowflies eating horse **** for instance. |
19 Mar 2009, 07:47 (Ref:2418969) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 150
|
Absolutely they should. The guy who wins the most races ,not the guy who circulates for points is the champion. This would make having a dive at the last corner worth the effort and might even wake up the racing.
|
||
__________________
Dyslexia rules KO |
19 Mar 2009, 07:52 (Ref:2418976) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
The F1 points system is abit mix n match, which doesn't really work.
However surely anything is an improvement on the current 'points for everyone' setup |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
19 Mar 2009, 08:56 (Ref:2419039) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,014
|
It's worse for V8s (or ATCC) as the series is not geared so much towards the most common race winner, with multiple races per round and the like.
|
|
|
19 Mar 2009, 09:16 (Ref:2419064) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 533
|
They should do a chase like nascar.
|
|
__________________
My Favourite 08 moment was when Courtney/Besnard comeback drive at Bathurst. Courtney raced through to dominate the opening stint had 15 sec. gap to Lowndes who was in 2nd. In the 2nd stint a slowly deflating tyre (originally diagnosed as a damaged anti-roll bar) slowed Besnard's stint in Courtney's car allowing Whincup to assert dominance over the field rest of the race. On lap 160 S.Richards, fading badly on rear tyres was unable to stop Courtney move into 3rd place. |
19 Mar 2009, 09:19 (Ref:2419065) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
VESA do have a tendency to follow what other categories instigate.
I think the proposed F1 point system is flawed for F1 but would work in a series such as the 5 litre championship |
||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
19 Mar 2009, 09:38 (Ref:2419088) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 8,782
|
no.
|
||
|
19 Mar 2009, 13:21 (Ref:2419278) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
And have people only need to perform in the last part of the year?
Or have a farce like last year where Kyle Busch dominates the first 26 races, then loses his points lead, has a bad run and is out of contention after a couple of Chase races..... A contrived Chase would almost finish it off for me honestly.... |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
20 Mar 2009, 01:55 (Ref:2419899) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,014
|
The difference in value from a 4th place to a race win is alot less in 5 litre touring cars than F1 in my opinion as the spread of top teams is broader, hence a winners-based system wouldn't really work here I think.
At Winton at least for example, sure at Bathurst 1st place is much better result than 4th, but at Winton it might just be the result of a dodgy pit stop, poor start from pole and not much different pace to the winner. |
|
|
20 Mar 2009, 02:10 (Ref:2419902) | #12 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,991
|
No way. The new F1 points system is dumb. It would have been simpler to increase the points awarded to winners.
Perhaps V8SC should increase the gaps between the points positions. Anyway, V8SC need to get rid of that new qualifying rule first. |
|
__________________
Cromley: "With the margin Gareth has, he doesn't need to play for sheep stations" |
20 Mar 2009, 02:17 (Ref:2419903) | #13 | |
Official Timekeeper!
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,420
|
No, but the points should be weighted in such a way that a win is worth pushing for. The 2008 F1 points system was 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1. For 2009, FOTA proposed a 12-9-7-5-4-3-2-1 (which the FIA turned down in favour of the "gold medal" rule) but you get the idea - instead of being content with second place, structure the points in such a way that means the drivers will always fight for a win.
|
|
__________________
I wasn't speeding, officer. I was qualifying. |
20 Mar 2009, 03:51 (Ref:2419923) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,267
|
Exactly my point regarding motogp. There is enough incentive to win and be up the top. And it always seems to determine the right champion too, because it combines consistency and race wins.
|
||
__________________
I'm not saying "let's go and kill all the stupid people"... I'm just saying "let's remove all of the warning labels and let the problem sort itself out". |
20 Mar 2009, 08:03 (Ref:2419993) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
|||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
20 Mar 2009, 08:42 (Ref:2420025) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,394
|
Quote:
"Insert name here racing had a great weekend with a 19th in race 1, working our way up to 13th in race 2. With 11,435 points for the round it has elevated us to 22nd in the championship." |
||
|
22 Mar 2009, 01:01 (Ref:2421674) | #17 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 307
|
What was wrong with the 'old' F1 system of 10-6-4-3-2-1 ??
|
||
__________________
It was long ago, and it was far away... but it was so much better than it is today! |
22 Mar 2009, 01:16 (Ref:2421695) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
Nothing wrong with it, rewarded the winner and the people doing the business
Only problem was the team owners who like to tell their sponsors they got 200 points for the weekend even though their best race finish was 25th |
||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
22 Mar 2009, 02:52 (Ref:2421771) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,508
|
The new F1 scoring system of most wins takes the title has been scrapped for this year. It was introduced contrary to the FIA's own regulations which state that changes to the regulations cannot be made after January 1 without unanimous approval from the teams.
See here |
||
__________________
Bigamy is having one wife too many. Monogamy is the same. {Oscar Wilde} |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flemington Racecourse: A potential future F1/V8SC track? | SSbaby | Australasian Touring Cars. | 31 | 8 Nov 2007 22:24 |
F1 style qualifying for V8SC??? | billy bigtime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 25 | 27 Jul 2006 08:16 |
Is V8SC going down F1 road? | Wingman | Australasian Touring Cars. | 36 | 28 Apr 2006 05:18 |
Why do you follow F1? Is it the drivers or the cars? | Sodemo | Formula One | 58 | 27 Mar 2003 03:10 |