|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
20 Nov 2009, 15:06 (Ref:2585859) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Interesting Item on New Chassis in Indy Star (Merged)
Check out this bit of news...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.indystar.com/article/2009...ylvania-tunnel Apparently the radical chassis design is from Ben Bowlby, formerly Lola's chief designer and now part of Ganassi. It looks like a cross between a sports car and a motorcycle and is sleek and new age. Ganassi, Michael Andretti, and Tony George at least are all pushing for this design. Dallara is the other chassis being considered and would be an evolution of the existing design. Here's some interesting stuff thoughts from Bowlby in Racecar Engineering about what he'd want a new car to be. Sounds like it'd be lightweight, fuel efficient, and with many areas on the car to tweak. http://www.racecar-engineering.com/a...polis-500.html Last edited by Tim Northcutt; 20 Nov 2009 at 15:11. |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
20 Nov 2009, 19:45 (Ref:2586010) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
I read all this last night, and it left me feeling a little duped.
Ganassi and Penske get TEAM money, right? They both have enough money to pay engineering staffs and finance research facilities to maintain 7 year old spec cars, while hundreds of mechanics are out of work because the little teams can't afford to race. So Bowlby is making six figures on a team that has an eight figure annual operating budget, and he wants to get paid by IRL to draw a concept car. Oh, OK. And a Series that is afraid to introduce any regulation changes because of the economic impact is instead going to do a total redesign, requiring a complete refitting by all teams and rendering their existing investment obsolete. Yeah, I get that too. In the meantime, fans get most of their news from one guy who writes whatever the key players tell him to write. No wonder it's hard to figure out what is going on with IndyCar. On one hand, we might not be watching 20 old tubs racing run their first race of the season because the funding couldn't be generated. On the other, there will be a fleet of shiny new lunar rovers on the grid in two years. I suppose the truth lies somewhere in between the two extremes. Or there isn't any truth coming from these people at all. Last edited by JagtechOhio; 20 Nov 2009 at 20:00. |
||
|
20 Nov 2009, 19:58 (Ref:2586014) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
TEAM Money replaced paying out purses so that the smaller teams would get a more consistent cut for racing.
Little fish got about $30,000 for racing in the back under the old system. Now they get an average of about $65,000 a race, not including the 500. A typical winner's purse was somewhere between $110,000 and $150,000 per race (excluding Indy) prior to TEAM, so just with their wins, not to mention higher placed finishes, how much more do you think they would have gotten than their $1.2 million as part of TEAM? I say if the IRL is intersted, they should commission a design and put some money where there mouth is... Why should Ganassi do it for free if there is no commitment to interest via cash from the IRL in the potential chassis design? |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
20 Nov 2009, 20:04 (Ref:2586019) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
Oh, thanks. It all makes perfect sense now.
|
||
|
20 Nov 2009, 21:17 (Ref:2586047) | #5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
I don't know if ganassi would be the main money man behind that because there are others that rent that laurel hill tunnel out and those that do like to keep quiet about it. So there is probably more to the story than what is written.
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
20 Nov 2009, 21:23 (Ref:2586050) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
It might be going bye bye anyways: http://www.ibj.com/the-score/2009/11...AMS/post/11252 Sounds like Belskus is a hatchet man getting the company lean and mean ready for sale. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
20 Nov 2009, 21:29 (Ref:2586053) | #7 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Quote:
Schoettle is blowing smoke rings out his butt on some of the other stuff, like dumping the Brickyard 400...even with 170,000 people in the stands (last year's attendance), they still made money off of it. While you're at it, care to comment on the IZOD Title Sponsorship, which is a 6-year deal worth between $10-15 million per year with an option to extend two years? I noticed you've been kinda quiet on that one... |
|||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
20 Nov 2009, 22:25 (Ref:2586078) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
I didn't say anything about Ganassi paying to design a new car.
If this Bowlby dude is an ex-Lola designer on Ganassi's payroll, he's a rich guy with not much to do and access to tools to design whatever he wants. So he can pull a Bill Gates, build some three wheeler in his boss' tunnel and sell it to IRL. He can also get Curt Cavin to write "news" about him if he needs to attract investors. How a new V6 turbo is going to fit in a three wheeler is his problem. Izod sells clothes, not IndyCars. They spent a ton of money last year on advertising and "activations", a whole lot more than anyone ever heard of or paid attention to. So next year they will spend a few million more, and throw some chump change at the teams on top of that. That will sell a lot more rags and attract a few more fans. If they were putting a large amount of their investment towards the ICS, Reay would already have a new seat poured. They're clothiers with a large marketing budget, period. It they don't see big ROI they'll walk post haste. |
||
|
20 Nov 2009, 22:29 (Ref:2586086) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
I think it's great for them if they have that deal in place and the money comes in. How much will actually make it to the teams and make a different to them I suspect not a lot. Most of it also is around $6-$7 million of tv commercials of which I'm sure goes to Versus or ABC and not to the irl themselves. Of all I have seen and heard it sounds like big numbers but most of it when you break it down is fluff that I don't see as making a big $$ to most involved. In regards to the job cuts and other events at the speedway, I'm sure for one thing there was a lot of dead weight and tony george frumpies hanging about so hopefully they keep the shop vac running to clean all that out. I was always surprised when they built the F1 track they didn't set it up so it could be used on a daily basis for track days, schools, manufacturer events, testing, club days, etc. Seems like they are leaving potential daily revenue on the table, especially considering all the people they employ to run the place. I never bought into the "aura" of the track that it needs only be used for the 500. It's an old track with history but no reason why you can't maximize the use of the place. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
22 Nov 2009, 00:35 (Ref:2586730) | #10 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,751
|
Quote:
As for Dallara, I saw some prospective pics of a Dallara with a turbo engine in it and it looked very much like the current car without an air box; rather Reynardesque. |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Nov 2009, 01:10 (Ref:2586738) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,620
|
By air box you mean the body piece above the engine and behind the roll hoop? It should be compulsory in every formula car. When a car flips and lands, it protects the driver's head much better that a thin roll hoop.
