|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
29 Dec 2012, 22:53 (Ref:3182794) | #1 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 495
|
Hypercars as the new GT1s?
Apologies for the title choice, just to clarify this is a thread of pure speculation.
The newest DRIVE Shakedown video on Youtube brings up some good points as to whether the new generation of hypercars should usurp P1 cars as the pinnacle of sportscar racing. Or indeed should the new hypercars such as the McLaren P1, Ferrari F70, Porsche 918 etc. should become their own class, much like the FIA GT1 class. There are certainly many cars that would fit this category, and it would be great to see a return to the 'proper' GT1 class. Is there even a possibility that the 'GT1' cars could compete for an overall victory with the P1 cars, much like what we saw in 1995 with the WSP Porsches vs the McLarens et al. I would be very interested to hear your views. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bnOvdGdPnhE |
|
__________________
"How would you like a newspaper upside your head?" @MattMK45 |
29 Dec 2012, 23:18 (Ref:3182808) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,336
|
You know, that was exactly what I was thinking! Great minds think alike...
What I think should happen in Le Mans/FIA WEC events is a big alteration in class structure. I think LMP1 cars should only be for factory teams, and LMP2 cars stay the same, with teams like Rebellion, JRM, Strakka, and OAK going there full time. There's a big debate going on behind closed doors now about the cost of racing. A lot of teams, in the current economic climate, are being forced to file bankruptcy or limit their participation or downgrade in classes. I think the Le Mans racing world should stop forcing themselves so much... if you have the money, go with LMP1. If not, go to LMP2 or GT3 racing. I think GTE should be thrown out. In my opinion, it was much more interesting to watch GT1 and GT2 (the old version of GTE). GT2 and GTE is basically the same thing. I think GT2 cars shouldn't be quite as advanced and downgrade to GT3 specifications while GT1 cars should start to form their own factory teams, like factory McLaren, Ferrari, Audi, and Porsche teams, and facilitate it like I'm saying they should do with LMP1 and LMP2. I'm sure a lot of teams would be happy to downgrade if they could still race with LMP1s in the FIA WEC. I think, right now, that's the smartest choice. I'd like to see in GT1... Pagani Huayra Lamborghini Aventador Ferrari F70 Porsche 918 Chevrolet C7 McLaren P1 Koenigsegg Agera R Nissan GT-R Aston Martin One-77 Audi R20 (possibly in 2016) et cetera... |
||
|
29 Dec 2012, 23:28 (Ref:3182812) | #3 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 495
|
I totally agree with you there, especially on the P1 front. I find it remarkable how teams such as Oak spend millions of euros to be in a class that they have little to no chance of winning. JRM and Strakka are slightly different seeing as they could potentially become a Honda works or satellite team in the near future.
GT3 are more or less as fast as GTE cars now, or I predict that they will be by the end of 2013. So it would make sense for GTE, being much more expensive than GT3 to be dropped. If you look at images of the 2013 Ferrari 458 testing, it has almost the same amount of aero flaps and wings than the 2012 GTE 458, if not slightly thinner. It would be much more cost effective for teams to run cars if the WEC adopted GT3 rules. For the GT1 cars, the list is very large, like you have pointed out. I found out that McLaren never envisaged racing the F1, yet did so as there was such a great demand for owners to take theirs racing. Admittedly, it would be more difficult to do that now, but perhaps this might be the case. Besides, the new crop of hypercars are too good to just simply exist for the road, they need to prove their worth on the track as well. |
|
__________________
"How would you like a newspaper upside your head?" @MattMK45 |
30 Dec 2012, 00:11 (Ref:3182821) | #4 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,044
|
I've said for a while that it would be amazing to go back to a time where LMPs and "GT1" style machinery can compete for the win. There should be more than one way to skin a cat.
