|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 Apr 2009, 21:22 (Ref:2434607) | #1 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 62
|
Rubens is a perenial number 2...
I was thinking while watching Rubens trudge back to the pit during the last moments of the Malaysian GP, that he has always been a number 2. It confuses me because he IS a very fast driver and he has all the ability to win. He ran faster than the great Mike Shoemaker on many occasions yet it always seems that he gets the rough end of the stick. There were many times at Ferrari when he could and probably should have won if not for 'team orders'. Now at Brawn (and to a point at Honda although that was more of a test of character than anything else) he has been given a very good car yet he still seems to be playing second fiddle. Is it just 'not his time' right now and all will come good later in the season or is he really just a second rate driver?? Is it that Jenson really is on a par with Lewis or Massa or Raikkonen or Alonso, but hasn't had the equipment to show his potential - Now he has and it shows his hunger for wins with great racing that leaves Rubens in the shade?? I know Rubens can win and I want him to succeed but will he or is he just a perenial number 2?
|
||
__________________
Direct from the underbelly of Shamoo!! |
5 Apr 2009, 21:33 (Ref:2434617) | #2 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,018
|
Quote:
In Australia he was a little unlucky, raced a little scrappily, but also quite well at different points, and ultimately was a little lucky to get second. In Malaysia he had his penalty, but wasn't on Jenson's pace despite getting close on the first lap. Button is on a high, Rubens should be feeling great about his car and thinking he was very lucky to have such a car. I suspect that Button winning has (not in a nasty way and I'm sure he is happy for Jenson) just taken the edge of that. |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
5 Apr 2009, 21:52 (Ref:2434631) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Two intials points: Rubens has not always been a number two by any stretch of the imagination (ignore this if you were being figurative); believe it or not, Michael just simply beat Rubens the vast majority of the time because was actually really, really, really good at his job.
Also, sometimes Michael sat back. Hungary 2002 he cruised behind Rubens all the way, for instance, whilst neither of them pushed at all. Rubens was left alone to win Nurb because the whole world would've just exploded if they didn't. Monza '02 Michael mysteriously dropped pace for a coincidentally perfect number of laps, which just so happened to have Rubens come out just ahead of him. And so on. I'm citing 2002 because it was Austria that year which caused everyone to flip out to such an insane degree. I am not in anyway debating that Rubens was the number two and not the driver Ferrari had in mind for winning the championship, but I am saying that sometimes things went in his favour too. There were other times when Rubens was moved out of the way because he was miles behind in points and had been gubbed my Michael all year prior to that point. Sometimes it was just the logical decision that any team would've made. Now, as for 2009, I think it is that Jenson excels when he has a good car that really works for him. We are seeing his driving from 2004 happening in a better car. Whilst Rubens is a thoroughly decent driver, I just don't think he is as good as Jenson. I wouldn't put Button in the same tier as the Alonso's and Hamilton's of this world, but he is amply good enough to win a championship in a good car. Rubens, meanwhile, I wouldn't be sure about: he would, imo, need a dominant car and a team-mate not as good as he is. I imagine Rubens will have his days this year, but I doubt he'll give Jenson a huge challenge overall. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
5 Apr 2009, 23:49 (Ref:2434691) | #4 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,156
|
Quote:
That said, its too early in the season to say that Rubens will always be out-paced by Button, it will be intriguing to find out who comes up out on top! Both are great. Now we will see who is greater I guess. |
|||
__________________
Steve McQueen- "Racing is life. Anything before or after is just waiting." |
6 Apr 2009, 01:43 (Ref:2434752) | #5 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 17
|
I was going to say no, if you put any F1 driver in a good car (front running car) then they would demonstrate their skills but having thought about it I think there are a few that will never be that "number one" driver. Rubens is probably one of them, he is a good driver and probably a very nice bloke but that's maybe why he will always be seen as second fiddle.
I reckon Kimi will be the same unless they get rid of that fridge with the icecream and coke in it!! |
||
|
6 Apr 2009, 03:44 (Ref:2434781) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,702
|
I don't think Rubens is Number 2 at Brawn. In his history alongside Button at Honda, they have always been more or less on the same pace. He's just had a few dramas so far - if he'd got to the first turn first in Melbourne, we might not be having this discussion.