|
||
|
22 Nov 2009, 01:37 (Ref:2586746) | #12 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,751
|
That's the air box and helps force air in to the cars cylinders. It's removable and allows access to the engine, particularly the spark plugs and rocker covers. The roll hoop's compulsory but there's no air box mounted above the engine on an F3 car, it's at the left hand side.
Indy Cars during the CART era needed no air box as engine aspiration is provided by the turbo charger. In F1 they were banned from 1975 to 1989, partly because they got too big and dangerous if there was a crash and in the early 80s because of the turbo era, they were not needed. |
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Nov 2009, 01:54 (Ref:2586750) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 10,620
|
That's it, I thought so. Thanks for the explanation.
|
||
|
22 Nov 2009, 02:06 (Ref:2586753) | #14 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,751
|
No problem. An interesting device is the air box. It first appeared in 1971 and was notably used by the Tyrrell and March teams. By 1975 they got ridiculously big, check out the Ligier JS 5, if that car had been in a serious crash, who knows what would have happened.
One problem with the air box is drag, so Red Bull and Renault and Toyota added a fin that extended to the rear wing. |
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
23 Nov 2009, 17:28 (Ref:2587931) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,229
|
My all time favorite for design excess. I posted a picture of it on another forum and somebody called it the "Smurf car". It's just bodywork, though. I don't see any reason there would be crash issues. The stuff inside was just like what the other teams were running. An airbox connected to trumpets.
|
||
|
23 Nov 2009, 14:22 (Ref:2587822) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
That's what I could learn from a friend of mine who lives not far from Ganassi's HQ:
1)TG is upset with the current IRL leadership 2)They've put him out, yet he's still an important stockholder 3) Therefore he wants to get even 4) That's why he considered seriously a proposal coming from Ganassi, who's having a strong redundancy on staff and machinery from his Nascar outfit 5) They have secretely contacted the team owners promising a new cheaper chassis: some of them welcomed the perspective, some didn't 6) Unfortunately their project ( a formerly 3 wheel triangle car, then transformed in a 4 wheel one, but still with a very narrow forward track) has been considered a cr@p by Honda, cos of its high unsafety 7) Nonetheless they are still concurring, given TG's role in the Hulman family 8) The only credible alternative seems to be dallara who have probably already submitted a different project. IRL have taken time to take a decision, and they have quite much, since the new car is scheduled to start in 2012 |
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
23 Nov 2009, 17:45 (Ref:2587947) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
Another split in the sport? I think tony george has blown his wad though and all the money is gone, plus he doesn't have control of the speedway anymore. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
23 Nov 2009, 18:20 (Ref:2587959) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
I read this from a twitter of a guy who painted the floor at the secret tunnel:
http://www.speedtv.com/forums/viewthread/477366/ |
||
|
24 Nov 2009, 08:01 (Ref:2588255) | #19 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
|||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
24 Nov 2009, 16:51 (Ref:2588510) | #20 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
25 Nov 2009, 10:37 (Ref:2588949) | #21 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Quote:
the fact that one thing is good doesn't necessarly mean it will happen |
|||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
25 Nov 2009, 02:23 (Ref:2588768) | #22 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,751
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
25 Nov 2009, 04:00 (Ref:2588791) | #23 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
I was reading today in the latest issue of Motorsport a column from N. Roebuck about how F1 has stagnated with all the long time regulars and how all the absolute power AND money has been corrupting. I see the same with the speedway and the irl, time for change. You have to give credit to the hulman clan for "saving" the speedway in 1945, but it's been the same groupthink for 65 years. Time for new ideas and new people and especially considering the deplorable condition of the irl, it needs to be on a radical scale. Nascar I think sensed that potential stagnation in the 1990's so they started opening up the upper management and markets and ideas. Granted I think they've turned it into too much of a circus, but then again it's probably time for an adjustment and change again. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
24 Nov 2009, 07:58 (Ref:2588252) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,512
|
Potential buyers? John Menard was one of them, but he probably didn't appreciate TG's secret manoeuvres, about whom John kept totally unaware
|
||
__________________
You got to learn how to fall, before you learn to fly P.Simon |
25 Nov 2009, 05:04 (Ref:2588821) | #25 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,751
|
I agree, change is good and I don't think anyone is calling for a revolution but what is interesting is how similar is/was TG's agenda to Bernie's - My way or the Highway, If you don't like it lump it, and in Bernie's case threatening the British GP.
|
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting Controversy in Today's Indy Star | Tim Northcutt | Indycar Series | 21 | 24 Apr 2010 01:17 |
Interesting 2006 Venue News in Indy Star | Tim Northcutt | IRL Indycar Series | 18 | 6 Apr 2005 01:24 |
From Indy Star - Another Bias?? | racinthestreets | ChampCar World Series | 11 | 17 Feb 2004 21:25 |
Interesting item about Franchittii | MolsonBoy | ChampCar World Series | 7 | 17 Aug 2002 10:16 |