|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 Jul 2010, 15:44 (Ref:2722203) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
A1GP - Oh jeez, not that one again?
http://www.autosport.com/news/grapevine.php/id/85015
Looks like someone's setting sail for fail with this one, although a setup where they don't continually bail out the teams could be less unviable. I still think A1GP was not a good way of having a nations cup in motorsport, although the right way would probably need strong FIA involvement. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
5 Jul 2010, 16:24 (Ref:2722227) | #2 | ||
Admin
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,058
|
Lucky I kept my A1GP domain names then....
|
||
|
5 Jul 2010, 16:31 (Ref:2722231) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,195
|
We have a thread for this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npjOSLCR2hE
|
||
__________________
Give me a drink don't be talking so much you're a pain in the butt - Mick |
5 Jul 2010, 20:55 (Ref:2722352) | #4 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 393
|
For some reason my natural cynicism always gets deflected around A1GP. I've always thought it was a decent concept, with some great drivers and good racing - I still think there is a viable series in there somewhere.
Bloody typical of my cynical nature really. |
||
|
5 Jul 2010, 21:08 (Ref:2722360) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
It was a good basic concept (the concept of having some form of nations cup), but the problem was what A1GP did with the rest of the thing.
There were some good drivers, but there problem is that the best racing drivers tend to come from a few countries (some of whom weren't even represented in A1GP), meaning that there were number of consistently weak nations, which have practically no talent pool to draw from. Some of those drivers were simply not of the required calibre. That's why it would be better to have 10-12 2/3 car teams rather than however many one car teams. I agree that the basic concept is a good one, but not much more than that. Any attempt at that concept wouldn't need the A1 name, the A1 cars, the other bits of A1. It would need, however, direct running by the FIA. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
5 Jul 2010, 21:21 (Ref:2722365) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,364
|
Never mind the concept (which I thought was pants), look at the fun and racing (two different things) which the meetings produced.
Nice looking cars and a great sound. Hope they succeed. (How about a date at the re-opened Donington then?) Regards Jim |
||
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks. |
5 Jul 2010, 23:04 (Ref:2722398) | #7 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,454
|
|||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
6 Jul 2010, 14:58 (Ref:2722628) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,219
|
Yes please! Quite a few of the rounds had really good crowds, Zaandvoort, Brands Hatch, Kyalami etc, with a few others getting there, such as Malaysia and Mexico. I therefore still believe it could be viable.
Would be nice to see some of the better franchise holders from before get the first opportunity though, such as Ireland and New Zealand, as long as they can finance their teams. No need for the Alan Joneses and Emerson Fittipaldis who did nothing however. I miss it, hope we can see it back. |
||
|
6 Jul 2010, 15:27 (Ref:2722638) | #9 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
i don't see why they can't do some sort of shared ownership with superleague. a new a1gp series gets the cars in the winter and the superleague teams get them in the summer. teams can run both series so they can keep team members employed all year round.
|
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
6 Jul 2010, 15:54 (Ref:2722652) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
I'm a fan of Superleague and enjoy the races but I have a hard time seeing A1 come back and make it as well in this economic climate. I don't know that there is the room for it anymore. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
6 Jul 2010, 17:00 (Ref:2722672) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Quote:
The FIA running it could also open more doors. It would also mean that instead of being a regular series, it could be an annual one-off event, which is far more realistic if you want to create a bona fide nations cup type event that can be taken seriously. The thing is Superleague Formula already run a long series, they're currently scheduled to run from April to October. The A1GP season often went in to those months. Unless, of course, Superleague knock their expansion plans on the head. They've been talking about racing outside Europe for over a year ... |
|||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
6 Jul 2010, 18:05 (Ref:2722706) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
Jim W, does this mean you didn't like it?.... (which I thought was pants),
Sorry, sometimes I'm a bit numbty with translations ;} |
||
|
6 Jul 2010, 18:12 (Ref:2722709) | #13 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 386
|
It won't happen. A souffle can only rise once.
|
||
|
6 Jul 2010, 22:02 (Ref:2722809) | #14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,364
|
Quote:
(Two nations divided by a common language, only I'm sure that Churchill or whoever (opinion is divided) had rather more high flown expressions in mind.) Regards Jim |
|||
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks. |
7 Jul 2010, 08:59 (Ref:2722937) | #15 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
7 Jul 2010, 10:16 (Ref:2722970) | #16 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
I think it's a very good idea.
I'll admit I really missed A1GP over the winter, because it was something to watch when nothing else was going on, the cars were big and noisy and the drivers, whilst not top drawer, were mostly people I had heard of and good enough to put on a decent race. Last edited by strider; 7 Jul 2010 at 10:36. |
||
|
7 Jul 2010, 19:01 (Ref:2723169) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
7 Jul 2010, 19:07 (Ref:2723171) | #18 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,907
|
Quote:
In the first season I was really pumped up over it, that crowd at Brands was something to marvel at for a new initiative and then being able to watch live motor racing near Christmas as well was just fantastic! Some kind of merger between A1 and Superleague would as bella suggested be the best idea - keep the SL cars as the equipment though. |
|||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
7 Jul 2010, 20:50 (Ref:2723223) | #19 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,454
|
The main advantage of it was the original cars did produce some superb racing, with multi-car battles and overtaking. The replacements did away with that, weren't ready on time and were much more expensive ruining everything that was good about it.
The conspiracy theorist in me might suggest that it was a deliberate act by Ferrari and FIA to spoil something that was more interesting than F1/GP2, but that would just be me being silly, wouldn't it? |
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
7 Jul 2010, 20:55 (Ref:2723229) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
GP2 isn't anything to do with the FIA. Did Ferrari actually do all of the second generation car, or just badge it and provide engines?
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
8 Jul 2010, 09:17 (Ref:2723404) | #21 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,907
|
Who knows??!!!! I don't think you're far wrong with that though duke.
I don't think GP2 had anything to worry about with A1 with GP2 probably being the most entertaining single seater category out there at present. The GP2 Asia concept did make me think that someone somewhere wanted A1 to fall flat on its face though? |
||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
8 Jul 2010, 11:47 (Ref:2723459) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,219
|
I thought the second generation cars provided just as good racing as the first generation ones.
|
||
|
8 Jul 2010, 12:18 (Ref:2723476) | #23 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 10,322
|
The first generation cars just looked that bit madder though didn't they? The newer ones were "generic single seater", there was no mistaking the older ones though (incidentally - where did the old cars go to?)
|
||
|
8 Jul 2010, 13:05 (Ref:2723493) | #24 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 616
|
||
|
8 Jul 2010, 13:30 (Ref:2723507) | #25 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
weren't the first generation chassis just the old f3000 ones with some bodywork tweaks as well?
|
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fisi....<merged> | Knowlesy | Formula One | 37 | 3 May 2005 00:29 |
Couthard<->Kimi | roxana | Formula One | 35 | 4 Aug 2003 14:05 |
<<< ETCC steals BTCC appearence >>> | adamp_uk | Touring Car Racing | 6 | 15 Mar 2002 11:31 |