Currently to win Le Mans you can have freedom in terms of energy and tech but you are pushed into an LMP1 mould which makes all the cars look very similar. That's not really in the spirit of sportscars and endurance racing so hopefully something can change in the long-term. |
|
|
30 Dec 2012, 00:29 (Ref:3182825) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 544
|
It would be absolutely fantastic for about 2 years, before every manufacturer apart from the one winning the championship pulled out due to spiraling costs. Much like the original GT1 in fact.
|
||
__________________
Louise: Is the track Slippery when Wet? DC: I didn't know you were a Bon Jovi fan |
30 Dec 2012, 09:16 (Ref:3182891) | #6 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 495
|
Quote:
I do hope the FIA/ACO see the potential in this new class, a lot of the new hypercars have some sort of KERS system as standard, which fits into the Organisation's ideals. |
||
__________________
"How would you like a newspaper upside your head?" @MattMK45 |
30 Dec 2012, 10:53 (Ref:3182920) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
I think they should use supercars as the main class in the unified American series instead of the Frankenclass of DPs/P2s they're proposing. P2 numbers are looking very low for 2013 in ALMS and the issues with DPs are somewhat obvious. Call the supercar class GTP and have the 2014 merged GTE/GT3 class as the secondary class split into a Pro class and an Am class - call the Pro class GTO and the Am class GTU.
Leave P1/P2/GT Pro+Am alone for WEC/Le Mans, if it ain't broke etc. |
||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
30 Dec 2012, 11:55 (Ref:3182937) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 664
|
The problem with hypercars in a GT1 class are the costs. Some hypercars cost over 1 million dollar/euro. Transfering those cars into GT1 race cars will cost even more. There's no manufacture that will do that, especially not in the current economic climate.
But let's say that the manufacturers will do it. Then the only cars we will see are from Porsche and Ferrari. Perhaps also McLaren. Audi doesn't have a hypercar, neither does Nissan, Mercedes-Benz, Lexus and Corvette. Koenigsegg, Pagani, Zenvo, Hennessey, etc. are too small to produce a competitive race car. Even Lamborghini is probably too small. If they do produce a competitive race car, then it's probably only for 1 or 2 years. Development costs will become too high. (I'm not so sure about Aston Martin.) |
||
|
30 Dec 2012, 13:32 (Ref:3182949) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
|
Quote:
Seriously, there's no way hypercars could compete in GT1 on this current economy. And second, putting the GT-R and Corvette against the likes of Pagani, Koenigsegg, etc. would look out of place as demonstrated in 2010 and 2011 FIA GT1 season. (although the MC-12 is even look more out-of-place than the rest of the field) |
||
|
30 Dec 2012, 14:00 (Ref:3182960) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 750
|
Quote:
a class of f70, mclaren p1, renault alpine etc would be awesome to watch, but such a "gt1" class doesnt belong to lemans or the wec. Also i fail to see why would such a gt class replace any lmp class. Lemans and the wec should absolutely keep the prototype + gt formula. Also, about what was said in the video, theres already a production based class at le mans, so there is no need to introduce another, the aco should be focusing on getting the gte-gt3 merger right. |
||
|
30 Dec 2012, 01:47 (Ref:3182856) | #11 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,491
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
30 Dec 2012, 16:59 (Ref:3183005) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,192
|
Interesting thread:
Quote:
Today trend in motorsports (out of F1) is manufacturer support or "Gentlemen" support, lets be serious, if so many million Euros cars are sold, if only a part of this wealthy people where interested on racing a PRO-AM class would be sustainable: - 300 Stock veyron sold - Grandsport + Supersport + SE - + 100 pagani's - + ??? koenisegggs - + 20 Reventon - + 20 Sesto elemento - + 400 Ferrari enzo - + 100 Mclaren f1 - + 50 Maserati MC12 - + 12 MC12 Corsa - + 77 AMR one - + other brands Potential buyers more than a million € in two generations 15 years. |
|||
|
30 Dec 2012, 17:49 (Ref:3183015) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
So, we are going to create an ultra expensive GT category, where other expensive categories have failed, or are failing, and somehow expect that to be the marquee category of a new series?
Such a category might be a wonderful fantasy, but it is simply a fantasy without any link to reality. |
||
|
30 Dec 2012, 19:22 (Ref:3183031) | #14 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 495
|
Like I said before, this is purely speculative, and yes whilst there are a lot of constraints that would trouble this series, I still think there could be potential in a few years when the economy is somewhat better.
