Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing > North American Racing

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 Sep 2012, 18:56 (Ref:3128359)   #1
hondafan37
Veteran
 
hondafan37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Argentina
Buenos Aires, Argentine
Posts: 1,931
hondafan37 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridhondafan37 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
ALMS/Grand Am Fusion 2014

Ok this is the new thread all were asking.
http://auto-racing.speedtv.com/artic...alizing-merger
hondafan37 is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 18:58 (Ref:3128360)   #2
gucom
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 254
gucom should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
PLEASE let them have sensible rules for the prototypes, preferably with a strong link to the ACO rule cars...
gucom is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:00 (Ref:3128362)   #3
rustyfan
Veteran
 
rustyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Sweden
Posts: 5,419
rustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I think it'll be good, it'll bring the top teams from both sides together which in theory should make for a solid field.

I wonder what rules they'll use though. Surely the differences between the LMP and DP machinery are too great to allow for any sort of parity without restricting, I assume, the LMPs to death?
rustyfan is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:09 (Ref:3128375)   #4
Matt
Veteran
 
Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
United States
Connecticut
Posts: 7,175
Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by rustyfan View Post
I think it'll be good, it'll bring the top teams from both sides together which in theory should make for a solid field.

I wonder what rules they'll use though. Surely the differences between the LMP and DP machinery are too great to allow for any sort of parity without restricting, I assume, the LMPs to death?
DP to be P2?

P1 cars are current P1's with large restrictor P2's?
Matt is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:23 (Ref:3128385)   #5
gucom
Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 254
gucom should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Maybe not the ideal topic for this question, but it's very well possible that this'll also affect the new merger series...

the SPEED article says GA is going to introduce a GX class in 2013, with alternative means of propulsion. Googling for GX, I find the Lotus Evora GX, which is basically a modified GT4 car, but also Mazda is offering a sky-active diesel engine, without a chassis... how would that work?!? does GX accept both GT's and prototypes?

another question: how do current LMP2's compare to DP's, speed-wise?
gucom is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:27 (Ref:3128391)   #6
Matt
Veteran
 
Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
United States
Connecticut
Posts: 7,175
Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!Matt is going for a new lap record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by gucom View Post
Maybe not the ideal topic for this question, but it's very well possible that this'll also affect the new merger series...

the SPEED article says GA is going to introduce a GX class in 2013, with alternative means of propulsion. Googling for GX, I find the Lotus Evora GX, which is basically a modified GT4 car, but also Mazda is offering a sky-active diesel engine, without a chassis... how would that work?!? does GX accept both GT's and prototypes?

another question: how do current LMP2's compare to DP's, speed-wise?
Current DP's are slightly quicker than ALMS GT, iirc.

Now the time to give the DP's about 300 more horsepower and some more downforce. GTP 2.0
Matt is offline  
Old 7 Nov 2012, 01:33 (Ref:3163577)   #7
daallo
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Mexico
Mexico
Posts: 87
daallo should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
LMP2s are faster by a few seconds.
daallo is offline  
Old 7 Nov 2012, 01:39 (Ref:3163578)   #8
Maelochs
Veteran
 
Maelochs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
Maelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameMaelochs will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
The DP motto: "We might not be cheaper, but at least we are slower ..."

I can't understand why this class never caught on.
Maelochs is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 20:24 (Ref:3128456)   #9
Articus
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
Articus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Also lets not forget the glaring GT issue here. The current ACO GTE cars are as quick if not faster than the Daytona prototypes....And how do you explain why the ESM Ferrari GT2 is 10 seconds quicker than the AIM Autosport FXDD Ferrari..
Articus is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 20:26 (Ref:3128458)   #10
picchiofan
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Iran
Posts: 385
picchiofan User has been fined for unsportsmanlike behaviour!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Articus View Post
And how do you explain why the ESM Ferrari GT2 is 10 seconds quicker than the AIM Autosport FXDD Ferrari..
One is built to GT2 specs, the other is built to GT3 specs and then adjusted based to the ruleset and performance standards mandated by the sanctioning body.

