|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
21 Sep 2009, 18:11 (Ref:2545278) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Time to scrap the safety car?
The entire Singapore incident could have been avoided if it weren't for the overuse of the safety car. Piquet knew that a crash at that point would bring it up, so as to compress the field and allow Alonso to make use of his earlier stop. In the past the drivers would have simply avoided driving too fast through the corner Piquet crashed at, or a gap in the wall would have been built in.
I'm increasingly starting to think the safety car causes more problems than it solves. Drivers used to be able to avoid debris and track workers under normal conditions, and the occasional red-flag never really did anybody any harm. The safety car artificially closes the field up, removes the chance to get crashed cars back into the race, and reduces the number of racing laps (making it harder for new drivers to learn the ropes). It exists not for 'safety' but for TV schedulers. Plenty of incidents have been caused by the safety car as well.
Maybe it's purely luck that nobody has been injured in any of these incidents. |
||
|
21 Sep 2009, 18:31 (Ref:2545304) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Symonds said to crash at that particular corner because there wasn't a crane there, meaning they had to put the safety car out. It just would've been too dangerous
I look back at some old races, often places like Monaco, where there were wrecked cars on the side of the circuit that would have led to safety car periods. I think perhaps they are a bit heavy-handed at times - there do seem to be double standards, like only putting the safety car out for the first lap crash at Monza in 2000 when a marshal was fatally injured but putting a red flag out for other first lap incidents. But I wouldn't get rid of the safety car altogether - the reason is in the phrase itself And 3 of those incidents were in junior series with inexperienced drivers. F1's completely different. I only ever remember a small handful of incidents under SC conditions in F1 (the Webber/Vettel collision caused by Hamilton's weaving, Button spinning himself off at Monza in 2000, Schumacher getting turned into the wall whilst brake-testing Montoya), and it's been in place for 16 years |
||
|
21 Sep 2009, 18:41 (Ref:2545312) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,664
|
Red flags are always going to be avoided because of the effect that they have on TV time and would you really want to sit around for 30 minutes whilst the track is cleared and the countdown starts again?
I don't see that the Piquet incident leads to a conclusion that the safety car should be scrapped. Just because some individuals choose to cheat doesn't mean that the whole concept of a safety car is flawed. National motorsport would be untenable without a safety car, we would run timetables with half the content on them (at twice the price) if we had to red flag sessions to retrieve cars in dangerous positions etc. ...and of course, if you want to come and marshal at events where the only options are a red flag or marshals retrieving vehicles etc. on a live circuit then you're welcome to! |
|
|
21 Sep 2009, 18:46 (Ref:2545319) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,276
|
who or why did some one came up with the phrase "saftey car" anywho , it just aint. its a pace car or a start car or a control car , it realy bugs me this over use of the word safety ..
does it stop accidents , or even stop at them ? it is just a jolly for berndt mylander (sp?) to mooch about on a gp weekend and get paid . get rid of the stupid thing and let them race like they used to and then they may get rid of it in clubbie racing too !!!! |
||
__________________
WOODY |
21 Sep 2009, 19:48 (Ref:2545369) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,809
|
The point of the safety car is to neutralise the race while incidents are dealt with in a safe manner by the hard working track officials and corner marshalls.
Anyone wanting to make motorsport uneccessarily MORE dangerous by removing the safety car, is a nutjob. |
||
__________________
From redshoes: ''I have no idea who the second Team Hard driver is, and I suspect after the name is announced I'll be none the wiser.'' |
21 Sep 2009, 19:51 (Ref:2545372) | #6 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 569
|
I think the safety car should be kept but not put on to the track unless it is realy needed. Monaco didn't need one this year so it should be doable at every track.
|
|
|
21 Sep 2009, 19:55 (Ref:2545379) | #7 | ||||||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The SC has the advantages in many areas. It keeps the cars moving, saving time (crucial for club motorsport). It bunches up the cars which is necessary for marshals to clear the track. It also has the commercial advantages too. What is the alternative? This does not detract from the fact that there are many cases where the SC is a necessity - it's either that or keeping part of the track under yellows for the rest of the race. Live snatches are possible in F1 but not possible everywhere. If you've got a car that's stopped on the track with a blown engine a red flag would cause havoc but local yellows would be silly. That's why the SC is needed - someone will suggest Code 60s but they don't bunch the cars up. |
||||||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Sep 2009, 20:52 (Ref:2545449) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
How did we cope without them in the past? I'd be willing to guess that we have 3-4 times as many safety car periods as we had red flags in those days. There are times when it's an advantage over red flags, especially for TV purposes, but did we really have half as many races at twice the cost (taking inflation into account) before it was added to national racing? At least the modern tracks with wide run-off areas don't need them as often.
|
||
|
21 Sep 2009, 20:57 (Ref:2545459) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,742
|
Clay Regazzoni ended up paralysed from hitting Ricardo Zunino's parked Brabham. And that was up an escape road as well. And then there's the unfortunate incident at Vancouver in the CART race when Jean Patrick Hein was mowed down by Willy T Ribbs
|
||
|
22 Sep 2009, 06:00 (Ref:2545691) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,664
|
Quote:
I'd hazard a guess that we didn't have the "health and safety" culture that we have now so if there were incidents it was more acceptable to leave cars on the edge of the track than it is now. Whereas now there are too many people who have forgotten that motorsport is dangerous. I'm also fairly sure that timetables didn't have the content in them that they do today, they were more relaxed. |
||
|
22 Sep 2009, 15:22 (Ref:2546041) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,364
|
Quote:
Two factors apart from H&S are gravel traps, meaning marshals can't remove many more cars, and fewer marshals. Regards Jim |
|||
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks. |
21 Sep 2009, 23:40 (Ref:2545575) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
I think the SC is a valid and necessary device in itself, but I do think it gets used at times when other options are more appropriate.
