|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
29 Oct 2016, 17:33 (Ref:3683872) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,482
|
The end of LMP1 as we know it?
I just listened to Midweek Motorsport about Audi's exit from WEC and top level sportscar racing. Suddenly it felt like this truly is the end of an era, and this is why.
I think this is where LMP1 start to fade away. Let's look at how ACO have promoted LMP3, and how popular it have become. It's a cost limited formula, while still being a prototype race car. Let's look at how ACO have decided to limit the multitude of machines and technological development that was happening in LMP2 in favour of a limited about of chassis options, and engine. Let's look at how LMP1 privateer teams have lobbies for some way to get some kind of reason for them to be on the grid together with the factories, and ACO's response have caused Rebellion to leave. If that's not a big vote of no-confidence I'm not sure what is. Let's look at the LMP2 teams that have expressed an interest in stepping up to LMP1. See above. Let's look at one of the most expensive cock ups in marketing and race program efforts ever, Nissan LMP1. Not only did they spend stupid amounts of money on advertising, they also according to some voices never even tested their car with the hybrid system functioning before going racing! That was probably the best way ever to make bean counters think a top level sports car effort would be wasted money. Add this up and I wonder why anyone would start a LMP1 program. I think the future is LMP2 (pro) and LMP3 (pro-am) together on track, as LMP1 fades away. What do you think? |
|
__________________
Drive faster and longer than the rest ...in anything but a Honda... |
29 Oct 2016, 20:03 (Ref:3683898) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,955
|
Quote:
I am glad to see the Audi withdraw myself. A shake up is what is needed I think to keep things from getting to boring. Half the fun with sportscar racing is the specutainment as the radiolemans.com folks like to call it. |
||
|
29 Oct 2016, 21:00 (Ref:3683902) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,563
|
It is unusual for manufacturers to compete in top level sportscars for more than 10 years at a time. If you look back over the last 50 or 60 years the only manufacturers that have done so are Porsche and Audi. All the others have come and gone in much shorter time frames.
It is up to those who make the rules to plan for that as it is usually in era's with major manufacturer battles that sportscar racing is best remembered. Ideally you need about 4 manufacturers competing, any less and you run the risk of not enough if one or two leave, any more and some will not be able to compete and will go anyway. The usual way the problems build up is that the cost of winning becomes too great and the bean counters come and say there is not enough return for what we are doing and the plug gets pulled. It is up to the rule makers to come up with a formula to prevent costs getting out of hand and also allow privateers compete with the manufacturers. As an aside it will be interesting to see how FE gets on as there will be at least 5 manufacturers in it soon. That could lead very quickly lead to an arms race to win at all costs. We will know the answer in 4 or 5 years time. |
|
|
29 Oct 2016, 22:48 (Ref:3683910) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,567
|
Did the same thing get promoted so much when it was just Audi and Peugeot or Audi and Toyota? The ACO's press release on Audi's departure seems to say more are on the way and have touted hydrogen like they have someone ready to use it.
|
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 02:30 (Ref:3683934) | #5 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 122
|
Who could replace Audi? No American manufacturer has the technical skills nor the members to challenge Porsche or Toyota. Honda won't bother, Nissan tried, and failed miserably, who knows if Renault would let them. Peugeot doesn't want to sink tons of money developing a hybrid system. BMW has squashed any hopes for 2018 LMP car.
Ferrari, maybe, or Mercedes are the only even somewhat realistic options. Bently wouldn't try as they're a VAG brand, honestly I don't know who could possibly replace Audi. |
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 06:57 (Ref:3683963) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 208
|
I believe Mercedes vowed never to return to Le Mans after both of their well publicised disasters.
I think LMP1 will eventually become a privateer dominated (by numbers) class. A major rule change will be required. As good as it has been, either hybrid systems need to go or have a decent and affordable off the shelf product for teams to use for LMP1 to be a viable option. |
||
|
30 Oct 2016, 08:24 (Ref:3683977) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
||
|
30 Oct 2016, 08:26 (Ref:3683978) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Although ACO might revamp the LMP1 class in order to accomodate privateers and semi-works team, my concern that they might limit some aspects of that class like the number of approved chassis manufacturers, spec parts, etc.
|
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 08:27 (Ref:3683979) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
I believe this is some kind of a made up myth, and some kind of a way to glorify the accidents. Boardrooms do not sound like places where superstition is regarded highly.
Last edited by deggis; 30 Oct 2016 at 08:33. |
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 08:35 (Ref:3683980) | #10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Depends how much the regulations are opened. Currently development is very limited and in future the chassis supposed to stay totally spec even if the battery side is gradually more opened.
|
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 08:47 (Ref:3683982) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,482
|
Interesting to hear all your ideas on this.