That didn't seem too hard.
picchiofan is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 20:30 (Ref:3128462)   #11
Articus
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
Articus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by picchiofan View Post
One is built to GT2 specs, the other is built to GT3 specs and then adjusted based to the ruleset and performance standards mandated by the sanctioning body.

That didn't seem too hard.
Yes I know thats the answer. The problem is it looks a bit silly to have two Corvette's, two Ferrari's, two M3's, two Porsches running around in the same race all withthe same names. This is why the makes did not build cars for both GT1 and GT1. Why would Porsche build both GT1 and GT2, then Ferrari both classes let alone a 458 GT1 and 458 GT2. Then Aston both classes. It presents the same issue with GTE and GRand-GT
Articus is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 20:34 (Ref:3128466)   #12
picchiofan
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Iran
Posts: 385
picchiofan User has been fined for unsportsmanlike behaviour!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Articus View Post
Yes I know thats the answer. The problem is it looks a bit silly to have two Corvette's, two Ferrari's, two M3's, two Porsches running around in the same race all withthe same names. This is why the makes did not build cars for both GT1 and GT1. Why would Porsche build both GT1 and GT2, then Ferrari both classes let alone a 458 GT1 and 458 GT2. Then Aston both classes. It presents the same issue with GTE and GRand-GT
So, why does Porsche build a GTE spec car and a GTC spec one?

You would have had a *real* hard time following sports cars in the 90's.
picchiofan is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 20:34 (Ref:3128467)   #13
FordCosworthPanoz
Veteran
 
FordCosworthPanoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Bermuda
Flatts Village
Posts: 4,016
FordCosworthPanoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridFordCosworthPanoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridFordCosworthPanoz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Bon Débarras ACO!
FordCosworthPanoz is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:00 (Ref:3128363)   #14
NightStalk3r
Veteran
 
NightStalk3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
United Kingdom
Wiltshire, England
Posts: 3,487
NightStalk3r should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridNightStalk3r should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Grand-Am running the show? NO THANKS!
NightStalk3r is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:03 (Ref:3128366)   #15
Jonerz
Veteran
 
Jonerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
United States
Youston
Posts: 2,025
Jonerz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJonerz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by gucom View Post
PLEASE let them have sensible rules for the prototypes, preferably with a strong link to the ACO rule cars...
I am hoping so, as well. American control on the rules, but links to the 24 Hours of Le Mans. Make international racing STRONGER where the WEC has failed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NightStalk3r View Post
Grand-Am running the show? NO THANKS!
I too have my worries over GA, more so of NASCAR. Especially with the improvements Grand-Am has been making to their management of late.

Chris
Jonerz is offline  
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan.
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:04 (Ref:3128367)   #16
DS"
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Germany
Germany
Posts: 824
DS" should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I don't like the thought of NASCAR running sportscar racing and thus having a large stake in road racing. They'll probably go after IndyCar next, so any competition to their holy Sprint Cup can be eliminated. It's just like when WWE bought WCW. This was a day when pro wrestling died, and the day where a major part of sportscar racing dies will probably come. But hey, we've still got WEC, right?
DS" is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:04 (Ref:3128368)   #17
MulsanneMike
Veteran
 
MulsanneMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
Posts: 1,831
MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!
ALMS is dead. This allows Don to bow out and Grand-Am to take over. Grand-Am wins. Will be spun as some BS "merger", but the only ones who will believe that are the talking heads on the stage.
MulsanneMike is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:12 (Ref:3128379)   #18
The Badger
Veteran
 
The Badger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location:
Innsbruck , Austria
Posts: 13,763
The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!The Badger has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MulsanneMike View Post
ALMS is dead. This allows Don to bow out and Grand-Am to take over. Grand-Am wins. Will be spun as some BS "merger", but the only ones who will believe that are the talking heads on the stage.
Fair dues ..... dont know what to make of this at all ..... Im reeling !!!
The Badger is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:14 (Ref:3128381)   #19
Jonerz
Veteran
 
Jonerz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
United States
Youston
Posts: 2,025
Jonerz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJonerz should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Badger View Post
Fair dues ..... dont know what to make of this at all ..... Im reeling !!!
Agreed, it could be the death of real PROTOTYPE racing in America, or it could be a much needed infusion of money and common sense...