|
|
__________________
"How would you like a newspaper upside your head?" @MattMK45 |
31 Dec 2012, 01:44 (Ref:3183165) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,814
|
Quote:
It might be near impossible to think of this with the current Sportscar rulebooks and it'd probably be very tough to create a rulebook in which named hypercars can be raced but let's face it, these cars should be raced nonetheless! I mean Sportscar/GT racing can't take itself seriously any longer when the specs of the topclass roadcars far exceed the specs or performance of the LMP2's and GTE's can they? On top of that, it's just a darn shame that fantastic machines such as the Zonda R, 599XX, MC12 Corsa and most all of the afore mentioned hypercars are bound to trundle along in dedicated one make 'playing hours' or some even completely banned from racing, or even driving, from the worlds tracks... |
|||
|
31 Dec 2012, 02:30 (Ref:3183177) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,567
|
If the manufacturers make these cars and people want to race them theres obviously an interest. A series coould be made for specific cars like this.
|
|
|
31 Dec 2012, 03:24 (Ref:3183183) | #17 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
I'd say, since the people who can afford these cars have so much money, and thuis influence.they could have easily found someone to organize a series---if they wanted to race. (I'd wager plenty of them are businesspersons of sufficient acumen they could probably start their own series and run it better than almost all of what we have out there now.)
People who buy these cars don't want to race---else they'd be racing, in those cars or something else. People who buy those cars are either investors or people who want to make a certain type of public statement. If they really wanted to drive as fast as those cars could go --- they'd be on track doing it. It seems like a good idea, until it is examined. As I mentioned, performance balancing would be a huge problem---no supercar manufacturer wants to have its product slowed down to race a competitor. Safety and suspension adju8tstablility would be two more huge issues. Basically a customer would have to either buy a body in white or buy a $1,000,000 car and rip its guts out, then rebuild half of it to make it safe and to give it a competition-suited suspension. Or, they could all run stock---fun to watch expensive things explode. "I mean Sportscar/GT racing can't take itself seriously any longer when the specs of the topclass roadcars far exceed the specs or performance of the LMP2's and GTE's can they? " Really up to you to decide that for yourself. Tell me, which of those supercars exceeds P2 performance? In a straight line and for one top-speed run? How about for a lap of Le Mans? Seems to me the fastest times at the Nurburgring aren't held by supercars, but by racing cars. Let's see how many hours a Zonda lasts. Let's see if any of them can really stop like a P2, and let's see how they do after the 15th or 25th time, when the brakes are used up. If performance is merely the manufacturer's claimed top speed, well, we should all be watching top fuel dragsters. Personally, I like sports car racing, and I'd put a P2 against any of the cars listed in an actual sports car race. Really, though, none of what I think matters. if the people who can afford the cars want to race, they will race. The fact that they have all the ability they need to race their cars if they want. but choose not to, tells the story. As for Grand Alms bringing in a Hypercar top class---Professional racing (as opposed to club racing) is a business. If the series organizers thought that a hypercar series would be profitable, they'd do it. Think it through---manufacturers of either prototypes or competitive GT cars have to spend huge bucks to design and refine to produce a racing vehicle. Who is going to put up the money to develop a racing version of Pagani Huayra or a Bugatti Veyron? Not the manufacturers, who don't need the advertising and likely couldn't afford to spend the millions with no RoI. Therefore the owners---who already aren't racing---would have to spend the money to develop proper competition versions. Not likely, based on the fact that it hasn't happened. So why would Grand Alms want to create a top class for cars which no one wants to actually build and race? How would that make sense? Make no mistake---if those cars were to compete, I would be a huge fan. But ... the fact that we'd like stuff doesn't really make it happen---Otherwise we'd all be watching Camel GT and GTP cars, while waiting for the Can Am cars to run. |
|
|
31 Dec 2012, 10:10 (Ref:3183244) | #18 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 495
|
My thoughts exactly, if there is a supply of cars and demand to go racing, it will happen in some capacity. Like I said before, McLaren never dreamed of racing the F1, yet did so and won Le Mans!
|
|
__________________
"How would you like a newspaper upside your head?" @MattMK45 |
31 Dec 2012, 10:14 (Ref:3183248) | #19 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 495
|
We should write a petition to take all of the new hypercars the Sultan of Brunei is inevitably going to buy (I believe he had 4x McLaren F1's at one point!) and make him race them. Apparently they are hardly ever driven at all, just sold on for a profit.