Personally I think the noises from ACO about hydrogen and suchlike it just that, trying to entice more than anything solid. At least I wont believe anything come that way until it's on the pit lane of Le Mans. I don't think it is immediate disaster. Manufacturers come and go, and while the era of Audi have been longer than I've been following endurance racing it was always something of an anomaly. I also don't think my projected future will happen soon, but if we see no privateers in LMP1 in 2018, quite likely I'd say. Then the cards are on the table. If we see no additional manufacturer in 2018, which right now looks like a possible future, then I see no future for LMP1. Keep talking, this is interesting! |
|
__________________
Drive faster and longer than the rest ...in anything but a Honda... |
30 Oct 2016, 12:09 (Ref:3684000) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,891
|
An interesting article from motorsport, but let us all hope the ACO have something in mind, i will be attending silverstone spa and le mans next year whatever but would like to see some good racing in the top class. Fingers crossed LMP1 can adapt and attract entries from either manufacturers or quality privateers
|
||
|
30 Oct 2016, 16:29 (Ref:3684040) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
|||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
30 Oct 2016, 16:53 (Ref:3684045) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,567
|
Hyundai, Honda (Acura), Peugeot, BMW and Subaru are the names we've heard about wanting to do lmp1. Any one of these guys joins for a 3 year program it's going to be a huge deal. I think the ACO has assurance that someone is coming in.
|
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 17:42 (Ref:3684059) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,891
|
|||
|
30 Oct 2016, 18:23 (Ref:3684071) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
Peugeot and BMW have already stated costs, and technological direction are too high or and wrong. Subaru can't afford a 250+ million dollar per year P1 project. Hyundai may, but would probably go GTE first, Honda is headed for GTE, not P1.
|
||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
30 Oct 2016, 18:43 (Ref:3684075) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Quote:
Even under less complex LMP1 rules, putting together such a programme takes years of preparation so for manufacturers to go from no to yes (like BMW and Peugeot) to even put a car on track will take a long time, and we`re not even there yet where anybody has made the decision. I think even under the most optimistic scenario, if someone would agree to join now, they won't be on the grid before sometime in 2018 the earliest, 2019 more likely. So even if things go really well and there are new manufacturers coming (which I don't see right now, to be honest..) Toyota and Porsche will have to take us through two more seasons at least. If not longer. |
||
|
30 Oct 2016, 19:09 (Ref:3684077) | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
The 919 was running a year after it was announced.
Toyota was racing within 8 months and won a race 11 months after it was announced. 2018 is both completely viable and already when any new manufacturers were expected to debut because of the regulation changes. |
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 19:18 (Ref:3684079) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,482
|
I really don't have any information anyone else here is lacking about the future, but I know one thing about the past. The 919 Porsche was in development *way* before it was announced, that much Porsche have divulged.
|
|
__________________
Drive faster and longer than the rest ...in anything but a Honda... |
30 Oct 2016, 19:44 (Ref:3684082) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
Sure, but the point is just because no one has announced doesn't mean no one has started preparing. Contrary to all the doom and gloom I feel like Peugeot is now more likely to return in 2018, because the organizers are now going to be much more desperate to bring them in. Peugeot has done LMP1 and in house factory run motorsport programs much more recently than Porsche had, so it should be much easier for them to come back.
Despite what Toyota is currently spending it seems like Toyota and Peugeot both have about the same kind of budget they want to in the long term, it's pretty clear what the ACO and FIA need to do. I know the Peugeot Sport director was talking about non-hybrid cars a few days ago but Audi Sport was also a huge proponent of the GRE and has still never raced one. |
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 20:56 (Ref:3684097) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,470
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
“We’re trying to close the doors without embarrassing ourselves, the France family and embarrassing (the) Grand American Series,” he said in the deposition. “There is no money. There is no purse. There’s nothing.” |
30 Oct 2016, 21:14 (Ref:3684102) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
It was?
Announcement June 2011: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/92733 First photos were these exactly 2 years later: http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...mans-prototype Is there a more accurate timeline? And there's a big difference between "running" as in doing the very first tests in private and being actually race-ready. |
|
|
30 Oct 2016, 22:42 (Ref:3684121) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,308
|
For some reason the source I had said June 2012 but it actually links to something from June 2011. One of those links alludes to something I was already saying though
Quote:
For a Hyundai or a Subaru 2018 would probably be impossible, for a company that has existing resources capable of handling a sports prototype project it could be done. |
||
|
31 Oct 2016, 05:20 (Ref:3684190) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,567
|
With Audi's departure there may some staff that want to join another program. This upcoming winter and through next year will be a great time for someone to snatch some disgruntled staff from Audi. I don't think every manufacturer I listed earlier is capable of joining in two years, but there are some that can. Honda can and Peugeot can. They may not be competing for wins, but anything can happen. Any manufacturer can approach someone like Oreca on Onroak for chassis help, and existing teams can help with staff like Oreca and Toyota, or Joest and Audi. I bet there's guys out there that are just waiting to be part of a huge organization. Imagine Rebellion helping out the running of the car with a manufacturer like that. It may be unlikely, but it's not improbable.
|
|
|
31 Oct 2016, 17:09 (Ref:3684323) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,294
|
A ruleset or formula which allows cars from previous years to compete against "new" machinery is a must in my view and not in an "also ran" category, but with a real competitive chance.
Something has to be done about the costs, they need to be halved (at least). |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |
the end of prost as we know it? | PoweredByHonda | Formula One | 16 | 24 Nov 2001 13:24 |
The end of F1 as we know it? | Super Tourer | Formula One | 5 | 26 Oct 2001 13:58 |
The end of racecar aerodynamics as we know it | Franklin | Racing Technology | 10 | 10 Apr 2000 13:35 |