Chris
Jonerz is offline  
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan.
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:20 (Ref:3128382)   #20
MulsanneMike
Veteran
 
MulsanneMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
Posts: 1,831
MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!MulsanneMike has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonerz View Post
Agreed, it could be the death of real PROTOTYPE racing in America, or it could be a much needed infusion of money and common sense...

Chris
It won't be. Grand-Am's singular purpose was to muddy the racing market outside of NASCAR, to effectively build a monopoly. And they have done that by (effectively) killing the ALMS and all their machinations in the CART/IRL wars.
MulsanneMike is offline  
Old 1 Sep 2012, 19:27 (Ref:3128392)   #21
rustyfan
Veteran
 
rustyfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Sweden
Posts: 5,419
rustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridrustyfan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
I think it'll sort itself out somehow.

I mean, when Heath Ledger got the part as the Joker in the Dark Knight a lot of people ruled it out as a fiasco straight away, saying it wouldn't work and so forth and in the end it turned out to be bloody fantastic.

Point being: let's wait until we get some actual details on the 2014 plans before we decide to declare prototype racing in North America dead and buried.
rustyfan is offline  
Old 24 Sep 2012, 05:09 (Ref:3140660)   #22
Ncrdbl1
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 93
Ncrdbl1 is heading for a stewards' enquiry!
Quote:
Originally Posted by MulsanneMike View Post
ALMS is dead. This allows Don to bow out and Grand-Am to take over. Grand-Am wins. Will be spun as some BS "merger", but the only ones who will believe that are the talking heads on the stage.
So good to see at least one other person who gets it. The only card the ALMS has right now is their tie in to LeMans. I guess many do not realize that the NASCAR family has had a hand in road racing even before Grand-Am. It was Bill Sr who put up the money to create IMSA.

As for the future. In shear numbers the LMPs cannot touch the DP. In 2012 there were two full time cars in the LMP1, LMP2 and LMPC classes. Been a number of part time that helped fill the field but only 6 full time cars in all three combined. The DP saw 9 full time cars in 2012 and have 11 confirmed for 2013 with 2 more rumored.

The GT class is the strong point for ALMS but even there Grand-Am has more full time cars. 12 GA/GT compared to 11 full time ALMS GT. The GTC did raise the numbers some. Both Audi and Ferrari joined Grand-Am in 2012 with Aston Martin joining the GT class for 2013. It would be very easy for the GTC to move to Grand-Am with only minor changes. GT3 right now is the strongest GT class world wide right now. The Blancpain series is growing and it could open the door for other manufacturers to join Grand-Am. The series has spent the better part of the last two years in Europe visiting manufacturers and discussing rules changes to allow the FIA GT3 cars to run. The main modification would be thicker tubing in their roll cages, no anti lock brakes or traction control. Plus the addition of a front end splitter, and Grand-Am air inlets and rear wings. Right now two (Spa and Daytona) of the three top 24 hour events run GT3. The ACO added GT3 to the ELMS in an attempt to keep it afloat. Price wise i think the GT3 format would be more attractive than GTE. If LeMans would drop GTE AM and replace it with GT3 it would fix the majority of the problems in road racing.
Ncrdbl1 is offline  
Old 24 Sep 2012, 05:23 (Ref:3140663)   #23
Canada ALMS fan
Veteran
 