He'll find his stride... |
|
|
6 Apr 2009, 05:26 (Ref:2434802) | #7 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
He has been well behind Button when the car has been OK. I kind of expected him to do better this year all the same.
Although I see Brawn has brought over some of his old Ferrari gearboxes. He'll get wins but ultimately finish well behind Jenson. |
|
|
6 Apr 2009, 09:41 (Ref:2434918) | #8 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,901
|
He hasn't had the rub of the green yet this year has he?
The Ferrari days are well documented, well mostly, as his form whilst at Maranello was probably a combination of things really, 1/ a quicker teammate, 2/ his struggle largely to accept what Schumacher's contract entitled him to over him. In light of what didn't happen for him there maybe he now wishes he drove for someone else after Stewart instead? He has his days though and is still very much likely to have some of them this season. |
||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
6 Apr 2009, 10:08 (Ref:2434936) | #9 | |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 117
|
Does anyone think that maybe Senna would have been a better bet than Rubens?
I see why they went for experience but so far I don't think Rubens has been showing it especially with the accidents in Australia and what turned out to be a lucky 2nd place. I'm sure he'll get better and have some good results in that car but do you think we'll be seeing him next year? I just think its time for some fresh blood. Rubens is good no-one disputes that but I feel he's had his time its time for someone fresh. |
|
|
6 Apr 2009, 10:15 (Ref:2434940) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,361
|
Quote:
Not with the situation that Brawn were in before the season started - they needed an old hand who could get into the car with very little testing and drive it quickly, which Barrichello has by and large done. Senna may prove to be very capable in F1, but it would have been too much of a gamble this year. |
|||
__________________
"The more I see of the world, the more am I dissatisfied with it; every day confirms my belief of the inconsistency of all human characters, and of the little dependence which can be placed on the appearance of either merit or sense." -- Elizabeth Bennet, 'Pride & Prejudice' |
6 Apr 2009, 14:52 (Ref:2435202) | #11 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
Would Senna have been a better bet? I assume we are talking Bruno Senna? I'm inclined to say a big fat no to that. Not enough experience.
He could have done an OK job, but equally he could have done a Piquet (Jr, not dad). |
|
|
6 Apr 2009, 15:05 (Ref:2435215) | #12 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,901
|
I'd go along with Knowlesy on that one.
Whilst i'd like to see Bruno get a drive one day (hope it's not too late) dropping him in amongst the Brawn situation pre season would have been too much for him. The guy would have needed loads of mileage even in a top car. Ross suspected but couldn't know for sure how good the new car would be. Based on the situation Brawn were in and the rush to get ready in time Rubens was the best choice available to help knit things together with Jense and the rest of the team. |
||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
6 Apr 2009, 19:01 (Ref:2435417) | #13 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
Quote:
Michael's contract, just like Rubens', would have a bit about obeying team-orders. I fail to see why they would need anything different. It is how the team-orders are employed which determines whether a driver is a No.2 or not, not any unnecessarily constricting contract stuff. Think of the times when Michael has finished behind his Ferrari team-mates. Those scenarios would represent breach of contract if Michael had it contractually bound that he finishes ahead. Sure, it could be argued that it was just that Michael was OK with it and this is why it happened that way (therefore, wasn't an issue being breach of contract). In which case it highlights just exactly why there is no need for different contracts: put Michael and his team-mate on the same contract, then they just apply the orders and preferences in Michael's favour. Just to be clear, although I think it is, I am in no way at all disputing that Michael was blatantly Ferrari's No.1 driver. |
|||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
6 Apr 2009, 21:02 (Ref:2435474) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,493
|
||
|
6 Apr 2009, 21:51 (Ref:2435509) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,545
|
Quote:
Barichello is close too, if he will manage to up Button or not remains to be seen. But that remains to be seen as well. |
||
|
6 Apr 2009, 22:10 (Ref:2435522) | #16 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,114
|
What I wrote in the Jenson Button thread:
Rubens cut a lonely figure walking back to the pits post-race. I wouldn't be surprised if that's it now, and Button goes to greater heights whilst Barrichello only occasionally beats him (a bit like how Hakkinen was demonstrably the dominant one against Coulthard from Hakkinen's first win onwards). |
|
|
7 Apr 2009, 00:03 (Ref:2435569) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,387
|
Right now Rubens is only 5 points behind Button in the Championship. All it takes is for Jenson to have 1 bad race and he should be right back on top. Trouble is I can't see Button having a bad race in his current form!