The USA and Canada have taken SC overuse to the extreme, and it would seem the rest of motorsport is very much heading that way. |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
22 Sep 2009, 06:05 (Ref:2545692) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Didn't Vancouver race officials have the option of the safety car? And perhaps Regazzoni's injuries would not have occurred in a modern F1 car, or indeed at a modern F1 circuit. The option of keeping part of the track under yellow isn't necessarily an awful one - especially if the corner is not an overtaking place.
|
||
|
22 Sep 2009, 07:02 (Ref:2545704) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,136
|
Sorry, but in what way was the Safety Car to blame in the Singapore Incident? They were just doing their job after all. TBH there is not much you can do to change it, unless you want to go back to the days of "red flag" everytime a serious crash happens?
|
||
__________________
A touring car and sportscar forum poster. The F1 sub forum is terrible! :P |
22 Sep 2009, 07:14 (Ref:2545709) | #15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,707
|
Quote:
So, are we going to get rid of barriers or street circuits as well? |
|||
__________________
Incognito: An Italian phrase meaning Nice Gearchange! |
22 Sep 2009, 07:40 (Ref:2545727) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,664
|
It doesn't even take a serious crash to bring out a safety car. It only needs a car stranded in a dangerous position - say beached on a kerb to need to neutralise the race in some way. I don't believe that yellows alone are effective, as someone else said, it doesn't bunch the field up to give a gap for the marshals to get out and try to clear the car.
|
|
|
29 Jun 2010, 07:22 (Ref:2719671) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,132
|
F1 will end up like Indy Car if it's not careful where the safety car appears to be used an option for spicing up races.
|
||
__________________
"Racing is Life. Anything before or after is just waiting" |
29 Jun 2010, 11:59 (Ref:2719805) | #18 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,753
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
22 Sep 2009, 07:53 (Ref:2545734) | #19 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,493
|
I've no problem with having a safety car, it's a necesary evil. I'm just glad they got rid of that ludicrous rule which prevented drivers from entering the pits, causing fuel-starved competitors to either pick up a penalty or break down.
The one thing I do dislike is the lottery element. Last season in particular, we had a number of freak results caused wholly by drivers lucking-out under the SC. I remember Piquet came 2nd in Germany and received all sorts of praise he didn't really deserve. |
|
|
22 Sep 2009, 10:44 (Ref:2545845) | #20 | ||
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,212
|
Not only can the safety car deployment be manipulated by the teams,it can also be manipulated by the officals to bunch the feild up to get better racing.
If only Piquet had spun out and not clouted the barrier no one would have been any the wiser. The marshalls at the Italian GP must be the fastest in the world at removing stranded cars,they were whipping them off the track so fast that a number of safety car deployments were averted. |
||
|
22 Sep 2009, 14:16 (Ref:2545999) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
We have common ECUs. Instead of the show car someone just flicks a switch at central control and they're all doing 50mph. Even if that's considered unsafe as it takes control out of the drivers' hands, it's not difficult to suggest that drivers should be forced to put the limiter on within 5 seconds of a pre-arranged signal and cannot gain position in those seconds. At least that does something to preserve the original gaps rather than allowing teams to do this sort of thing.
The miracle is it's taken so long for someone to come up with a way of circumventing it. Anyway, I dispute that a red flag puts people off. It adds to the intrigue and heightens the excitement and anticipation. The show car is the enemy of motorsport. And tell Viviane Senna it's safer... |
||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
22 Sep 2009, 14:24 (Ref:2546005) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Ensign, that is a similar principle to the Code 60 thing in the Netherlands. There are two clear faults in the Code 60, one specific to elite level single seaters.
The first is the fact that cars will not be bunched up. This makes it more difficult for vehicles to be snatched off the circuit, as the marshals would have very short windows to work in to clear the cars up if they were still circulating at 80 km/h. The second is that 80 km/h would be slower than the speed of the safety car in most circumstances now. It would cause even more tyre heat and pressure problems than the SC. |
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
22 Sep 2009, 14:59 (Ref:2546024) | #23 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
Quote:
To be fair, the drivers ought to be able to cope with that...but there would be ways around it, e.g. a lap at 150km/h to finish off. |
|||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
22 Sep 2009, 15:09 (Ref:2546032) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 6,359
|
As has been said in previous posts, the safety car bunches the cars up; that can create a gap of a couple of minutes in which to work, allowing much safer working than would be the case if cars were circulating, however slowly, spread out. In addition, the safety car observer will be in contact with Race Control, who will, in turn, be in contact with the people handling the incident, so the speed of the "train" can be controlled to take into account track conditions at the incident, even coming to a complete stop if necessary.
|
||
__________________
Doing an important job doesn't make you an important person. |
22 Sep 2009, 14:34 (Ref:2546008) | #25 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
Don't forget the rules that pitting under the safety car were different this time last year and they are primarily what enabled Alonso to gain such an advantage. The same incident again would not give Alonso such a big advantage.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
safety car | skaife2 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 6 | 28 Oct 2008 09:22 |
Safety Car procedure. Time for a change? Discuss... | Stuart Hill | Marshals Forum | 28 | 6 Jun 2008 11:11 |
Pictures of the Safety car/doctor car? | McKay | Trackside | 33 | 18 Jun 2003 05:56 |
MG to scrap Touring Car Project | rlinter | Touring Car Racing | 8 | 6 Dec 2001 11:31 |
Time to scrap the current formula | Franklin | ChampCar World Series | 31 | 2 May 2000 17:17 |