If you have seen this guy's car collection, you will know what I mean! PS: Apologies for the double post |
|
__________________
"How would you like a newspaper upside your head?" @MattMK45 |
31 Dec 2012, 05:18 (Ref:3183187) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,567
|
You're wrong if you don't think there's lots of owners that want to track their supercars, hypercars, sportscars etc. Where else are they going to be able to go all out with them? Because the streets aren't suitable. So why buy a car like this if it's not just a 'status symbol'? Even though a majority of owners may not track their cars, it doesn't take a majority to race! There's 4 LMP1's from the factory now. If there are 500 of these new Ferrari's, McLaren's, Koenigsegg's etc. it only takes 2 or 3 owners of each car to commit to this type of series. The FXX, the 599XX are just examples of million dollar plus vehicles in their own little series.
|
|
|
31 Dec 2012, 06:11 (Ref:3183189) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,263
|
Nice dream, financially horrific.
|
||
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House |
31 Dec 2012, 08:50 (Ref:3183220) | #22 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,567
|
The people that own these cars aren't pressed for cash. If they want to run a series like this, they have the means. So no, it wouldn't be financially horrific. All you would have to do is stipulate the cars being a certain minimum weight and 'run what you brung' type attitude. Rules are rules, and if something like this ever took place you could be sure there would be some in place to keep things interesting. But I don't see it happening anytime soon, sadly.
|
|
|
31 Dec 2012, 13:58 (Ref:3183295) | #23 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,900
|
Quote:
Fist of all Rich people don't trow their money away. Even if they have it, theyd much rather have a sponsor doing the paying then doing it out of their own pockets. Second. none of these cars are anywhere near race ready in their street trim. The Ferrari and Mclarnens suspension would break afer a few hours, the engines would overheat etc, etc.. they are built to be fast toys that you can take for a few laps around a track, not race them for 24h. In the porsche the battery system would probably exploed after a few hours of torture... So you and up wiht a huge ass overhaul to make a race car out of them. If we know that it takes a few Million to run a GTE PRO race car/team, you can bet that running a hyper KERS car would easily cost a lot more, and at that point you can run a privateer LMP1 effort. +there is alse the point that the respective factories are very ****ed off if you even attemt to race their babies. For example Porsche actively suppressed and Carrera GT being raced anywhere. Ferrari got realy ****ed at Jim for his P4/5 racer. To the point that now you have to sign a contract with ferrari when ordering the new car basicly saying that you wont race it etc... And without Manufacturer support, and factory drivers, and development, the series would be meaning less... Hyper cars are not built to be raced now. the closest you can get to buying a sports car and racing it is the Porsche 911 GT3 RS. The 997 versions, as even Porsche has screwed this up in the new version you get the non drysumped engine which simply wouldn't survive racing. |
|||
__________________
To launch a new FIA GT2 category based on strict technical rules, with limited wavers and ‘balance of performance' limited to success ballast. A category where GT manufacturers will prove through competition they can produce the best road going GT car. |
31 Dec 2012, 15:31 (Ref:3183320) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,532
|
Hmm... Hypercars or LMP1's. It's like being forced between the best desserts in the world. [・_・;]
Well, I'd say the Ferrari FXX is a proof of concept of hypercar racing, but would it look out of place racing against Audi R18's? Then again, World GT1 did serve as that hypercar playground. Shame it's gone, I miss those glorious sounds from the Lamborghini SV-R's. |
||
__________________
Entire team is babies. |
31 Dec 2012, 16:48 (Ref:3183338) | #25 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,336
|
Quote:
Quote:
You can't be that, what's the word, SCROOGULENT (I just coined a new word), or else you won't be racing in the first place. A lot of drivers who have been around for years like Marc Goossens, Peter Kox, Mike Hezemans, Tomas Enge, etc., who prefer GT cars over LMP1 cars and would gladly race cars just as expensive (granted they themselves don't have the money) that are slower but more fun for them to drive. I'm a big GT fan, so I can understand... I'd rather race GTE or "GT1" than LMP2 or LMP1, although either would be fine by me. |
||||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24] Le Mans and No GT1s - Opinions? | MrWinkyHead | 24 Heures du Mans | 13 | 20 Apr 2011 17:45 |
The GT1s | sssssssss | Sportscar & GT Racing | 50 | 15 Jul 2008 06:09 |
Lotus Elise GT1s?? | kmchow | Sportscar & GT Racing | 12 | 18 Feb 2005 03:09 |
Lotus Elise GT1s ALMS 2003 | JAG | North American Racing | 5 | 16 Oct 2002 07:32 |
Racing series for older GT1s? | kmchow | Sportscar & GT Racing | 4 | 11 Apr 2000 08:03 |