Much as I like Rubens, I think this may well be the last season we see him in Formula 1. Which is good, in a way, because if he'd been out of a drive at the end of '08, we wouldn't have had a chance to give him a proper send-off. |
||
__________________
"A lot of people go through life doing things badly. Racing’s important to men who do it well. When you’re racing, it... it’s life. Anything that happens before or after... is just waiting." - Steve McQueen |
7 Apr 2009, 00:06 (Ref:2435573) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
7 Apr 2009, 00:21 (Ref:2435585) | #19 | |
Official Timekeeper!
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,420
|
Rubens will know that 2009 is probably going to be the last chance for him to leave his mark on Formula One, so I don't expect him to sit in Button's shadow this season. It's 15 points versus 10 at the moment, and there are still 150 points to be won...
|
|
__________________
I wasn't speeding, officer. I was qualifying. |
7 Apr 2009, 06:13 (Ref:2435662) | #20 | ||||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,573
|
Quote:
Quote:
Frankly I think Rubens left his mark at Donington 1993 (overshadowed by Senna's drive) but that was the last time he really shone. He's always been an also ran, even when Stewart won its race, it was Herbert, not Rubens, which should tell us something about grasping opportunities. In terms of his place in F1 I rate him behind Patrese, Alboreto, Berger and others of that ilk but ahead of Alesi, Irvine etc. Pretty much a second driver though. |
||||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
7 Apr 2009, 07:41 (Ref:2435698) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
7 Apr 2009, 07:46 (Ref:2435701) | #22 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,573
|
True.
|
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
9 Apr 2009, 22:31 (Ref:2437766) | #23 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 62
|
Here's the thing though, Rubens is an incredibly fast driver, so why isn't he at the top of the leader board?? If you watch Button he has an incredibly smooth style. F! rewards smooth drivers, so it stands to reason that Button will win races in a good car, but also the ragged edge style can be fruitful (see Montoya, Villenueve etc.) I think rubens has the potential still to win races and a championship but, despite what others think of his time at Ferrari he has been a definite number two all (with the exception of his stewart days) all his career. As for Mike Shoemaker not having a contractual 'arrangement' in place that stipulated his preferential treatment...erm I thought it was 'common knowledge'.
|
||
__________________
Direct from the underbelly of Shamoo!! |
10 Apr 2009, 06:57 (Ref:2437870) | #24 | ||
The Honourable Mallett
20KPINAL
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 37,573
|
Montoya was never going to win a WDC as long as his rear end points downwards. He was too ragged.
Rubens is not a ragged driver, but he doesn't get the best out of his equipment by a long way, which is the difference between him and Button who does. Last year was probably a good example of the opposite effect, where we saw that Rubens could drive around problems because he had nothing at stake, whilst Jenson got a bit stuck. Going back further we can look at the way Rubens struggled because of the set up of the car, which was eventually changed and he started moving forwards. I suspect that Jenson just shrugged his shoulders and got on with life but Rubens needed the changes in order to compete. JV was also a reasonably smooth driver, albeit he could in his prime drive the car on any part of the track, but ragged he wasn't. |
||
__________________
I've decided to stop reaching out to people. I'm just going to contact them instead. |
10 Apr 2009, 19:19 (Ref:2438256) | #25 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,901
|
Quote:
Rubens: Yes that's a good summary. With him his best is very very good but it only seems to occur once a year at best? JV: He could really chuck the car about when 'on a charge' but for the most part I wouldn't confuse his style of smooth with simply not being quick enough. |
|||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rubens to get Lucky Number 11 | Spritle | Formula One | 26 | 2 Dec 2005 17:48 |
What about Rubens | Wingman | Formula One | 28 | 1 Jul 2005 22:47 |
Rubens | Osella | Formula One | 33 | 23 Jul 2003 12:03 |
What has Rubens got to do? | Mr V | Formula One | 52 | 31 Jul 2002 04:14 |
Rubens???????????????? | Mr V | Formula One | 23 | 4 Jan 2002 16:24 |