Canada ALMS fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Canada
Calgary, Canada
Posts: 2,299
Canada ALMS fan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCanada ALMS fan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCanada ALMS fan should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
How many DPs would legitimately exist without some sort of hand out from the series??? Just because the car count is higher doesn't mean those are the cars the fans are interested in, the amateur racers who provide the remainder of the funding series does not like them because they are less expensive to run than ACO cars. There have been more than 9 LMPs in every round of the ALMS though if you want to play the "our series has more cars than yours" agrument. You GA guys can preach to have the superior series and look down your noses all you want, if those are the cars we are left with the fans will leave in droves. All you have to do is look at attendance... It's time to stop picking sides and time to work together to make the unified series the best it can be. The reality is there are aspects of both series that can add value. As has been said a million times -The ALMS fans are just scared the series will get dumbed down, and we fully entitled to worry about that.
Canada ALMS fan is offline  
Old 24 Sep 2012, 16:40 (Ref:3140970)   #24
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada ALMS fan View Post
How many DPs would legitimately exist without some sort of hand out from the series??? Just because the car count is higher doesn't mean those are the cars the fans are interested in, the amateur racers who provide the remainder of the funding series does not like them because they are less expensive to run than ACO cars. There have been more than 9 LMPs in every round of the ALMS though if you want to play the "our series has more cars than yours" agrument. You GA guys can preach to have the superior series and look down your noses all you want, if those are the cars we are left with the fans will leave in droves. All you have to do is look at attendance... It's time to stop picking sides and time to work together to make the unified series the best it can be. The reality is there are aspects of both series that can add value. As has been said a million times -The ALMS fans are just scared the series will get dumbed down, and we fully entitled to worry about that.

Yep!



L.P.
HORNDAWG is offline  
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent
Old 24 Sep 2012, 17:44 (Ref:3141000)   #25
Livininthinair
Veteran
 
Livininthinair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
United States
Colorado
Posts: 1,099
Livininthinair should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridLivininthinair should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canada ALMS fan View Post
How many DPs would legitimately exist without some sort of hand out from the series??? Just because the car count is higher doesn't mean those are the cars the fans are interested in, the amateur racers who provide the remainder of the funding series does not like them because they are less expensive to run than ACO cars. There have been more than 9 LMPs in every round of the ALMS though if you want to play the "our series has more cars than yours" agrument. You GA guys can preach to have the superior series and look down your noses all you want, if those are the cars we are left with the fans will leave in droves. All you have to do is look at attendance... It's time to stop picking sides and time to work together to make the unified series the best it can be. The reality is there are aspects of both series that can add value. As has been said a million times -The ALMS fans are just scared the series will get dumbed down, and we fully entitled to worry about that.

Perfectly stated - I think you have hit on something all of us feel/fear. When this was first announced I was very upset and ractionary thinking the sky was indeed falling. Well, we are now looking at a (merged) series and everyone involved must work together to make it a product the fans will find interesting and the teams can be proud of. In my opinion this includes Prototype and GT cars that have an ACO link not just GTE...


The thought of changing the ACO GTE/GT2 formula to GT3 would not get us where we are wanting to go (in my opinion), GTE is very near perfect as is. Adding GT3 as an under class to GTE/GT2 would allow teams to compete without having the budget of Corvette racing ect. + some teams don't have the budget or interest in going to LeMans, so let them run in GT3 and keep GT2/GTE for the teams that want the ACO connection.

In addition to the comment about attendance - almost every Grand Am race I watch (on tv, have not been in person - only to ALMS races in person) it seems like there is nobody there.
Livininthinair is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2013 Ford Fusion/Mondeo I Rosputnik Road Car Forum 8 19 Jan 2012 03:18
Saving ALMS and Grand-AM cthib10 North American Racing 31 25 Jul 2009 02:17
fusion racing Pro Racer Australasian Touring Cars. 16 8 Apr 2006 01:12
ALMS vs. Grand-Am Geva racing North American Racing 5 22 Mar 2001 07:00


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.